Mafiascum.net

In post 1047, Shadowlesscloud wrote:Havent fully caught up but as someone who knows how you play, yesterday was horrid for you. Your a good lynch for tomorrow.

why not today?

no pint he flubbed his claim and im gonna get very stroppy if people dont rope/vig this pronto

Problem is, I find it suspicious that he replied with a result not matching what a town seer gets. In the same vein, he checked dave over me despite stating I was scummier on his reads list. Starting to wonder that tt & temp are opposite alignments.

The NRG goes very strictly with the wiki in terms of results.
So it makes me question, does micc differ from the setup wiki of greater/greatest idea, when providing prs results?....because what temp stated, obviously differs from the wiki.

Is mass claiming our roles a good idea on d2 in this sort of game?.....I mostly lean toward "no".....unless there is some compelling argument.

*ugh my typos on some earlier posts...

In post 1049, Xtoxm wrote:why did you discard the PI? theres only one in the deck, using that for alignment would have made you a lot more likely town on pure mechanics

wasn't thinking about claiming alignment cards
when I chose which of my three town cards to discard
but yeah that would have been smart

I really wish I was vig so I could kill Performer rn

In post 1051, Xtoxm wrote:no pint he flubbed his claim and im gonna get very stroppy if people dont rope/vig this pronto

Sorry, what's flubbed and stroppy? It's so nice reading spanish words from time to time

And could you explain why are you so convinced about him "flubbing" his claim whatever that is? (I assume from the context is that he fucked up)

@performer
nobody said mass claim roles
we want a mass claim of the card you used for your alignment

In post 1050, TTTT wrote:

In post 1047, Shadowlesscloud wrote:Havent fully caught up but as someone who knows how you play, yesterday was horrid for you. Your a good lynch for tomorrow.

why not today?

Because there are better lynch targets to someone that flaked hard d1 and hasnt contributed d2 yet.

In post 1054, TTTT wrote:I really wish I was vig so I could kill Performer rn

VOTE: TTTT

I fullclaimed... for you to do a 720?!

720 means I'm back where I started

In post 1051, Xtoxm wrote:no pint he flubbed his claim and im gonna get very stroppy if people dont rope/vig this pronto

By the way I'm not opposing to TL's lynch; I think I was one of the first ones that proposed that yesterday, or maybe I wasn't but I agreed, I can't recall. I'm just saying it seems reachy to push him because of a claim that doesn't seem that bad

defending him after he fucked his claim isnt a good look for you pint

VOTE: TemporalLich

Was called out on someting incorrect he did and he ignored it.

Had a horrible d1 as well.

Id be happy here or Performer though i have reasons to think TL might be worse.

I'm not defending him...

In post 1059, TTTT wrote:720 means I'm back where I started

Also @TTTT gj with the vig claim forcing her to fully claim which let me and Irre CC her.

That being said, if she WASNT mafia, it might not have been a town thing. Imo, your confirmed not mafia. I could see you as one of the other alignments (Unlikely but possibly) or town wanting to apply pressure (Probably this.)

so in short, it was generally a +town move

In post 1061, Xtoxm wrote:defending him after he fucked his claim isnt a good look for you pint

In post 1060, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 1051, Xtoxm wrote:no pint he flubbed his claim and im gonna get very stroppy if people dont rope/vig this pronto

By the way I'm not opposing to TL's lynch; I think I was one of the first ones that proposed that yesterday, or maybe I wasn't but I agreed, I can't recall. I'm just saying it seems reachy to push him because of a claim that doesn't seem that bad

Could you be more helpful and instead of saying I'm defending him, explain to me what you meant with the post I asked about? Help a guy who doesn't speak english as his first language dude.

In post 1059, TTTT wrote:720 means I'm back where I started

"hardclaim dayvig" 331

"Dayvig: Elsa" (without Elsa dying) 856

"Lich -- full claim in your next post or I'll dayvig you" 1023

"I really wish I was vig so I could kill Performer rn" 1054

Yeah it's a 540, not a 720.

@performer, what are your thoughts on Dave?

I wanna know where your head is

EBWOP: 337

TemporalLich wrote:

In post 1059, TTTT wrote:720 means I'm back where I started

"hardclaim dayvig" 331

"Dayvig: Elsa" (without Elsa dying) 856

"Lich -- full claim in your next post or I'll dayvig you" 1023

"I really wish I was vig so I could kill Performer rn" 1054

Yeah it's a 540, not a 720.

what's the current record?
whatever it is I'm going for it!
yep I'm a dayvig
(720 achieved!)

In post 1061, Xtoxm wrote:defending him after he fucked his claim isnt a good look for you pint

okay I feel like you guys are to get me modkilled now.

I think Tony Hawk was the first skateboarder to get the 900 on a skateboard
I'm going for it with fake dayvig claims

shit!
I mean real dayvig claims!
900 achieved!!!