In post 1048, Dannflor wrote:I don't really know if claiming today was mechanically optimal but I figure it's not the worst case at least to get some information out there considering flipless
Well we know now that DEB was lockscum, since his claim was complete bs.
~HQ
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:36 am
by Chemist1422
UNVOTE: AA
noted
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:37 am
by Flavor Leaf
Nah, DEB 100% doesn’t fake that claim.
He could be that as scum, sure, but it wasn’t fake.
Also I had a thought that Ghost!DEB might have stopped the kill somehow
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:53 am
by Flavor Leaf
AA was bringing up the fact that they’re the most likely to die right?
That’s setting up this gambit, Dan could be a part of it.
However, by no killing there it makes it seem like the doctor still can protect.
VOTE: AA
This isn’t town
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:54 am
by Flavor Leaf
I can soul read DEB; I’m not wrong.
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:57 am
by Arkham Asylum
You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?
-Kat
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 9:06 am
by Arkham Asylum
In post 1060, Flavor Leaf wrote:AA was bringing up the fact that they’re the most likely to die right?
That’s setting up this gambit, Dan could be a part of it.
However, by no killing there it makes it seem like the doctor still can protect.
VOTE: AA
This isn’t town
LOL
WHAT?
~ Poison Ivy
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 9:07 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 1062, Arkham Asylum wrote:You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?
-Kat
To be fair, before I was saying 4 times simultaneously, I was saying 3, but alas, 4 was all.
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 9:31 am
by Arkham Asylum
The problem is I just modded you trying to argue that the traitor in animu was recruited night 3 or whatever instead of night 1 so you making completely nonsensical inferences about night actions does kinda read as scummy to me now, but I've kinda liked you for town since RVS so I don't like this feeling about you right now. There's no reason to think that we would gambit with a no kill night 1 when even if a doc is real that might not be the town's protective structure; instead it's just as likely to think there would be a roleblocker or a jailkeeper. The "doc enabler" doesn't do much since the game is flipless, and in any case if you think scum no kill to bait a doc save claim n1 from a rando... just no, dude. Either you think we're scum with Dann or you evaluate your read of us without that in mind. But the amount of bad logical leaps required for you to go down that little rabbit hole just really damaged my read of you lol
In post 1062, Arkham Asylum wrote:You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?
-Kat
To be fair, before I was saying 4 times simultaneously, I was saying 3, but alas, 4 was all.
I believe this. I had a period where I was scum in multiple games simultaneously, it was rough. He's talking like a guy who's been freed from his scum prison.
Y
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 9:35 am
by Arkham Asylum
Now that Dann claimed for basically no reason given we weren't under pressure and he wasn't under pressure is kinda ??? but given the game is flipless I guess I can see a world he would want to claim a soft inno even if it means he probably dies tonight
-Kat
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:13 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 1065, Arkham Asylum wrote:The problem is I just modded you trying to argue that the traitor in animu was recruited night 3 or whatever instead of night 1 so you making completely nonsensical inferences about night actions does kinda read as scummy to me now, but I've kinda liked you for town since RVS so I don't like this feeling about you right now. There's no reason to think that we would gambit with a no kill night 1 when even if a doc is real that might not be the town's protective structure; instead it's just as likely to think there would be a roleblocker or a jailkeeper. The "doc enabler" doesn't do much since the game is flipless, and in any case if you think scum no kill to bait a doc save claim n1 from a rando... just no, dude. Either you think we're scum with Dann or you evaluate your read of us without that in mind. But the amount of bad logical leaps required for you to go down that little rabbit hole just really damaged my read of you lol
-Kat
Aight. Let’s mass claim then.
I’ll start. No surprises in this flipless game then.
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:13 am
by Flavor Leaf
I’m V. T.
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:38 am
by jjh927
lol fuck this
VOTE: Flavor Leaf
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:43 am
by jjh927
-Believes a doctor enabler claim that got lynched
-Thinks we should massclaim day 2
I'd maybe give you either of those things in isolation, but not together, because their combination means you think we should out all the PRs when there's no protection for PRs
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:52 am
by Flavor Leaf
I mean, sure, but why do I do that so bluntly?
I do believe that doctor enabler claim.
DEB does not make that up. End of story, no arguments about it. He could have had scum coach him, or he could be legit scum doc enabler, but saying he comes up with it on his own isn’t a thing
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:53 am
by Flavor Leaf
Sorry, I’m just town here. This is a flipless game.