Mafiascum.net

Youre here. Youve made 25+ posts. Make the skitter one.

My lynch order is mena>teacher>sushi>skitter tbh

@mena i appreciate the effort. Not even joking here, i appreciate it. However, would have we won an award or something if we got a perfect game?

If my math is correct, mechsolving only gives 55% winrate though. But this is hardly a mechsolving matter.

now you're so desperate for it bc you want to change my focus away from you

I also think you prob want me dead bc you realised I was the most likely person to question the fact of creeper fakeclaim implying town!you so shutting down night actually benefits you bc I don't get to raise the points today

In post 1049, teacher wrote:I wont even fight that mislynch if you are town. A convincing skitter narrative is about the only thing that will get me to fight against your lynch tomorrow, but it needs to be today. Why the fuck do you think I keep asking you.

bc you're trying to divert my attention away from you and have a convincing skitt narrative to push late game from a conf!town player

also my skitt narrative is clear from reading my ISO

In post 1051, Farkran wrote:My lynch order is mena>teacher>sushi>skitter tbh

@mena i appreciate the effort. Not even joking here, i appreciate it. However, would have we won an award or something if we got a perfect game?

If my math is correct, mechsolving only gives 55% winrate though. But this is hardly a mechsolving matter.

you won't get a perfect game even if there is no NK because you're gonna mislynch me tomorrow

like I fully accept that I'm the mislynch tomorrow

but I also think town is playing terribly bc there's just no way that I pour in this much effort as scum when I've lost

I'm just trying to make sure that town don't fuck up what should be a winning game

In post 890, teacher wrote:I dont think Menalque is the solve tho. I think he would have discussed safeclaims - his last scum game involved a counterclaim-off. I also think he coaches in the scum-PT more -> to be active and how to respond. I mean it is certainly possible and would be fine lynching him, but want to raise that.

I need to reevaluate the other newbs.

@Menalque, in case it wasnt clear, its time to talk about your skitter evolution.

In post 875, teacher wrote:

In post 836, teacher wrote:768 on Creeper: NMSA, Seleynee, Menalque, Skitter (Menalque leaves in 790

This almost certainly contains a scum.

@Menalque, I really need that skitter evolution verbalization.

In post 853, teacher wrote:Didn’t see this page. Fair enough on the wagons. I did overlook emps intent.

I do think skit/Menalque has a scum. I do want Menalque to come back in today and give words.

In post 865, teacher wrote:And how does believing it affect your read on Fark?m

Don’t forget the skit thing either.

You had plenty of time to provide the skitter thing all day. I kept asking for it.
You reacted to creepers claim, but didnt provide the skit case.
Provide it.

no

it's obvious to see from reading my posts

teacher is scum

lynch him after me

In post 1054, Menalque wrote:also my skitt narrative is clear from reading my ISO

ITs not. ITs why I asked for it yesterday and you said it was "fair". So why should it be obvious now?

In post 823, teacher wrote:I’m gonna be online in like 30 and tipsy. Slots happened but leave me any questions you want as well.

Men’s, is like you to put the skit evolution into words,

because although I see it I want verbalizatiob.

Emps, same on mena- you earlier said way off scum meta so what changed?

doesn't sound like it was unclear

I came up with a possible narrative. I want you to say what yours was, because that is literally the only way I can trust you. I have no idea what yours was, I just know what one could be.

In post 1059, teacher wrote:

In post 1054, Menalque wrote:also my skitt narrative is clear from reading my ISO

ITs not. ITs why I asked for it yesterday and you said it was "fair". So why should it be obvious now?

In post 1060, Menalque wrote:

In post 823, teacher wrote:I’m gonna be online in like 30 and tipsy. Slots happened but leave me any questions you want as well.

Men’s, is like you to put the skit evolution into words,

because although I see it I want verbalizatiob.

Emps, same on mena- you earlier said way off scum meta so what changed?

doesn't sound like it was unclear

this alone should be enough proof that teacher is the second scum once I flip town

but then again town is playing p terribly bc I am obvtowning so hard right now and none of you are seeing it apparently

skitt is still kinda scummy if teacher does flip town tho

bc skitt is someone I would definitely expect to TR me this game and she doesn't/didn't so prob lynch skitt before sushi actually

and that happened in Pokemon fusion with FL and I correctly got him as scum there

In post 1062, Menalque wrote:

In post 1059, teacher wrote:

In post 1054, Menalque wrote:also my skitt narrative is clear from reading my ISO

ITs not. ITs why I asked for it yesterday and you said it was "fair". So why should it be obvious now?

In post 1060, Menalque wrote:

In post 823, teacher wrote:I’m gonna be online in like 30 and tipsy. Slots happened but leave me any questions you want as well.

Men’s, is like you to put the skit evolution into words,

because although I see it I want verbalizatiob.

Emps, same on mena- you earlier said way off scum meta so what changed?

doesn't sound like it was unclear

this alone should be enough proof that teacher is the second scum once I flip town

but then again town is playing p terribly bc I am obvtowning so hard right now and none of you are seeing it apparently

I came up with a possible narrative. I want you to say what yours was, because that is literally the only way I can trust you. I have no idea what yours was, I just know what one could be.

nah, I'm going to bed, lynch order should be teacher-->skitt-->sushi

but bc you're (town collectively) bad you're gonna mislynch me first, so my revised order is me-->teacher-->skitt-->sushi

although do be v susp of emps if he's in lylo, but then again prob just be susp of everyone

In post 1064, Menalque wrote:bc skitt is someone I would definitely expect to TR me this game and

Dude, you played scummy.

You townread Fark (knowntown) on posts that everyone else found scummy.
You flipped out NMSA (knowntown) for incredibly reachy reasons.

Only when you started to be a wagon did you town it up.

You saw Fark as potential PR and hinted that. Which should have made you flip back onto Fark after the Creeper claim, given that you claimed to believe Creeper, but instead you simply promised the skitter followup without a hint of switching back to Fark. (Also, you gave the initial push to believe creeper - coing online to do that, but not to post what you had said you would.

Like objectively, there isnt a good reason to townread you this game. Im looking for one. Thats why Im being a stick in the mud.

In post 1067, teacher wrote:

In post 1064, Menalque wrote:bc skitt is someone I would definitely expect to TR me this game and

Dude, you played scummy.

You townread Fark (knowntown) on posts that everyone else found scummy.
You flipped out NMSA (knowntown) for incredibly reachy reasons.

Only when you started to be a wagon did you town it up.

You saw Fark as potential PR and hinted that. Which should have made you flip back onto Fark after the Creeper claim, given that you claimed to believe Creeper, but instead you simply promised the skitter followup without a hint of switching back to Fark. (Also, you gave the initial push to believe creeper - coing online to do that, but not to post what you had said you would.

Like objectively, there isnt a good reason to townread you this game. Im looking for one. Thats why Im being a stick in the mud.

Just incidentally, this is all why I should be being TR and it also implies scum!teacher

He’s familiar with me as scum, and he knows I wouldn’t be this careless as scum

I never saw fark as possible PR or hinted at it

I made it v clear why I wasn’t posting about skitt (I was out) and he knows I don’t do long posts from my phone. That’s established meta for me

Also he (should?) know that I increasingly only start to town it up when I get wagoned

Look at pfup for an example, or purge mafia

I think I was prob on balance scummy in both of those games until I got wagoned at which point I obvtowned like hell

Like I’m doing now

Because I’m town

My scumgame is not good enough to play like this as scum

Guaranteed after I flip town creature either tired to discredit me/justify his progression on my slot (referring back to posts like the above) or he acts super chill about his own wagon or both

Either way, just make sure he does after me

In post 1068, Menalque wrote:I never saw fark as possible PR or hinted at it

In post 884, teacher wrote:

In post 691, Menalque wrote:I've been more reticent on fark than I think I might have been and I think you know why

This is also why I was coming around on Menalque for playing the same possibility.

Fuck, teacher* not creature

That was not a PR hint in any way shape or form

In post 1068, Menalque wrote:I increasingly only start to town it up when I get wagoned

Ive played with you twice. Once as scum (so of course you wouldnt play the same way, esp. since emps was there too), and once where you hardtowned all game, not just as a wagon target -- Newb 1934 - to the point where you were NK1

That was my first game, I’ve evolved a lot as a player since then