Mafiascum.net

In post 1045, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1042, Dannflor wrote:Nancy, not everyone holds meta to the same regard

Except it's a meta-based argument in the first place.

RCE is arguing:
a) that my argument with RC was faked (0.o)
b) for the sake of saving Bitmap (was the wagon on Bitmap growing at that point?)
c) based on his sense that I am like to "scum brag" as scum (???)

C is an explicitly a meta-based argument which raises the question of what games he imagines I "scum bragged" in. He's played with me twice as scum iirc and imo neither of those games included me "scum bragging" -- although all three individual components of his argument seem sketch.

Also.

In post 508, Sailor Senshi wrote:Gamma spat might make Gamma town and I have no problem with the push on Bitmap

None of these things are actually interesting, they're things that happened in the thread but that doesn't make them actually worth comment unless I feel like Bitmap or pops is actually worth a push.

I actually specifically said that one of the reason I wasn't engaging more in the thread was because I basically had no problem with the Bitmap wagon which is why I was skeptical of the need to push our slot for content in the first place. If the game was already advancing on a good wagon, why is it *my slot* that produced an argument to 'save' Bitmap?

-Mercury

In post 1048, Titus wrote:Hmph...

The proxy thing works by Katsuki voting who I say. I already answered why the different wagon...VCA.

Shiro should bake a cookie matching your hydra's mood.

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:B.) Pfup was a meta outlier for all of your scum games. I think a lot higher of your scum potential than was shown there.

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:B.) Pfup was a meta outlier for all of your scum games. I think a lot higher of your scum potential than was shown there.

In post 1045, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1042, Dannflor wrote:Nancy, not everyone holds meta to the same regard

Except it's a meta-based argument in the first place.

RCE is arguing:
a) that my argument with RC was faked (0.o)
b) for the sake of saving Bitmap (was the wagon on Bitmap growing at that point?)
c) based on his sense that I am like to "scum brag" as scum (???)

C is an explicitly a meta-based argument which raises the question of what games he imagines I "scum bragged" in. He's played with me twice as scum iirc and imo neither of those games included me "scum bragging" -- although all three individual components of his argument seem sketch.

Also.

In post 508, Sailor Senshi wrote:Gamma spat might make Gamma town and I have no problem with the push on Bitmap

None of these things are actually interesting, they're things that happened in the thread but that doesn't make them actually worth comment unless I feel like Bitmap or pops is actually worth a push.

I actually specifically said that one of the reason I wasn't engaging more in the thread was because I basically had no problem with the Bitmap wagon which is why I was skeptical of the need to push our slot for content in the first place. If the game was already advancing on a good wagon, why is it *my slot* that produced an argument to 'save' Bitmap?

-Mercury

In post 1051, Sailor Senshi wrote:

Mech announcement. -- We were targeted by a day ability

(a day roleblock as far as I can tell).

The flavor basically read: Our day abilities were sealed.

To be clear, we were informed that our abilities were sealed, this does not mean that we have a day ability or that we tried to use one necessarily. It seemed like we would be informed of the day roleblock regardless of whether we had a day ability or not. We were not informed of which player targeted us.

I kinda don't know why we were informed that our abilities were sealed, trying to remember the word for where you know you're targeted by the ability but not who targeted you. Or is that just a variation of loud? Or is this a common ruling from GiF that people are informed when they're targeted by a roleblock?

-Mercury

In post 1053, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:B.) Pfup was a meta outlier for all of your scum games. I think a lot higher of your scum potential than was shown there.

Why? Did you think I did well in Jazz or what games are you thinking of here? I mean I remember you feeling like I fooled you but I was also being destroyed by Skitter at the time so I don't feel like that was a particularly good game for me.

-Mercury

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:C.) I've been exploring a hypothetical why the distraction would occur and Dann narrowed it into "RCE thinks Sailor is bits partner." Which is not what I said.

In post 1054, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:B.) Pfup was a meta outlier for all of your scum games. I think a lot higher of your scum potential than was shown there.

oh wait or were you talking about Nancy here?

-Mercury

In post 1052, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1048, Titus wrote:Hmph...

The proxy thing works by Katsuki voting who I say. I already answered why the different wagon...VCA.

Shiro should bake a cookie matching your hydra's mood.

I will have to reread that. Did you explain in that post, why Katsuki?

I was expecting you to answer something like chocolate chip but okay.

In post 1055, RCEnigma wrote:Playing devil's advocate the case can be made that scum took advantage of you vs Ephraim as the catalyst. Which is what I was getting at when I alluded to the implication on LE's slot.

In post 244, Katsuki wrote:I'm gonna proxy my vote to Titus this game.

In post 1058, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:C.) I've been exploring a hypothetical why the distraction would occur and Dann narrowed it into "RCE thinks Sailor is bits partner." Which is not what I said.

How is this distraction orchestrated if that's not what you believe

Sailor as town purposefully tries to distract from the Bitmap wagon?

I'm not following

In post 1063, Bitmap wrote:Like your scum read on me is based on someone else's actions...

Why aren't you voting the person who did the scummy action?

In post 1055, RCEnigma wrote:A.) No I said it has the possibility to be intentional.

In post 1051, Sailor Senshi wrote:Or is that just a variation of loud?

In post 1066, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 1063, Bitmap wrote:Like your scum read on me is based on someone else's actions...

Why aren't you voting the person who did the scummy action?

Wouldn't be the first time I've caught scum via another slot.

In post 1062, Bitmap wrote:Actually RCEnigma, what did

I

do specifically to warrant a scum read and a vote?

In post 1063, Bitmap wrote:Like your scum read on me is based on someone else's actions...

Why aren't you voting the person who did the scummy action?

In post 1066, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 1063, Bitmap wrote:Like your scum read on me is based on someone else's actions...

Why aren't you voting the person who did the scummy action?

Wouldn't be the first time I've caught scum via another slot.

In post 1071, popsofctown wrote:The 1v1 is over and Nancy Drew and Shiro are pretty active now. Why are you still here, Krazy? Have you fallen back in love with mafia?

In post 1071, popsofctown wrote:The 1v1 is over and Nancy Drew and Shiro are pretty active now. Why are you still here, Krazy? Have you fallen back in love with mafia?