In post 1014, Lady 5 wrote:Gentleman 5 would help with pushing my scum Reads but I’d have trouble trusting him at least in the beginning as he’s not my Lock Town where I can say with 100% confidence that Gentleman 3 is Town.
Me and Him can share are Reads and make stronger solving.
This reads to me as something I would say in a scum PT. Like something I would ask my scumbuddies before accepting the proposal. Given her hesitance, It makes me wonder.
I think L8 is mafia, I dont think L5 can be mafia with L8 given their interactions imo, so I may have to check into my reads of both.
L5 are you just going to ignore this as well?
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:15 am
by Gentleman 3
In post 1022, Lady 7 wrote:Can we please stop with the altguesses? It would really suck if he started force replacing due to it.
+1
That seems pretty clearly against the idea of the game.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:15 am
by Gentleman 3
In post 1030, Gentleman 5 wrote:That pairing of G2-L9 lost its luster when L9 started posting.
That’s my order of preference for pairing based on who is left.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:28 am
by Gentleman 3
She's clearly a strong player; she's playing solidly, outing reads, asking questions, but there's nothing there that reads as specifically motivated by solving rather than motivated by keeping up the appearance of solving-- it could easily be either one.
Did you? I don't think it's normal for scum to post reads in the scum PT as though they really believe them.
I assume they are discussing who they should pair with or who is a good person to dance with.
People in the scum PT could be like
“dont partner with G5 since hes probably getting lynched early or plans on leaving right away”
or something similar.
I just see that as her reasoning on why or why not to accept, it rubs me the wrong way.
Gentleman 3 wrote:She's clearly a strong player; she's playing solidly, outing reads, asking questions, but there's nothing there that reads as specifically motivated by solving rather than motivated by keeping up the appearance of solving-- it could easily be either one.
Pushing the game forward in the early game like she has is a plus for me.
I really dont like her activity post-accept though. I know its only been a day and a half but still. Odd
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:33 am
by Gentleman 3
In post 1067, Gentleman 5 wrote:People in the scum PT could be like “dont partner with G5 since hes probably getting lynched early or plans on leaving right away” or something similar.
But that's not at all what she said.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:34 am
by Gentleman 3
In post 1067, Gentleman 5 wrote:Pushing the game forward in the early game like she has is a plus for me.
Ehh. I don't really think pushing the game forward is that towny in a game where deepwolfing is everything.
In post 1067, Gentleman 5 wrote:People in the scum PT could be like “dont partner with G5 since hes probably getting lynched early or plans on leaving right away” or something similar.
But that's not at all what she said.
Look at that post again.
Im saying it reads as something I would expect in a scum pt. It doesnt feel right. I dont know what more I can say.
Gentleman 3 wrote:
In post 1067, Gentleman 5 wrote:Pushing the game forward in the early game like she has is a plus for me.
Ehh. I don't really think pushing the game forward is that towny in a game where deepwolfing is everything.
Unless I know the person via meta or personal expierences, Im intending to townread her for it, but again, her disappearance has me worried.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:48 am
by Gentleman 4
Gentleman 3, do you think Lady 4 is town?
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:52 am
by Gentleman 4
I know there is no stated time deadline for posting in the thread, but I'm not completely certain if this is due to an oversight or players are legitimately allowed to lurk for the entirety of the game.