Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:07 am
Hello Penguin, I see you there, guess what I’ve got for you?
Spoiler:
dear jesus, is it meIn post 1035, Menalque wrote:Also there’s one player here who’s like, intensely scummy and hasn’t been pressured at all lmao
what i know about pine is i got him eliminated once long ago when i was scum and he was obvtown. also had a kinda trash scumgame but that was also forever ago so i assume no longer trueIn post 1037, Menalque wrote:Oh, and anyone who knows pine should know this is an obvtown slot
Pine now has a notoriously good scumgame and is actively more enthusiastic when rolling scum (although he can strategically lurk). It’s ++town for me that he let himself be replaced instead of hitting the minimum activity requirements, which is something he could definitely have done if he was scum and lurking intentionally instead of bc he just wasn’t engaged as townIn post 1053, petapan wrote:what i know about pine is i got him eliminated once long ago when i was scum and he was obvtown. also had a kinda trash scumgame but that was also forever ago so i assume no longer true
okay is it dunnstralIn post 1055, Menalque wrote:*shakes head gently*In post 1053, petapan wrote:dear jesus, is it me
No
o/In post 1031, the worst wrote:
It’s not him eitherIn post 1058, petapan wrote:okay is it dunnstralIn post 1055, Menalque wrote:*shakes head gently*In post 1053, petapan wrote:dear jesus, is it me
No
Because we still have plenty of time and it doesn't seem like discussion is remotely done.In post 1049, Menalque wrote:S_S why are you still not voting?
It’s not any less true thoIn post 1057, TheGoldenParadox wrote:it's so funny that you're talking about your own slot, one that you got the role pm for, as "++town for you"
"
Hey S_S!
And since then, the site meta has shifted to where that is no longer acceptable and this person would probably get quite a negative reception for doing this today.In post 1051, DrippingGoofball wrote:Once, a long long time ago, when you were still a glimmer in your father's eye, I had mercy on a player who brought up a detailed personal sob story. This player is still on the site. The story was completely false, and the player was scum. She argue that as scum, you use anything you can to your advantage.
I'm ambivalent between DGB and Hoopla.In post 1063, Menalque wrote:Who would you vote for?
Nope!Also, wanna take a stab at my super secret scumread?
How come?In post 1065, Something_Smart wrote:Nope!
You seem to have correctly intuited that this is, indeed, part of the reason why I think you’re likely to be scum!In post 1066, DrippingGoofball wrote:@Menalque
I have been at times busy (this game for example, I had a publishing deadline to respect) but once my timetable cleared up, I fulfilled my obligations.
Why hoopla?In post 1065, Something_Smart wrote:I'm ambivalent between DGB and Hoopla.
There was a negative reaction back then, too.In post 1064, Something_Smart wrote:And since then, the site meta has shifted to where that is no longer acceptable and this person would probably get quite a negative reception for doing this today.In post 1051, DrippingGoofball wrote:Once, a long long time ago, when you were still a glimmer in your father's eye, I had mercy on a player who brought up a detailed personal sob story. This player is still on the site. The story was completely false, and the player was scum. She argue that as scum, you use anything you can to your advantage.
Because she's got a wagon?In post 1070, Menalque wrote:Why hoopla?
But that’s not really what I’m asking, what I’m really asking is “who do you think could be a slot I think is so scummy as to term it “obvscum” but that hasn’t seen pressure yet?”In post 1071, Something_Smart wrote:I don't see why I should be able to predict the reads of someone who just entered the game with better than random accuracy (assuming as you have already stated that they are not just consensus).