Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:46 pm
Well i do think it’s bonkers, but ok.
Think what you may.
Think what you may.
also, this WIFOMy reaction is just lame and childish.In post 1027, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ugh, Taylor.In post 995, Nero Cain wrote:im town reading Norway but I will say that he'd make some sense as a Taylor buddy so when/if she flips scum im going to strongly consider a norway flip, But taylor accusing me of bussing muh just looks like buddy play. So maybe im at
taylor
muh
maybe norway
IV
I told you to distance.
so when scum gets flipped you never suspect the player that defends them?In post 1050, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well i do think it’s bonkers, but ok.
I think I get it?In post 1014, Nero Cain wrote:if you already read the first 15 pages why do you want a TL:DR?
That’s not really what i care about. The reason i’m having a "light push back" as you call it is because i am actively aware that scum is most likely attempting to pocket me, and your read on has seemed contradictory. I know i’m not scum so that’s not the issue for me here.In post 1052, Nero Cain wrote:so when scum gets flipped you never suspect the player that defends them?In post 1050, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well i do think it’s bonkers, but ok.
It's not a flawless impossible-to-fake towntell but it is a towntell. Evidence for a proposition is anything that is more likely if the proposition is true than if it's false. Regardless of how likely DGB would be to respond that way as scum, she'd beIn post 966, innocentvillager wrote:fine, assuming she gets towncred for that might have been a bit of a circular-esque assumptionIn post 944, Umlaut wrote:That's entirely possible, sure. Wouldn't that imply there is towncred to be gained in the first place by admitting to the slip-up?In post 942, innocentvillager wrote:You really think scum!dgb who made a perfectly understandable and legitimate mistake
Doesn’t take the perfect opportunity to explain themselves here with that mess up to get towncred
but regardless of how it might be viewed, it can't really be like, that bad
my main point, was in the rest of that quote that you cut off, which was how it seems unlikely scum!dgb wouldn't just admit to the genuine mistake they actually made
so I'm wondering with all this in mind, why you're still townreading that reaction/if you are
I guess it's not actually that important since as you pointed out it's very very old meta. But it's if anything a reminder to myself that just because you're scumreading me for what look to me like dumb reasons doesn't mean you're scum.In post 966, innocentvillager wrote:lmao, what a game, and it was also a cakez game. also was me and you from 4+ years ago so I'm not gonna read into too much. that was also teen aggro-ivIn post 953, Umlaut wrote:I can only remember one other game I played with IV and he was on my ass because he didn't like my reads in that game too.
To be fair, my reads really were bad in that game and the guy he criticized me for hard-defending was scum.
was there anything in particular you wanted to reference from that game? or just for nostalgia's sake? (<3)
After seeing Nero criticize this pool I looked at what ABR's actually saying more closely and it's practically vacuous. He's not saying "at least half of these players are scum," he's not saying "at least half the scum are in this group," he's saying thatIn post 666, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Glitch NPOM Umlot Kanna-slot and Golden
Pretty sure we have better than 50% odds of hitting scum in this group
I'll iso guillotine
pushing you as a possible taylor buddy is like the exact opposite of pocketing you.In post 1054, NorwegianboyEE wrote:i am actively aware that scum is most likely attempting to pocket me,
Yeah i’m sleepy. Meant to say: «has likely been attempting to pocket me so far"In post 1058, Nero Cain wrote:pushing you as a possible taylor buddy is like the exact opposite of pocketing you.In post 1054, NorwegianboyEE wrote:i am actively aware that scum is most likely attempting to pocket me,
Who are you scum reading that has a town read on you?
In post 1056, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My read on you is dropping.
In post 1059, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Not ready to answer question fully yet,
Shut up.In post 1062, Nero Cain wrote:I guess you need advice from your scumbuddies first?
lame.In post 1063, NorwegianboyEE wrote:May, Kanna comes to mind though. They both called me town and then just flaked.
Umlaut what do you think of VOTE: TheGoldenParadox ?In post 1057, Umlaut wrote:After seeing Nero criticize this pool I looked at what ABR's actually saying more closely and it's practically vacuous. He's not saying "at least half of these players are scum," he's not saying "at least half the scum are in this group," he's saying thatIn post 666, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Glitch NPOM Umlot Kanna-slot and Golden
Pretty sure we have better than 50% odds of hitting scum in this group
I'll iso guillotinethere's a better than 50% chance that at least one of them is scumwhich is literally a weaker statement than just saying he has no idea they are scum (if I drew five players at random, assuming a scumteam of 4 the probability one of them is scum is something like 79%).
I assume this isn't what he actually meant but it's a hell of a hedgy statement to make.
I don't know why you quoted my post, but I actually feel really good about VOTE: TheGoldenParadox. Really the worst vote for me in the bunch.In post 1067, Guillotina wrote:Umlaut what do you think of VOTE: TheGoldenParadox ?In post 1057, Umlaut wrote:After seeing Nero criticize this pool I looked at what ABR's actually saying more closely and it's practically vacuous. He's not saying "at least half of these players are scum," he's not saying "at least half the scum are in this group," he's saying thatIn post 666, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Glitch NPOM Umlot Kanna-slot and Golden
Pretty sure we have better than 50% odds of hitting scum in this group
I'll iso guillotinethere's a better than 50% chance that at least one of them is scumwhich is literally a weaker statement than just saying he has no idea they are scum (if I drew five players at random, assuming a scumteam of 4 the probability one of them is scum is something like 79%).
I assume this isn't what he actually meant but it's a hell of a hedgy statement to make.
putting this in my isoIn post 999, Guillotina wrote:Also, I can't read Taylor. She could be open wolfing or she could be a scummy town player, so when I form a solid town block I will have to trust their read on Taylor or I don't know, I can't read her.
Who is Jade? I don't think you are a sack of shit.In post 903, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have grown Jaded with this petty squabble. Yes I know I capitalized that word and it’s because there is a specific Jade that helped me realize I’m an overemotional sack of shit today.