Mafiascum.net

VoteCount 1.29

Battle Mage [4]

OutWorldER flea the magician DrippingGoofball blitzo

No Elim [3]

sircakez titus battle mage

Haschel Cedricson [2]

alisae akarin

titus[1]

bell

blitzo [1]

thegoldenparadox

murdercat [1]

PookyTheMagicalBear

Flea the magician [1]

Haschel Cedricson

Alisae [1]

xRECKONERx

Bell [1]

murdercat

xRECKONERx [1]

Gamma Emerald

Not Voting [1]

taly

With 17 alive it takes 9 votes to be executed.

Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2020-12-08 15:40:31)

In post 1046, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1016, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1015, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 585, SirCakez wrote:Personally I feel OER or Bell are the more likely scums there, not BM

why
tbh Titus' reads seem sensible

BM is playing to town meta

Meta is cancer

a woman after my own heart

In post 1049, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1028, SirCakez wrote:BM is lurk fuck as scum and actually plays as town

Oh so you're saying he's scum

mkay

I need a translator like you

Okay, so using the magic of random.org, I did a night where everyone goes to a random room:
Assume 4 Imposters, everyone goes to a random room (Imposters can do better than this)

• Cafeteria: Crew #4
• Weapons: Crew #11, Imposter #4
• Navigation: Crew #6, Crew #12, Imposter #1, Imposter #3
• Shields: Crew #1, Crew #13
• Communications: Crew #3, Crew #7
• Admin: Crew #8
• Electrical: Crew #5, Crew #9
• Security:
• Reactor: Crew #2
• Upper Engine: Crew #10, Imposter #2
Say Crew #10 dies as a bonus kill to Imposter #2, and they use their normal kill on Imposter #4.



Or if they really wanted to NK crew #9, for example, then Crew #5 has no one to vouch for them either, while

I just think y'all are vastly overestimating how good the POE is if we do this completely random and unannounced.

In post 1053, Akarin wrote:everyone goes to a random room (Imposters can do better than this)

Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

Cakez, is the BM vote just about lurking/meta? I thought some of it was their actual posts?

DGB is mindmelding with me quite a bit here.
Maybe she's town.
I'm also really not a huge fan of the meta reads here, especially knowing how badly they messed up the last game.
I'm aware that that in and of itself is a meta read but I think it really needs to be said.

I'm not voting BM?
If you mean others, I think they are unfamiliar with him. He has a...unique playstyle

Aren't you scumreading him though?

Or am I confused?

Cakez has been defending bm

In post 1055, MURDERCAT wrote:Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

If it's like 5 people trying to group it's not much different than random is the point.

And no, I'm not sure everyone agrees this is bad. A lot of people keep saying things that make me think they actually agree this is bad.

In post 1061, Akarin wrote:

In post 1055, MURDERCAT wrote:Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

If it's like 5 people trying to group it's not much different than random is the point.

And no, I'm not sure everyone agrees this is bad. A lot of people keep saying things that make me think they

don't

actually agree this is bad.

Random means we don't accomplish tasks.

I'm not doing random. Period.

SIGH

I wasn't at any point suggesting going to random rooms.

The assumption of random is that everyone just doing one of their tasks amounts to random rooms, assuming roughly equal distribution of tasks among the rooms.

In post 1063, Akarin wrote:SIGH

I wasn't at any point suggesting going to random rooms.

The assumption of random is that everyone just doing one of their tasks amounts to random rooms, assuming roughly equal distribution of tasks among the rooms.

Except it doesn't. For instance, Alisae has two tasks. One takes her to electrical the other to another room. By actively selecting electrical, we force a room of three (assuming BM lives).

That's a strong reason for BM to live. He has to try and complete his one task and can have another passed off to him from the dead corpse. It's a win-win situation regardless of BM's alignment.

Akarin doing gods work here

PRAIsE AKARIN

Are you just deliberately trying to muddy the water here Titus?

In post 709, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 654, Alisae wrote:Ya I want some Chaos
I trust you to create that environment

You're town, Pooky is town, that's what I got so far.

why only this >:/

In post 1066, Akarin wrote:Are you just deliberately trying to muddy the water here Titus?

No. I just literally don't understand why you're saying random rooms at all.

In post 1053, Akarin wrote:Say Crew #10 dies as a bonus kill to Imposter #2, and they use their normal kill on Imposter #4.

why would imposters kill their own player what

In post 724, Alisae wrote:Maybe I feel like this just comes from this expectation I have that Titus would play a bigger part than she currently has? I feel like this is just the root of my worries atm.
I also feel like she might have added a bit more to the mech talk but I'm not 100% on this.

Titus is on record as disliking d1, which as much as it initially struck me as confusing when she started saying that, it does make sense as why she'd not be very driven today. Titus just seems like a late-game powerhouse player

In post 1068, Titus wrote:

In post 1066, Akarin wrote:Are you just deliberately trying to muddy the water here Titus?

No. I just literally don't understand why you're saying random rooms at all.

I'm arguing in favor of at least partial claiming and saying that half the players haven't thought this through and have unrealistic expectations.

Random rooms = everyone refuses to claim and "just does our tasks"

In post 1061, Akarin wrote:

In post 1055, MURDERCAT wrote:Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

If it's like 5 people trying to group it's not much different than random is the point.

And no, I'm not sure everyone agrees this is bad. A lot of people keep saying things that make me think they

don't

actually agree this is bad.

Well if that's the case then I'm glad you did it. I'm assuming the non claim people are still generally on board with grouping but maybe that's not right.

In post 1069, xRECKONERx wrote:why would imposters kill their own player what

Crew #11 (the one paired with Imposter #4)

Sorry

In post 1071, Akarin wrote:

In post 1068, Titus wrote:

In post 1066, Akarin wrote:Are you just deliberately trying to muddy the water here Titus?

No. I just literally don't understand why you're saying random rooms at all.

I'm arguing in favor of at least partial claiming and saying that half the players haven't thought this through and have unrealistic expectations.

Random rooms = everyone refuses to claim and "just does our tasks"

Ahh ok. Sorry.