Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:43 am
In post 1048, LicketyQuickety wrote:And is Gamma just asking questions to look busy and inflate their postcount?
BRUH
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 1048, LicketyQuickety wrote:And is Gamma just asking questions to look busy and inflate their postcount?
he still has four votes on him does he not? three of those (including you) being people he is scumreading atmIn post 1047, Gamma Emerald wrote:Nero was a popular vote previously but seems to have fallen out of favorIn post 1043, Shrek wrote:I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts areIn post 1026, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable
how exactly does this prove that your reads arent just based on the consensus of what people have been saying
StD seems mostly untouched despite being low activity
so no I don't think those are "consensus scumreads"
Like you're 2 top town reads...In post 1054, Gamma Emerald wrote:there's also been like an equal amount of people who have hard objected to the Nero wagon
then you're an idiot or a liar, because that's completely falseIn post 1053, Nero Cain wrote:Angry gamma is scum gamma. See I just offered evidence
metaIn post 1055, Dwlee99 wrote:STD I'll accept your read on me as legitimate as long as you don't say the word "meta."
Nah not bussing.In post 1007, Nero Cain wrote:Gamma scum reading t3 whom was voting me gives me a bussing vibe
I only got angry in postgame because I felt like you insulted my skillIn post 1062, Nero Cain wrote:It's almost like you offered a statement but are calling that evidence
But what was that game I caught u d1 and u got all angry. Mbos10?
If I am then I'll throw it all back at him the first chance I getIn post 1064, Dwlee99 wrote:Gamma I think you're being trolled
to go back to this, this doesn't equate with what Nero postedIn post 1044, Gamma Emerald wrote:Except I absolutely DID offer evidenceIn post 1041, Nero Cain wrote:But gamma you were agreeing with t3s meta "point" yes you worded it differently but by and large you were agreeing that this wasn't my town game. Not that you offered any evidence or anythingWanna keep hurling shit that won't stick?In post 375, Gamma Emerald wrote:It doesn’t carry much of the energy I remember from LN 230 or 231In post 369, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is scummy?In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like I’m more familiar with your relationship with Nero and I also think Nero is scummy
So I’m a bit concerned you’re trying attack Cheeky’s ability to read you two
Both of those games Nero felt very passionate, albeit in different aspects. Here he feels a bit deflated.
and also just because I agreed in the moment doesn't mean he wasn't coming from an informed POV