Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2021 9:19 am
Yeet.
Rock, paper, scissors, right now, Luke. Loser votes the other.In post 1051, Lukewarm wrote:That's the point?
You know, this reminds me of your tunnel on Val in that game.In post 1053, Lukewarm wrote:If Tanner tells me and Ari to vote for you, I am pretty sure that Ari will do it, so I feel like I would need to prempt that atm
And, I can see why you might think this would make you seem townie, but this does not ke me feel better about you here. Basically it feels like you are avoiding committing to a read on either one of us :/In post 1043, Pavowski wrote:If I get forced to vote, I'm polling the room and voting with the majority. I am not gonna be responsible for blowing the Keep when I'm really struggling with these two.In post 1040, imaginality wrote:I feel surest about Ari being town and Luke has said he thinks Ari's town so if it's entirely my call I'd get Luke to vote Ari.
If we do the 'get the scummiest player to choose who to vote' thing I'd get Pav to choose between the other two.
You can hold me to this.
In post 468, Aristeia wrote:?In post 463, Pavowski wrote:We don't have to get scum here, we just have to find town. This is easy and makes me think even more that Luke is scum, because I know he thinks (knows) he can look townier than me.
If you think Luke is scum why wouldn't you just vote for me?
Do you think Luke is bluffing about voting for me to convince you to vote for him?
These posts came across as buddying up to Luke and/or trying to leverage the fight between Pav and Luke to get a vote with a direct ask from Pav.In post 473, Aristeia wrote:Luke does seem very earnest and honest though
Here Ari is doing her cutesy schtick with Luke.In post 491, Aristeia wrote:gosh it would really be quite cheeky of Luke to steal Tanner's spot in the keep and then pocket me and get me to vote for him.
mmmmhmm
Now Ari says she's not going to vote unless Tanner says so. (this is important in a bit).In post 492, Aristeia wrote:I don't think I'm going to vote unless Tanner tells me it's ok to trust that person
This read to me like imaginality trying to nudge the game to put the deciding vote in Pav's hands, just as Pav and Luke were kind of calling each other scummy. In my notes, I described this as "seed planting". To me, the idea here is to try to set up Ari!scum the best possible chance to get the vote by leveraging Luke and Pav's distrust for each other. It's a subtle thing and I could be tinfoiling, but I really don't understand the point of imaginality's question. It's not scumhunting. So what's the point of it?In post 534, imaginality wrote:In post 468, Aristeia wrote:In post 463, Pavowski wrote:
We don't have to get scum here, we just have to find town. This is easy and makes me think even more that Luke is scum, because I know he thinks (knows) he can look townier than me.
?
If you think Luke is scum why wouldn't you just vote for me?
Do you think Luke is bluffing about voting for me to convince you to vote for him?
@Ari, it sounds from this like you think Pav should have the voting power in Keep rather than you or Luke, is that right?
This is how Ari responds to that post from imaginality...and this is kind of key because now Ari is saying she'll vote when she's sure of her reads. Well that runs in complete contradiction to just earlier when she said she would only vote who Tanner said. I think Ari is trying to sound pro-town by saying she'll let Tanner decide, but in reality, she is looking for whatever angle she can get to win.In post 535, Aristeia wrote:I don't think of the Keep that way.In post 534, imaginality wrote:@Ari, it sounds from this like you think Pav should have the voting power in Keep rather than you or Luke, is that right?
If I get to 100% sure of the solution I will not hesitate to vote.
This comment from Ari also struck me as weird. It's a complete softball meant to make imaginality look like he is some weakling against big bad VP. I don't see how this question is helping Ari determine alignments. Again, I would see this as Imaginality and Ari trying to shape public opinion around in each other in a positive way that helps the other win their games.In post 536, Aristeia wrote:Imaginality how prepared would you say you were for this 1v1?
Absolutely not. I think you can feel the townvibes coming off me, but you're (rightly) nervous to take the leap.In post 1056, Tanner wrote:pav, should i be concerned that your response to my "i lowkey want pav voted but he hasn't convinced me he's town" was basically "lol you should do it tho"
Welcome to the party!In post 1059, RH9 wrote:Anybody want anything from me?
Yeah, to my post above, this is exactly what I'm saying.In post 1040, imaginality wrote:I feel surest about Ari being town and Luke has said he thinks Ari's town so if it's entirely my call I'd get Luke to vote Ari.
If we do the 'get the scummiest player to choose who to vote' thing I'd get Pav to choose between the other two.
Welcome to the game!In post 1059, RH9 wrote:Anybody want anything from me?
haha. I swear my avi makes people think I'm an asshole. So this is good news.In post 1064, Tanner wrote:this is not really game related but i've been thinking about it for a bit - baltar's avatar is really aesthetically pleasing when paired with the sepia forum skin i have on this account
You know, it does kinda, even though I like the avatar and you seem like a good dude. I think it's the cigarette.In post 1066, VP Baltar wrote:haha. I swear my avi makes people think I'm an asshole. So this is good news.
Ok, I lol'dIn post 1068, Tanner wrote:*summoning imaginality*
In post 1057, VP Baltar wrote:ok, Tanner, this might be kind of jumbled because it was kind of a vibey thing I was picking up last night as I was rereading, but I'm going to pull some of these posts between Ari and imaginality that just hit me as partnery or Ari trying to weasel into a power position.
In post 468, Aristeia wrote:?In post 463, Pavowski wrote:We don't have to get scum here, we just have to find town. This is easy and makes me think even more that Luke is scum, because I know he thinks (knows) he can look townier than me.
If you think Luke is scum why wouldn't you just vote for me?
Do you think Luke is bluffing about voting for me to convince you to vote for him?These posts came across as buddying up to Luke and/or trying to leverage the fight between Pav and Luke to get a vote with a direct ask from Pav.In post 473, Aristeia wrote:Luke does seem very earnest and honest though
Here Ari is doing her cutesy schtick with Luke.In post 491, Aristeia wrote:gosh it would really be quite cheeky of Luke to steal Tanner's spot in the keep and then pocket me and get me to vote for him.
mmmmhmm
Now Ari says she's not going to vote unless Tanner says so. (this is important in a bit).In post 492, Aristeia wrote:I don't think I'm going to vote unless Tanner tells me it's ok to trust that person
This read to me like imaginality trying to nudge the game to put the deciding vote in Pav's hands, just as Pav and Luke were kind of calling each other scummy. In my notes, I described this as "seed planting". To me, the idea here is to try to set up Ari!scum the best possible chance to get the vote by leveraging Luke and Pav's distrust for each other. It's a subtle thing and I could be tinfoiling, but I really don't understand the point of imaginality's question. It's not scumhunting. So what's the point of it?In post 534, imaginality wrote:In post 468, Aristeia wrote:In post 463, Pavowski wrote:
We don't have to get scum here, we just have to find town. This is easy and makes me think even more that Luke is scum, because I know he thinks (knows) he can look townier than me.
?
If you think Luke is scum why wouldn't you just vote for me?
Do you think Luke is bluffing about voting for me to convince you to vote for him?
@Ari, it sounds from this like you think Pav should have the voting power in Keep rather than you or Luke, is that right?
This is how Ari responds to that post from imaginality...and this is kind of key because now Ari is saying she'll vote when she's sure of her reads. Well that runs in complete contradiction to just earlier when she said she would only vote who Tanner said. I think Ari is trying to sound pro-town by saying she'll let Tanner decide, but in reality, she is looking for whatever angle she can get to win.In post 535, Aristeia wrote:I don't think of the Keep that way.In post 534, imaginality wrote:@Ari, it sounds from this like you think Pav should have the voting power in Keep rather than you or Luke, is that right?
If I get to 100% sure of the solution I will not hesitate to vote.
This comment from Ari also struck me as weird. It's a complete softball meant to make imaginality look like he is some weakling against big bad VP. I don't see how this question is helping Ari determine alignments. Again, I would see this as Imaginality and Ari trying to shape public opinion around in each other in a positive way that helps the other win their games.In post 536, Aristeia wrote:Imaginality how prepared would you say you were for this 1v1?
This is subtle stuff and maybe I'm confbiasing myself since I know imaginality is scum, but their actions toward each other don't read like there is town!Ari in the mix. It is coordinated and kid gloves.