Mafiascum.net

In post 824, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: ircher

*kicks back and relaxes without much elaboration or enthusiasm*

In post 828, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The Roden push, i think it’s good. Counterwagons are always informative, but i’m personally not as convinced that’d flip scum as i am Ircher.
So i’m still arguing the same thing because i don’t see any reason to switch and other wagons suggested so far haven’t been interesting to me.
If anyone disagrees eith me there, that is awesome. But make yourself heard, or i’m just gonna try to run the show. Because i don’t like messing around.

In post 834, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:nahhhhh bears this Norwegian shit is townposting at its finest but thanksfor playing loooooooooool

In post 849, Arcade Pals wrote:VOTE: Roden

Out of the three wagons, I would vote here. I feel like Ircher has been talked about enough that I don't really think the reasons they're being wolfread are enough for me to join and quite frankly, having our vote be on them would feel rather stale so let's spice it up a little. lol Mastina

In post 859, Greeting wrote:

In post 690, The Three Bears wrote:I'm out today. Noraa can pass me messages. I may have left Noraa instructions for things. I may not have. Noraa can use my name for any reaction test she wishes and I'll correct later if needed. I'd like to see how you treat me when you're not sure if it's me or Noraa. I think Noraa would like that too.

~Mama

Not sure. It depends how Noraa used (or didn't use the ability).

~Mama

Okay and this experiment will give us what exactly? There's already enough fluff and unnecessary confusion in this game.

In post 923, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 896, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Bell/Norw/STD/LLD are never scum here.

maybe mush is scum after all. this is such a reach-y read. i dont believe that is all town and i cant imagine mush thinking that. mostly just the word 'never' makes it too extreme.

-babbie bear

In post 934, NorwegianboyEE wrote:They can’t catch up to the game. But just so "happens" to show up immediately when their name is mentioned.

In post 953, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The mod closed the thread too. Do you think they would do that if it was an planned move from scum PT?

In post 1056, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 934, NorwegianboyEE wrote:They can’t catch up to the game. But just so "happens" to show up immediately when their name is mentioned.

Agreed but wasn't it you who said the Ircher wagon was a stalled scum wagon? If you feel this way, why change?

~Mama

In post 1010, mastina wrote:

In post 651, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Three Bears, Mastina and Mush is my block of trusted individuals ATM.
More applications are welcome.

Well, {Bell, StD} for a start are obvious.
{Tet, tictac, Malakittens} are also solid additions.

Plus LLD's basically modslipped conftown, so can be added as well.

In post 1024, Andante wrote:

In post 1022, Toogeloo wrote:VOTE: MegA

Yeah, ok.

cause this feels like maf

In post 1032, Andante wrote:I still SR Arcade more. suspicious posts vs lost Meg? Arcade is maf...

In post 1041, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1011, Roden wrote:We argued sure but I don't think we're on the same wavelength. I don't understand the crux of your argument, or at least I don't understand why you think my behavior comes from scum.

you said a thing, you backtracked on thing, instead of answering points against you, you discredited the argument which is something scum does because they can't argue normally because they come from a place of untruth. you dropped ATE which looks scummy as hell to try and divert suspicion off of you.

In post 1011, Roden wrote:The only thing I kind of get is the backtrack/backpedal argument but I don't really agree with it. I don't like the idea that backpedaling is scummy, it would be one thing if I never gave a solid read ever but that wasn't what happened. I gave some shotgun reads a little over 24 hours into the game and even said they weren't solid but wanted to get my starting thoughts out there. But I'm not going to be receptive to adjusting my reads or acknowledging a scum case on me, if the reaction to seeing me go back on a read is to call it backpedaling and tell me I'm scummy for backpedaling. Like, I'm just going to fight it and not even say I'm backpedaling if you're going to frame it as scummy, and it isn't really reasonable to believe I should react differently. I'm just never going say I'm doing "X Act" when someone says "X Act" is scummy, that's just my initial reaction to everything, if not outright arguing against the notion the "X Act" is scummy.

the point was to prove you were backpedalling, i don't really care how you fight it. saying x and y were related and then jumping back is testing the waters as scum and then realizing you made a mistake, that's the way i see it. town doesn't need to backpedal because they tell the truth

In post 1011, Roden wrote:Especially since it puts me in a situation where I'm being called scummy for backpedaling but also scummy for not admitting I'm backpedaling.

wrong. all you had to do was explain why you backpedaled. you failed to do that.

In post 658, Greeting wrote:

In post 606, Roden wrote:VOTE: Galron

I didn't post between 559 and this. What's changed so you're no longer voting me?

In post 1069, Roden wrote:Also you and Ceph both beetlejuicing and attacking me back to back looks sus and organized as fuck. No idea why you're going out of your way to make yourself look as scummy as possible in pushing my mis-elim if you're scum, but if you're both town this death tunnel makes even less sense. So I have no idea what to make of it.

Either way you've been given multiple reasons and explanations for why I'm town, and not just from me but from others as well, and you've just chosen to ignore it to keep calling me scum no matter what is said. If you don't want to honestly engage with me on this then I don't particularly feel guilty engaging with you just as honestly.

In post 1071, Roden wrote:

@STD and Ceph:

What do you think about Ircher vs Meg?