Page 44 of 100
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:06 pm
by populartajo
scotmany12 wrote:populartajo wrote:Because the objective of this game is to catch scum not catch useless players.
And yet you were seemingly fine for when people were wagoning Jebus. Infact, you voted for him.
populartajo wrote:Unvote Vote Jebus.
So what, when Jebus was useless it was scummy? But it's not scummy when qwints is useless?
Misrepresentation. I didnt vote Jebus for being useless.
populartajo wrote:Jebus staying away and avoiding this zwet situation is scummy.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:08 pm
by populartajo
Also I have a gutty weak town read on qwints for some posts after zwet's death.
But I like how you took the effort to make me look bad.
Fos:Scotmany.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:09 pm
by scotmany12
populartajo wrote:scotmany12 wrote:populartajo wrote:Because the objective of this game is to catch scum not catch useless players.
And yet you were seemingly fine for when people were wagoning Jebus. Infact, you voted for him.
populartajo wrote:Unvote Vote Jebus.
So what, when Jebus was useless it was scummy? But it's not scummy when qwints is useless?
Misrepresentation. I didnt vote Jebus for being useless.
populartajo wrote:Jebus staying away and avoiding this zwet situation is scummy.
That still doesn't change the fact that you did not speak up against the Jebus wagon when people were voting for him for lurking. He was being useless, but you didn't have a problem with people voting for him.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:10 pm
by populartajo
Qwints is a total different situation than Jebus. Period.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:21 pm
by sam.samhorn
hasdgfas wrote:sam.samhorn wrote:Look at this scummy post.
so why is it scummy?
Because the only thing you can come up with after pages of accusations on you as well as your being absent for many days is a "long" post with a whole bunch of short, useless comments and questions. You're trying to participate, instead of participating. This doesn't help your cause in the least.
My vote is not moving from hasdgfas, no matter what the deadline is.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:31 pm
by Xylthixlm
crywolf20084 wrote:qwints wrote:Acknowliding prod. I don't have much of an opinion at this point, but it's obvious cow is doing whatever he can to stay alive.
this is useless post number 18, out of the fourty pages of play.
....
I changed my mind.
unvote, vote qwints
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 pm
by OhGodMyLife
Vote Count:
9 to lynch
qwints: 7 (Kmd4390, Yosarian2, crywolf20084, camn, DrippingGoofball, hasdgfas, Xylthixlm)
hasdgfas: 4 (scotmany12, populartajo, sam.samhorn, qwints)
stark: 2 (Caboose, Tarhalindur)
Tarhalindur: 1 (farside22)
Not Voting: 3 (stark, Korejora, Rogueben)
DEADLINE: Tuesday March 3rd, 10:00 PM EST
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:52 pm
by Korejora
Midterm's passed, but I've got three significant assignment deadlines and another midterm in the next week, so I'm not going to be able to read very thoroughly.
I'll see what I can do about catching up a little over the weekend.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:53 pm
by hasdgfas
populartajo wrote:Misrepresentation. I didnt vote Jebus for being useless.
populartajo wrote:Jebus staying away and avoiding this zwet situation is scummy.
tajo, how is that not voting for being useless?
sam.samhorn wrote:hasdgfas wrote:sam.samhorn wrote:Look at this scummy post.
so why is it scummy?
Because the only thing you can come up with after pages of accusations on you as well as your being absent for many days is a "long" post with a whole bunch of short, useless comments and questions. You're trying to participate, instead of participating. This doesn't help your cause in the least.
My vote is not moving from hasdgfas, no matter what the deadline is.
It's how I like to catch up. Stream-of-consciousness, commenting on things I see and asking questions as I see them or have questions. It's not like I didn't comment on my thoughts of people based on that afterwards.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:28 pm
by farside22
I'm sorry the day's are getting away from me. I know x will vote for me for saying this but it's just busy RL things.
I'm still reading and will have something soonish.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:39 pm
by Kmd4390
Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:41 pm
by farside22
Kmd4390 wrote:Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
Original Roll String: 1d2
1 2-Sided Dice: (1) = 1
Whoever that lands on? Seriously I need to read the game to see what I missed. Last time I checked I was voting qwints.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:42 pm
by Kmd4390
You're voting Tar.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:47 pm
by stark
Kmd4390 wrote:Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
What's the case against qwints again?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:49 pm
by Kmd4390
stark wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
What's the case against qwints again?
If you were paying attention, you'd know. Go through my post history and see where I quote the original and add a couple of points. That's my latest case on him.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:56 pm
by farside22
Kmd4390 wrote:You're voting Tar.
Sigh. I really need to read this game.
unvote
till I read.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:00 pm
by populartajo
farside22 wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:You're voting Tar.
Sigh. I really need to read this game.
unvote
till I read.
LYNCH HARRRR!
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:11 pm
by camn
sam.samhorn wrote:My vote is not moving from hasdgfas, no matter what the deadline is.
If you had to choose between a no-lynch and a Qwints lynch, what would you choose.. and why?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:11 pm
by stark
Kmd4390 wrote:stark wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
What's the case against qwints again?
If you were paying attention, you'd know. Go through my post history and see where I quote the original and add a couple of points. That's my latest case on him.
Ok. About how sure are you in regards to qwints. 86-93%?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:13 pm
by Kmd4390
stark wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:stark wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:Caboose, Tar, Farside, Stark, Kore, Rogue- Who is scummier? Qwints or Cow?
What's the case against qwints again?
If you were paying attention, you'd know. Go through my post history and see where I quote the original and add a couple of points. That's my latest case on him.
Ok. About how sure are you in regards to qwints. 86-93%?
I wish I could be THAT sure in a mafia game with no extra information. I'm about 10-15% sure. Far more sure than I am on any other player, hence the vote.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:30 pm
by Caboose
@Kmd: Cow is scummier.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:42 pm
by stark
I think I would like to see a qwints claim before I put him at -1
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:12 pm
by populartajo
You are late to the party comrade.
Why dont you read the game first or at least isolate the player that you want to put at L-1?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:13 pm
by populartajo
hasdgfas wrote:populartajo wrote:Misrepresentation. I didnt vote Jebus for being useless.
populartajo wrote:Jebus staying away and avoiding this zwet situation is scummy.
tajo, how is that not voting for being useless?
Wait, what? Cant you spot the difference?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:06 pm
by hasdgfas
populartajo wrote:hasdgfas wrote:populartajo wrote:Misrepresentation. I didnt vote Jebus for being useless.
populartajo wrote:Jebus staying away and avoiding this zwet situation is scummy.
tajo, how is that not voting for being useless?
Wait, what? Cant you spot the difference?
You're voting Jebus for not doing anything. That looks to me like voting for being useless. Did you mean something else by it?