Mafiascum.net

MagnaofIllusion wrote:

@Admiral

– I scanned your ISO and saw where you claimed flavor but couldn’t find specific game and flavor roles. Can you flesh that out?

From my iso 3:

ThAdmiral wrote:Basically I was really angry the arkons killed a bunch of my fellow humans in an ambush and as a result I plan to take the law in to my own hands to, and I'm paraphrasing here, fuck their shit up.
There's also some background stuff about me being a good soldier and whatnot.

To flesh it out more I am an exceptional soldier. This has lead me to feel superior to my superiors who I think are a bit weak-willed. The ambush by the arkons is the final straw and as a result I decide to go outside the chain of command and deliver my own justice.

I can kill every night with a military flavor, which I am allowed to suggest.

P.S. Not that it matters, but I'm a Morale Operative. Hihi.

chesskid3 wrote:

Thor665 wrote:

chesskid3 wrote:Thor is scum
Camn is scum

When did camm become town good enough to sheep?

While we're at it compare what I claimed for flavor and what camm claimed for flavor and explain why mine is worse.

OH HEY LOOK SHE DID IT TOO THEREFORE IT'S OK?
Oh hey you're scum yup.

OH HEY LOOK, THE PERSON YOU CALLED SCUM BUT NOW SUDDENLY CLAIM IS TOWN WORTH SHEEPING DID IT THEREFORE I WANT TO KNOW WHY IT'S OKAY FOR HER AND NOT ME.
Oh hey, you're VI. Yup.

MagnaofIllusion wrote:

@Thor

– Since you seem interesting in clarifying reads I ask you the following –

Who are your top scum suspects?

You, camm, and Hacker. (no particular order there)

I was actually more suspicious of Slaxx/chess until you defended him - if you guys are buddies I don't think you'd bother, and if you're not buddies the VI meta awareness explains a lot of the jitteriness I'm getting from the slot. Also I'm a little nervous of AGM's slide onto chess because 3/4ths of the case he noted is all pretty derpy stuff that I would expect scum to lie about rather than admit as chess has done and seeing it typed out like that made me reassess my own chessscum read.

Thor665 wrote:Those claims tends to make me less suspicious of MoI and ThAs.

@camm - I'm an idiot, so no, what do you see?

Why does MoI's claim make you less suspicious of him?

Camn - unless I missed it, there's been no explanation from you about what you saw.

@Huck - his role makes sense to me as far as game balance and PR spread goes.

2 doc types.
1 tracker/investigative type
2 unconfirmed recruiting neighbors

Pretty weak town for the number of players.

Add in a role that can protect itself and a Vig and it looks like a solid town.

Also - in going back to look at my win condition (and this is slightly embarrassing - but it's shameful for all of town too) my win condition involves removing Arkons, not threats to humanity. So, ThAd as Arkon with extra kill ability? Don't buy it. And now ThAd isn't 3rd party (or if he is he's 3rd party I'm all for, because I can still win and so can he as long as we kill the Arkons first - huzzah for my side)

how is the case "derpy," all the arguments are true. you're basically just saying, "he's acting too obviously stupid to be scum," which is a TERRIBLE conclusion.

AlmasterGM wrote:how is the case "derpy," all the arguments are true. you're basically just saying, "he's acting too obviously stupid to be scum," which is a TERRIBLE conclusion.

More or less than "he's so stupidly scummy he has to be scum"? If the tells you're picking up say stupid, than they don't say scum or town. I seriously don't see scum as very likely to come into a game, announce they read five pages, and then proudly state they don't see a need to read more. If we really have an issue with him we can vig him, but I frankly think there are better lynches to make.

Could you expand on the Slaxx = scummy part of your case.
Also please address how you think chess' postings are really helping him if he's scum.

I DIDN'T CLAIM SHE WAS TOWN I THINK SHE'S SCUM GOSH.
I GOT MY READS CONFUSED LOLZ

Yes.
And then you turned around and acted like me noticing your mixed up reads was proof that I was scum, and you did it in all caps to prove your brilliance and didn't seem to notice the problem with thinking that.
Your reads aren't that good right now - I advocate reading an additional 5 pages and coming back with what you get from that.

Why don't you think Hacker is scummy?

Thor665 wrote:

chesskid3 wrote:

Thor665 wrote:

chesskid3 wrote:Thor is scum
Camn is scum

When did camm become town good enough to sheep?

While we're at it compare what I claimed for flavor and what camm claimed for flavor and explain why mine is worse.

OH HEY LOOK SHE DID IT TOO THEREFORE IT'S OK?
Oh hey you're scum yup.

OH HEY LOOK, THE PERSON YOU CALLED SCUM BUT NOW SUDDENLY CLAIM IS TOWN WORTH SHEEPING DID IT THEREFORE I WANT TO KNOW WHY IT'S OKAY FOR HER AND NOT ME.
Oh hey, you're VI. Yup.

MagnaofIllusion wrote:

@Thor

– Since you seem interesting in clarifying reads I ask you the following –

Who are your top scum suspects?

You, camm, and Hacker. (no particular order there)

I was actually more suspicious of Slaxx/chess until you defended him - if you guys are buddies I don't think you'd bother, and if you're not buddies the VI meta awareness explains a lot of the jitteriness I'm getting from the slot. Also I'm a little nervous of AGM's slide onto chess because 3/4ths of the case he noted is all pretty derpy stuff that I would expect scum to lie about rather than admit as chess has done and seeing it typed out like that made me reassess my own chessscum read.

That's not me calling you scum for poitning out I mixed up my reads. that's me thinking you're scum for saying "hey look camn's flavor sucks too"

You called me scum for doing 'X'
A player you had previously called scum and now called town worth sheeping had also done 'X'
I asked for clarification about 'X' as a scumtell.

I call that scumhunting - if you want to call it scummy I suppose that's your prerogative, but you're very wrong.

@chess.

Thor665 wrote:Why don't you think Hacker is scummy?

oh i see where you are coming from.

Hacker just is, man. I can read his ISO for vibes if you want, but he's town.
Maybe you are town, but at least one of you and camn is scum sooooo

Why is it definitely me or camm? As I'm town this would be great news because I could gurantee put a vote on scum - tell me plz.
Hacker is town because he just is? So, gut - check.

because my scumreads aren't going to be 0/2

chesskid please, just post for me in ONE POST WHY CAMM IS SCUM.

then, IN A DIFFERENT POST, say why Thor is scum.

I don't care if all you do is requote what you already said. JUST DO IT.

OR DONT YOU WANT TO BECAUSE YOU KNOW IT WILL LOOK LIKE A LAME ONE-LINER? HMMMMMM?

Here's the deal:
Imagine you were a scum neighbor.
How would you act in thread?
Would you distance yourself from your partner... Knowing they were town?
Would you ignore them?

I think neither.
I think you would see it as a perfect chance to buddy up with them... Safely.
If someone called you out on it, eventually you could admit that you WERE in fact linked.
So I think scum definately doesnt ignore their partner. They try to, as subtly as possible, LINK themselves to the town via the partnership.

Town, on the other hand, truly has no knowledge of their partner's alignment. Thus they would play with the natural wariness any townie would have. They may crumb the connection.. But not just implicitly trust the person... And definitely not buddy up.

Does anyone disagree?

I don't disagree, but why does this matter?

I'll go justify my scumread on Camn tomorrow.

Thor is scum because of his bullshit dana wagon vote

O RLY?

How did we go from this:

It's all in that post I had.

to this:

I'll go justify my scumread on Camn tomorrow.

Well I went and looked and it wasn't there.

SOMEHOW.
WHATEVER IT WAS IS IN THE FIRST 5 PAGES THOUGH

Also, explain to me how one bullshit vote = scum.

Because it was reallllllllllllllllly bullshit.
Camn was a stronger read, iirc. Almost certainly willing to go for camn over thor, pending rereading the first 5-10 pages

Fine. Why aren't you VOTING FOR HIM THEN?