Mafiascum.net

In post 1074, T S O wrote:

In post 1053, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:

In post 1051, MafiaSSK wrote:

In post 1050, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:

In post 1044, MafiaSSK wrote:

In post 1038, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:

vote ssk...

I know that I get hated on for posting shit like this, but why? I know you changed the vote, but what troubled you about my posts?

Did I say anything about your posts, nope, not a thing. I cast a direction for a vote, picked a thread to pull on and here we are, reverberation.

But a vote means you think I'm scum and the only reason you could think that would be because of my posts unless reasons, so it's logical to assume that there was some post of mine that bothered you. But now I know that it was just a shitty vote. Unless you want to prove me different.

being an alien to these parts, the value and definition of what is stated and voted is varied. To one a vote is precious, to another a vote but a tool. All are suspect and some gain favor, others ill, the rub is which gains ring true and which are false. All in the sorting. All in time. One answer, then another, and soon we hold true or false. It is the use of the many tools that lead to the sorting, not just the one.

I'd be up for a policy lynch here also.

In post 1077, T S O wrote:How the fuck would repeatedly spouting mindless philosophy instead of answering questions be related to your time spent as Mafiascum?

In post 532, Antihero wrote:

In post 520, Jordan_Downey wrote:Anti you are the only person continuing to bring up the hydra comment. Maybe on sign up he didn't realize how many? He also didn't try pressing the issue, didn't try to press a vote. Yet you keep bringing it up ... Why?

well, he's pressing the issue by continuing the vote. ...and the only alternative explanation is that he's voting us because of something personal (which is even harder to stomach).

that's where i'm at now, so why are you all acting so surprised that i'm pissed off?

In post 537, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:

In post 531, Spring Starflower wrote:wait... there ate 8/12 votes on Necro already?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!?!?!?!?!??!

i did not notice that!!

yes, interesting is it not, of particular the 3 that hopped on once I started poking at Necro...well on is aegor, and then there are the other 2...
too interesting to make a change in course at this point...

In post 1038, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote: being an alien to these parts, the value and definition of what is stated and voted is varied. To one a vote is precious, to another a vote but a tool. All are suspect and some gain favor, others ill, the rub is which gains ring true and which are false. All in the sorting. All in time. One answer, then another, and soon we hold true or false. It is the use of the many tools that lead to the sorting, not just the one.

In post 563, Spring Starflower wrote:

In post 560, Aegor wrote:

In post 556, Spring Starflower wrote:Jordan_Downey (Jingle/Aphix)


never heard of these people, damn no meta

Scum meta for Jordan, in which game I also drew after hardclaiming scum.

i'll refer to these later in the game when jordan has more posts in this game

In post 641, T S O wrote:My catch-up will be stream of consciousness yay

#36 gives me my first scumread of the game in Xayzeck - I've seen him as both alignments and the OMGUS part doesn't fit with my memories of town-Xay.
#46 makes me wonder why mastin tells TMCT that he's voting him because he thinks he's scum, and then reminds TMCT he's not sold on town-him ...yes, mastin, we'd assume that.
#63 is more weirdness from Xayzeck - getting a feeling I'm onto something here.
#68 reminds me of an entrance I've used as scum trying to appear as emphatic town.
#74 is better, though, but they're a decent hydra, so I'm not sure if I want to clear them or ugh idek.
#86 makes me think mastin's a brazen motherfucker as either alignment, but to do that as scum? Not sure I see it.

Yeah, fuck it, mastin can be town, he's so damn likeable I feel it hard to call him scum, plus he's town.

#101 Xayzeck is officially scumfuck #1.
#112 SHEEP SCUMZECK SHEEP

Vote: Xayzeck

This needs to be done now, don't care what happens down the line.

#118 hey brah it's you who's scum
#147 YES NATI VOTE XAYZECK <333 but we may have to talk 'bout mastin
#169 Xayzeck suspicion is good, Dry-fit.
#170 Zdenek looking good here as well although I disagree with him, his manner is town
#179 is town as fuck plus Xayzeck vote - I declare Zdenek INNOCENT CHILD DAY 1.
#180 it's Saki, friend, what could you expect?
#184 no SSK, bad SSK.

more Xayzeck being scum, especially #199

#203 hang this fucker now
#206 YES ANTI
#212 what history?
#238 good point, Doublade!

That's up to page 10 - will further catch up later.

In post 1062, Xayzeck wrote:

In post 1059, Thor665 wrote:I think he wants to solve the game.

I honestly don't get that kind of impression

He just comes in and yells for a random tunnel, when we haven't even interacted.

Hell, I don't even feel like he's been pushing me. It just feels like he's come in, SEEN me do stuff, called me scum for it, and told other people that they should vote me.

I can't even remember 1 moment in this whole game where he has actually talked TO me, and not ABOUT me.

That's not sorting people out.

In post 1068, RachMarie wrote:I guess I was not clear enough Thor

I have Xay in my town pile. I will not vote for him unless there is no choice because of deadline.

I have a strong scum read on Pere. Part of it is based on experience with him in several games, part of it is associative tells and wagons.

In post 1072, RachMarie wrote:uggh strike that part of associative tells wrong game

Sorry I need more coffee

In post 1082, T S O wrote:

In post 1038, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote: being an alien to these parts, the value and definition of what is stated and voted is varied. To one a vote is precious, to another a vote but a tool. All are suspect and some gain favor, others ill, the rub is which gains ring true and which are false. All in the sorting. All in time. One answer, then another, and soon we hold true or false. It is the use of the many tools that lead to the sorting, not just the one.

In post 1085, Thor665 wrote:What's up with your vote? You really think that's going anywhere? What sort of sorting are you doing as regards it?

In post 943, Dry-fit wrote:Aegor is a perfect compromise lynch. Does anyone here have a townread on him?

In post 1058, talah wrote:

In post 1048, Dry-fit wrote:

In post 1040, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:4 days to go-need consolidation and off on xay now...

vote Aegor

So what's your problem with the Xay wagon?

After Talah's last post I wouldn't mind lynching them.

1/ What's your case *for* the Xay wagon?

talah wrote:2/ Good for you, champ, why don't you flop down a vote? What exactly was your problem with my last post and what were you previously thinking about me anyway?

In post 1092, Aegor wrote:Dry-fit is a better wagon than Xay

In post 943, Dry-fit wrote:Aegor is a perfect compromise lynch. Does anyone here have a townread on him?

This is such crap given that he has done exactly nothing all game.

In post 1094, Dry-fit wrote:I don't know what your point is here.

In post 1093, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:Necro wagon is dumb

In post 1094, Dry-fit wrote:I don't have one. I wanted to know why SKOT is voting Aegor over Xay when he expressed suspicion of Xay the last time he'd mentioned him and hadn't really said anything about Aegor.

In post 1094, Dry-fit wrote:My problem with your Pere vote is that it's unexplained, on a not very good target, and does nothing in this gamestate. What I was thinking about you before was that your posting in general was scummy but that your softclaim didn't look scum motivated or a likely scum move at all. In addition I thought you didn't respond well to mastin's meta case on you but I just kind of skimmed that. I prefer my vote on Aegor.