Mafiascum.net

Pretty sure there's more to it then that. I've always had to copy the link and Use URL brackets

[1073]

Doesn't work

I'm actually impressed that TwoFace didn't understand what Naomi was saying.

you put the word post in brackets, then the post number, then /post in brackets.

Woah, really? Holy shit, I've been copying the URL and chopping half of it off for ages.
1075
^test

Also, @mort I gave you my thoughts on you and naomi recently.

Yeah I saw. As I said earlier I don't see her push as Red! motivated so I agree with your conclusion, even if some of the things you said are wrong. Thanks.

I might press Naomi on some parts of it but I'd much, much rather see her push another lynch than defend her push of mine.

In post 1072, MortFeld wrote:Hi ArcAngel! I think your slot has looked pretty objectively Red but I at least am very open minded and mindful of TB's noobness affecting his play. See 779 for a summary of my thoughts at that point - they've changed somewhat since then. Looking forward to you catching up tomorrow.

In post 1073, Human Sequencer wrote:Yo arcangel.
You're looking pretty red at the moment, I do hate to say.
Good luck.

Yo!
Thanks for the heads-up. I have to catch up first. Its always the same story. Replacements are scapegoats

Learn something new every day

In post 1078, MortFeld wrote:I'd much, much rather see her push another lynch than defend her push of mine.

Yeah this. We've got a lot of information now and that deadline is something we now have to consider. We should all be working on sifting through the info we have and getting a target or more sorted.

I notice you haven't voted, HS. Why not? And if you were to vote, who would it be for?

Done till page 5 - A Lot of newbies i can see.

I actually town read creeps. He is just a bad player not scum. That bandwagon on him was bad.
Naomi could be town too. I also town read couple other but will make decision down the road.

I have scum read on TwoFace. He looks like he is playing on everyone side.

In post 1084, keyenpeydee wrote:

I'm tired of searching replacements. I'll give Nero Cain until tomorrow

Awww. Dont replace nero. He is a very good player but he does have a habit of flaking. He is an old friend

@Mort
I know this goes against what I said just then, but I'm waiting for the V/LA wave to end and I'm waiting for replacements to catch up. Also, voting for people who just replaced in makes me feel bad.

If it weren't for that, I'd probably park my vote on TB's (ArcAngel) slot.

Let it be known that if a wagon picks up for any of these slots, I'd be on board for a lynch;
Kamelot, ArcAngel, Creeps
I could probably be convinced over on Wobbs and Nero, but I'm not entirely sure. It'd have to be a good case.

>inb4 kamelot, arcangel, creeps scumteam
You heard it here first folks!

fugg

better for comedic effect

In post 1087, Human Sequencer wrote:@Mort
I know this goes against what I said just then, but I'm waiting for the V/LA wave to end and I'm waiting for replacements to catch up. Also, voting for people who just replaced in makes me feel bad.

If it weren't for that, I'd probably park my vote on TB's (ArcAngel) slot.

Let it be known that if a wagon picks up for any of these slots, I'd be on board for a lynch;
Kamelot, ArcAngel, Creeps
I could probably be convinced over on Wobbs and Nero, but I'm not entirely sure. It'd have to be a good case.

Wobbs - the only thing making you think he's Green is the post where he acknowledges his reasoning was bad? And for the slot, you keep saying Copper looked Green, can you go into that more? His methodology for suspecting me and TF looked off to me.

Nero - I mean, zero content, apparently getting modkilled.

Creeps - I'd rather worry about him tomorrow.

I would be very happy with a Road lynch. They're V/LA, I'm not sure for how long. They've misrepped multiple times and their only content is saying they don't think certain wagons are good. I don't think they've read the thread save for maybe ISOing one or two people.

To clarify - Road being V/LA is not a reason I suspect them, it's one of the reasons I haven't voted them for refusing to interact with me.

In post 0, keyenpeydee wrote:4. Please be active. As a general guideline, one post every 48 hours is the bare minimum.

In post 0, keyenpeydee wrote:1. If you have not posted in 48 hours, I will see if you have any prods. If you do, I will replace you. If you don't I will prod you.

In post 0, keyenpeydee wrote:

Activity

3. I may replace players at any time if I see they are just posting to avoid prods

and are not really playing the game.

^^^

Wobbs isn't a green read. All of my green read comes from Copper. Wobbs looks like a fool to be honest, his misrepping is horrible. This is why I'd need a case.
The copper greenread is mostly because of the effort he put into gamesolving.
He acted consistently within himself, as in he never had a contradiction of motive or otherwise. His opinions logically changed when he found reason to (see post 159) and in his argument with you and TwoFace, he picked his side and stuck with it.
His analysis of scum likely opportunistically jumping on his wagon is very credible, and my read of his argument with you and TF screams TvTT to me.
Posts like 429 and [post]463] just don't come from scum in my eyes, especially the latter which is filled with logically consistent reads that coincide with what he's expressed recently.

Yeah Nero it sucks you're sick but you aren't playing

In post 1094, keyenpeydee wrote:Lol okay. Fine. I hope you get well soon and be able to play the game

I'm still sick but I'm feeling better than I was 3 days ago so I'm going to try to get in some work today and I'll go to the doctor Monday if its still going on.

I can't be sick in bed and be sitting on the computer at the same time.

In post 1098, Nero Cain wrote:I can't be sick in bed and be sitting on the computer at the same time.

Completely understand but deadline is in 5 days so I'm pretty much assuming you won't have contributed much by then.