Mafiascum.net

In post 985, Gentleman 4 wrote:I... this might be a question that just goes unanswered, but if you have a response, I'd love to hear it; what about Gentleman 3's early posting seemed honest to you?

Speaking of G4, I dont think I answered this as I went to bed.

I cant give you specifics but I thought like L9, G3 stayed pretty active and i thought the posting looked good.

In post 1074, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 1071, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 3, do you think Lady 4 is town?

I remember townreading her but I don't remember why. I think part of it was a lot of going against the grain.

Do you town read her after review?

In post 1075, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 985, Gentleman 4 wrote:I... this might be a question that just goes unanswered, but if you have a response, I'd love to hear it; what about Gentleman 3's early posting seemed honest to you?

Speaking of G4, I dont think I answered this as I went to bed.

I cant give you specifics but I thought like L9, G3 stayed pretty active and i thought the posting looked good.

I appreciate your response, thanks.

I want to ask you something further, Gentleman 5, but I can't put my finger on what it is. If you manage to think of it, I'd be very grateful.

Gentleman 3, is there a reason you haven't proposed yet? Who are you thinking of proposing to, if anyone?

In post 1076, Gentleman 4 wrote:Do you town read her after review?

That's too much effort...

Gimme a minute to look and I'll let you know.

I’ll laugh if g4 and l8 are scum together and g4 manipulated g6 away from town and to his partner.

Yeah I still think she's > rand town. That's in large part due to 177.

In post 1081, Gentleman 3 wrote:Yeah I still think she's > rand town. That's in large part due to 177.

The interesting thing about that post is that I don't know that a lot of players were particularly townreading Lady 7 at that point, this post just looks to show that she's trying to be counter flow and it feels awkward.

Disagree with me or not, I do appreciate the effort. Who are you looking to match with?

In post 1078, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 3, is there a reason you haven't proposed yet?

- because I don't like making decisions
- because I think pairs should be widely agreed on
- because I want to pair with someone who wants to pair with me, and only L5 has expressed interest, and I have thought about asking her but have not yet come to a conclusion

Who are you thinking of proposing to, if anyone?

Depends on how people read me, which I really don't have that clear of a picture on. If people feel good about me I'd want one of my townreads (probably L5 or L7); if I'm going to be mislynched anyway, I would not want to drag them down and would instead try to pair with scum/lynchbait.

In post 1080, Lady 7 wrote:I’ll laugh if g4 and l8 are scum together and g4 manipulated g6 away from town and to his partner.

Why would that be funny?

I think this is a very strange way to say you think I'm scum, and I'd prefer it if you didn't try to poke and prod at it instead of confronting it directly.

I’m interested g3

In post 1082, Gentleman 4 wrote:The interesting thing about that post is that I don't know that a lot of players were particularly townreading Lady 7 at that point

Explicitly it was only me and L9, though we were both very present in the early pages. Several other people had at least indicated that they didn't scumread her. I think it's reasonable to think of it as consensus.

In post 1006, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.

Lady 8, will you dance with me?

The degree to which my head is in the same space as yours this game is remarkable.

Lady 7 wrote:I’ll laugh if g4 and l8 are scum together and g4 manipulated g6 away from town and to his partner.

(I dont endorse this or anything, just thought it was funny)

Gentleman 4 wrote:I want to ask you something further, Gentleman 5, but I can't put my finger on what it is. If you manage to think of it, I'd be very grateful.?

I dont want two out anything at this time, sorry.

In post 1085, Lady 7 wrote:I’m interested g3

If we hypothetically pair and are T/T (and don't die at intermission), do you think the odds are good that we can survive till endgame?

If not, I'd want you to pair with someone with whom you can survive till endgame.

In post 1084, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 1080, Lady 7 wrote:I’ll laugh if g4 and l8 are scum together and g4 manipulated g6 away from town and to his partner.

Why would that be funny?

I think this is a very strange way to say you think I'm scum, and I'd prefer it if you didn't try to poke and prod at it instead of confronting it directly.

I don’t even know if I think you’re scum. It’s just that some of the ways you’ve come into the thread have felt slithery and manipulative, like the way you dealt with g6 last night, and I don’t know what to make if it, but you feel like a devil in a suit with some brandy smoking a cigar pulling people into your den. Are you on the up and up or crafting dastardly plans?

It would be amusing because it was so smooth and well played if that were the case.

In post 1086, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 1082, Gentleman 4 wrote:The interesting thing about that post is that I don't know that a lot of players were particularly townreading Lady 7 at that point

Explicitly it was only me and L9, though we were both very present in the early pages. Several other people had at least indicated that they didn't scumread her. I think it's reasonable to think of it as consensus.

Fair enough. I thought I remembered Gentleman 6 also scumreading them at that point, but I re-examined and he actually pointed fingers at Lady 4 for scumreading Lady 7 at that point.

You know, for 44 pages in, there seems to be alot of uncertainty for reads.

I mean, theres a reason/excuse I, G2, and maybe one or two other have, but the rest of yall idk what to think.

@Gentleman 5: Of the items you spoke of earlier, I think I understand both of them. On your current topic, I'd like to say that I think my reads are relatively solid, and I strongly encourage a reread if you feel your own are not in a similar position.

In post 1089, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 1084, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 1080, Lady 7 wrote:I’ll laugh if g4 and l8 are scum together and g4 manipulated g6 away from town and to his partner.

Why would that be funny?

I think this is a very strange way to say you think I'm scum, and I'd prefer it if you didn't try to poke and prod at it instead of confronting it directly.

I don’t even know if I think you’re scum. It’s just that some of the ways you’ve come into the thread have felt slithery and manipulative, like the way you dealt with g6 last night, and I don’t know what to make if it, but you feel like a devil in a suit with some brandy smoking a cigar pulling people into your den. Are you on the up and up or crafting dastardly plans?

It would be amusing because it was so smooth and well played if that were the case.

The imagery is flattering to say the least. I can follow where you're coming from, but I have to admit I'm at least slightly frustrated because I was explicitly trying to avoid such an occurrence.

In post 1091, Gentleman 5 wrote:You know, for 44 pages in, there seems to be alot of uncertainty for reads.

I mean, theres a reason/excuse I, G2, and maybe one or two other have, but the rest of yall idk what to think.

I have an excuse too, it's that I secretly suck at mafia. Don't tell anyone.

L7, if you're town who is scared that I'm being redirected to scum there's an obvious solution to the situation.

In post 1088, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 1085, Lady 7 wrote:I’m interested g3

If we hypothetically pair and are T/T (and don't die at intermission), do you think the odds are good that we can survive till endgame?

If not, I'd want you to pair with someone with whom you can survive till endgame.

Can we? Maybe? I don’t know. I haven’t thought that far ahead because I’ve mostly been at wanting to pair with someone I think has a decent chance of being town I think I can get along with. It’s been a long tine, I just wanted to get my feet wet in a game, and I haven’t thought strategy so I dunno.

In post 1091, Gentleman 5 wrote:You know, for 44 pages in, there seems to be alot of uncertainty for reads.

I mean, theres a reason/excuse I, G2, and maybe one or two other have, but the rest of yall idk what to think.

I doubt therefore I am.

In post 1092, Gentleman 4 wrote:The imagery is flattering to say the least. I can follow where you're coming from, but I have to admit I'm at least slightly frustrated because I was explicitly trying to avoid such an occurrence.

I don’t mean to frustrate, sorry!

In post 1096, Lady 7 wrote:I doubt therefore I am.

Well, maybe...

In post 1094, Gentleman 6 wrote:L7, if you're town who is scared that I'm being redirected to scum there's an obvious solution to the situation.

I mean maybe I’m silly.

You’ve been clear since the beginning of the game you wanted 9 or 8. With 9 unavailable 8 is the one you wanted to pair with before you started trying to figure out who would be best according to everyone else. I just think you should do what you want.