Page 44 of 50
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:18 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1074, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1072, Ph0enix wrote:
Because we've known the setup for most of the game, and me joining even later on D1 makes it an even bigger percentage of the whole experience in comparison to most of the other players that participate(d).
I don't buy it.
I couldn't care less if you buy it or not, tbh.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:18 am
by Datisi
Yeah, that actually made me chuckle.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:18 am
by NorwegianboyEE
You should, it's connected to your wincon.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:19 am
by Ph0enix
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:19 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:21 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
What dirt? So far it's been you throwing arguments, me defending myself, and you continuing to the next when you see an argument is full of shit in the first place.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:21 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Because if the scum team consists of a mafia goon/mafia goon setup which i heavily suspect to be the case, it is 1/3 likely that the town PR's are masons. And scum!you would be on the lookout for it.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:22 am
by Datisi
I'll say that I've made up my mind some 75% already. However, I have a bad experience voting quickly in lylo, so I'm gonna reread the game later.
You two can stop screaming at each other if you want, I'll ping yall if I need anything.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:22 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:23 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 1080, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
What dirt? So far it's been you throwing arguments, me defending myself, and you continuing to the next when you see an argument is full of shit in the first place.
Well no, most of your defenses are mediocre and doesn't decidedly prove that i'm wrong. Merely you pointing out: "oh but in a theoretical world i could be town here!" doesn't completely invalidate what i say.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:24 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1081, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Because if the scum team consists of a mafia goon/mafia goon setup which i heavily suspect to be the case, it is 1/3 likely that the town PR's are masons. And scum!you would be on the lookout for it.
So?
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:25 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 1083, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
You keep your nose clean. So it's hard to pinpoint exactly what you've done that can be considered 100% scum indicative. That's why i keep digging in your ISO because i'm trying to win. Also my confidence is a tactic, not necessarily the truth.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:25 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1084, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1080, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
What dirt? So far it's been you throwing arguments, me defending myself, and you continuing to the next when you see an argument is full of shit in the first place.
Well no, most of your defenses are mediocre and doesn't decidedly prove that i'm wrong.
Merely you pointing out: "oh but in a theoretical world i could be town here!"
doesn't completely invalidate what i say.
What?
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:27 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1086, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1083, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
You keep your nose clean. So it's hard to pinpoint exactly what you've done that can be considered 100% scum indicative. That's why i keep digging in your ISO because i'm trying to win. Also my confidence is a tactic, not necessarily the truth.
Hm, still can't help but see a change of tone over the course of the day.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:27 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Anyway apparently Datisi has made up his mind so there's no point wasting anymore time. I still think you scum-slipped with your comment about why scum would target Kanna earlier.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:30 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1089, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Anyway apparently Datisi has made up his mind so there's no point wasting anymore time. I still think you scum-slipped with your comment about why scum would target Kanna earlier.
So be it.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:41 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1086, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1083, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
You keep your nose clean. So it's hard to pinpoint exactly what you've done that can be considered 100% scum indicative. That's why i keep digging in your ISO because i'm trying to win. Also my confidence is a tactic, not necessarily the truth.
You're still contradicting yourself given early-D4-Norway as opposed to your attitude now. First, I'm definitely scum and Datisi has to only reread the game to understand that, and now you have to "dig up dirt" in order to prove your point. Tactic, you say? I'm not sure it's working out as intended.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:51 am
by Ph0enix
@Datisi: If you have any concerns about me, I'll be more than happy to address them as I'm not too confident who you're going to pick.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:53 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 1091, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1086, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1083, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
You keep your nose clean. So it's hard to pinpoint exactly what you've done that can be considered 100% scum indicative. That's why i keep digging in your ISO because i'm trying to win. Also my confidence is a tactic, not necessarily the truth.
You're still contradicting yourself given early-D4-Norway as opposed to your attitude now. First, I'm definitely scum and Datisi has to only reread the game to understand that, and now you have to "dig up dirt" in order to prove your point. Tactic, you say? I'm not sure it's working out as intended.
It's not a contradiction as it is a change of heart. And why is that scummy exactly.
Anyway i've seen enough out of you. And i thought you felt the discussion was over.
Are you perhaps nervous about losing since you're restarting the discussion?
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:55 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1093, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1091, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1086, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 1083, Ph0enix wrote: In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Datisi is that enough for you? Do i need to keep digging up all the dirt i can find on this guy?
If you were so sure Datisi wouldn't vote you upon rereading as you said in the beginning of D4, you wouldn't have had to dig up dirt in the first place. You're not so sure anymore who Datisi's going to vote.
You keep your nose clean. So it's hard to pinpoint exactly what you've done that can be considered 100% scum indicative. That's why i keep digging in your ISO because i'm trying to win. Also my confidence is a tactic, not necessarily the truth.
You're still contradicting yourself given early-D4-Norway as opposed to your attitude now. First, I'm definitely scum and Datisi has to only reread the game to understand that, and now you have to "dig up dirt" in order to prove your point. Tactic, you say? I'm not sure it's working out as intended.
It's not a contradiction as it is a change of heart. And why is that scummy exactly.
Anyway i've seen enough out of you. And i thought you felt the discussion was over.
Are you perhaps nervous about losing since you're restarting the discussion?
I'm just saying your confidence is a facade that isn't working in your favor.
The discussion hasn't stopped in order for me to restart it. With "so be it" I was referring to you thinking I scum-flipped.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:00 am
by Datisi
Don't worry, I'll ask if I need anything. It's probably gonna be a couple of hours though, since I kinda sorta don't feel like rereading right now lol.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:02 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I meant scum-slipped. But you're right. That's exactly what i'm thinking. You're going to scumflip.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:03 am
by Datisi
I'm having fun watching you two yell at eachother. But then I remember I have to actually make the choice. Sigh.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:04 am
by Ph0enix
In post 1096, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
I meant scum-slipped. But you're right. That's exactly what i'm thinking. You're going to scumflip.
* scum-slipped
My bad.
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:05 am
by NorwegianboyEE
*Freudian slip