Mafiascum.net

In post 1073, pisskop wrote:we arent my mylo, but we shouldnt accept 'some role flavorer did it' without demanding further explanation. It screams fake, whether from eyestott or from our masked-man joat.

I'm ok with this part. I want another conftown.

Im starting to think youre scum angling at me titus

In post 1076, pisskop wrote:Im starting to think youre scum angling at me titus

Ok. Think what you want.

If you're innocent, the joat never comes forward, thus no conftown. So how is this an angle?

Yeah I would lynch pisskop probably without a massclaim, but I think massclaim is necessary

In post 1078, gobbledygook wrote:Yeah I would lynch pisskop probably without a massclaim, but I think massclaim is necessary

I would rather keep the other mason hidden. We need the joat to claim. Then tmo we can talk about mass claim. If the other mason dies, I'll be on board with massclaim.

No the other mason exists to trump card when it comes.

In post 1077, Titus wrote:

In post 1076, pisskop wrote:Im starting to think youre scum angling at me titus

Ok. Think what you want.

If you're innocent, the joat never comes forward, thus no conftown. So how is this an angle?

Its not enough that a joat claims, or claims to have sent it. They need to fully claim, and explain why they didnt out yesterday, and wasted their mailman ability.

I dont think youre scum for just today, titus. I think youve been playing the ol' pisskop tunnel, and now it might be omgus but Im thinking its to screen your own play.

In post 1080, pisskop wrote:Its not enough that a joat claims, or claims to have sent it. They need to fully claim, and explain why they didnt out yesterday, and wasted their mailman ability.

Why are you even supposing this joat exists?

In post 1080, pisskop wrote:No the other mason exists to trump card when it comes.

In post 1077, Titus wrote:

In post 1076, pisskop wrote:Im starting to think youre scum angling at me titus

Ok. Think what you want.

If you're innocent, the joat never comes forward, thus no conftown. So how is this an angle?

Its not enough that a joat claims, or claims to have sent it. They need to fully claim, and explain why they didnt out yesterday, and wasted their mailman ability.

I dont think youre scum for just today, titus. I think youve been playing the ol' pisskop tunnel, and now it might be omgus but Im thinking its to screen your own play.

What would you have liked the mailman to do?

In post 1081, Titus wrote:

In post 1080, pisskop wrote:Its not enough that a joat claims, or claims to have sent it. They need to fully claim, and explain why they didnt out yesterday, and wasted their mailman ability.

Why are you even supposing this joat exists?

???

because it might? Im not discounting the possibility that eyestott got a mailman but the mailer is a liar who can get roped.

For instance: why did they send it to eyestott over the myriad of other players, some who can drive a lynch much harder than eye? Probs to try to force a quicklynch today.

Churros, you need to confirm how your ability works in connection with NAR

pedit: send it to eyestott because eyestott would be alive

In post 1083, pisskop wrote:

In post 1081, Titus wrote:

In post 1080, pisskop wrote:Its not enough that a joat claims, or claims to have sent it. They need to fully claim, and explain why they didnt out yesterday, and wasted their mailman ability.

Why are you even supposing this joat exists?

???

because it might? Im not discounting the possibility that eyestott got a mailman but the mailer is a liar who can get roped.

They'd just shut up instead.

I find it odd you're wanting a full claim X shot tracker my ass.

In post 1085, gobbledygook wrote:Churros, you need to confirm how your ability works in connection with NAR

pedit: send it to eyestott because eyestott would be alive

And not voting Pisskop already

I think that a real mailer with a hard guilty would have not let yesterday happen.

It is like so incredibly obvious who the mailer is and this is exactly the type of play they do lol

I recite my previous post in response.

In post 1089, gobbledygook wrote:It is like so incredibly obvious who the mailer is and this is exactly the type of play they do lol

Then who is it?

Titus, i'm not voting anyone until mailman claims. Churros checks with mod. And we have more people weigh in.

pedit:
I'm not going to reveal that

Ok. Then we'll wait on the mailman.

Sorry I stayed up all night and thought about checking the game before going to sleep but what do you want exactly from me?

I'm not at my best state

NAR you mean night action resolution?

The treestumped person can't be affected by any night abilities, if I was to treestump the nightkill I suppose it would also block the kill itself maybe, although I'm not sure of the later part.

They can post though, not sure why Egix didn't say anything yet. I saw him post elsewhere/online

I slightly feel like I can have messed up by doing this but I don't think I did. probably.

Titus being my first SR historically means I'm more likely than not right on her because my reads progressively get worse most of the time, but at the same time I'm off put on my reads being roughly wrong in the past two days.

I probably need a soft reset here

ok cool alimdia

why would a scum mailman try to frame pisskop of all people when he was probably going to be the lynch anyway today?