Mafiascum.net

coalition

PookyTheMagicalBear [5]:

Deimos27, SleeperSoul, DonCorleone, PookyTheMagicalBear, Klick

Alduskkel [5]:

Alduskkel, Klick, SleeperSoul, DkKoba, Deimos27

SleeperSoul [5]:

SleeperSoul, Deimos27, Klick, DKoba, PookyTheMagicalBear

DkKoba [5]:

DkKoba, PookyTheMagicalBear, Klick, SleeperSoul, Clover Ebi

Deimos27 [4]:

Deimos27, Klick, Wug, SleeperSoul

Klick [4]:

Klick, SleeperSoul, Clover Ebi, DonCorleone

Wug [3]:

Wug, Deimos27, Klick

DonCorleone [0]:

Clover Ebi [0]:

lynch

Wug (2):

DonCorleone, DkKoba

SleeperSoul (1):

Deimos27

PookyTheMagicalBear (1):

Alduskkel

not voting (5):

Klick, Clover Ebi, SleeperSoul, PookyTheMagicalBear, Wug

flavour

mod notes

• thank you! please enjoy this lovely image.
  
• Play nice.

In post 1075, Datisi wrote:mine?

Courtesy of Deimos

But yeah TL;DR I'm coming around to Aldus/Wug I think that team actually does have a fair bit of explanatory power.

guess whos drunk

I saw klick posting elsewhere on site but nothing here i am curious as to why ):

I'm taking this game seriously enough that I'd rather post in here when I've got the motivation to contribute significantly. And I'm pretty happy with the current state of things.
Going to sleep imminently but if you want to talk I'll be around a bit tomorrow!

In post 1061, DkKoba wrote:also if this coalition is wrong im voting wug amyways for 3 clears lmao

idgi

u are mafia

In post 1061, DkKoba wrote:for 3 clears lmao

this is the part i don't get

its simple if u get mafia outside coalition on d1 u get 3 clears

There's no way to know how many mafia members are in the coalition, though, so I can see why wug doesn't get it.

Oh sorry i was speaking with the assumption that wug is scum which she is

not really but ok

thought 3 clears was about my 3 heals

u subbed into a scum slot lmao

In post 1044, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1038, DkKoba wrote:also pooky if you're willing to read me in good faith and discuss things I will talk but I'm going to continue to ignore anything you say about me and not respond to it until you agree to have a conversation and not just a conf bias 1 way dialogue

I'm not going to trust you until I figure out who the rat on the original coalition is

In post 1072, Deimos27 wrote:This tl of Aldus was nonsense and I think this lack of resonance can also be explained by scum agenda when you think of these two as the scumteam. Considering the gamestate of neither of them being included in the townblock, Tux was trying to legitimize his teammate and perpetuate the idea that Aldus should be townread.

So why did I call attention to Tux's townread on me being bad?

In post 1066, Deimos27 wrote:I wish DC would play the game

Sorry, I just haven’t really been feeling it, not sure why

I think partly because it’s been very spammy and that’s just demotivating. Idk if it’s scum playing for a win in the most boring way possible but it’s hard to motivate to do what is already a 40 page reread to try and get solid TRs when I know a lot of it is just air but it’s still air that I’ll have to read

In post 965, Alduskkel wrote:How so?

You look like you have very little interest in solving the game

@klick, you’ve mentioned a couple of times you’re townreading me, and that’s despite my absence the last like 3 days or so — what is it you were seeing in my early play that made me town enough for you to still be wanting me in your coalition?

take a shot for every prod in the game

HEAL: sleeper

deimos should pick one of pooky/koba and maybe sleeper should too

actually i still like ald

HEAL: ald

In post 1092, DonCorleone wrote:

In post 1066, Deimos27 wrote:I wish DC would play the game

Sorry, I just haven’t really been feeling it, not sure why

I think partly because it’s been very spammy and that’s just demotivating. Idk if it’s scum playing for a win in the most boring way possible but it’s hard to motivate to do what is already a 40 page reread to try and get solid TRs when I know a lot of it is just air but it’s still air that I’ll have to read

Sorry for contributing to you feeling demotivated. I know I make a lot of posts but I feel that most of them have at least one thought that is significant and worth a point on their own. Replacing in leads to me having a number of separate thoughts, and the two methods of posting those thoughts are quote-walling and multi-posting. I find that quote-walling gets me ignored more.

In post 1094, DonCorleone wrote:@klick, you’ve mentioned a couple of times you’re townreading me, and that’s despite my absence the last like 3 days or so — what is it you were seeing in my early play that made me town enough for you to still be wanting me in your coalition?

So first, I think it's important to realise that your (and Clover's - relevant) inactivity hasn't been a reason to not have you in a coalition for me. There are enough low-activity players in this game that we're likely to need at least one in the final coalition if we want it to be all-town. Do remember that you have 110 posts to read you from, despite being inactive lately.

Your spam posting on Page 9/10 was really good. Your first reads post is excellent and lined up pretty strongly with where I was then (and where I am now!). You posted rather stream-of-consciousness after that in a way that looked legit. Later your 345 read as legit as well - I see little motivation as scum for doubting Sleeper there, compared to you just... solving, if you're town. Your whole vibe feels like genuine solving.