Mafiascum.net

Vote Count 3.0

Not Voting(9)Dunnstral,superbowl9,osuka,Gypyx,

WaltertheDunce10

,Nepenthes,Titus,chkflip,Looker,

Looker(0)

osuka(0)

Titus

0verki11

(0)

Dunnstral(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Gypyx(0)

superbowl9(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 9 alive it is 5 to execute, and 5 to No Execute.

Day 3 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-14 05:39:00) or when an execution has been achieved.

VOTE: Gypyx

Good morning.

No not tw

I’ll miss him

VOTE: looker

That's why the rest of the folks shouldn't randomly reveal as ic

also truth was scum, and was heavily playing into his persona from last game.

Looker, are you a power role or what? It sounded like you were planning to claim today

In post 1076, Titus wrote:VOTE: Gypyx

Good morning.

In post 1077, osuka wrote:No not tw

I’ll miss him

VOTE: looker

None of this naked shit, it's D3. Elaborate.

In post 1080, chkflip wrote:

In post 1076, Titus wrote:VOTE: Gypyx

Good morning.

In post 1077, osuka wrote:No not tw

I’ll miss him

VOTE: looker

None of this naked shit, it's D3. Elaborate.

literally just fucking iso me. my reasons for voting looker haven't changed from day 2

In post 951, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 947, Looker wrote:Also. Gypyx said that he hated policy elims and that the ICs were voting me. They weren't. Superbowl and osuka were voting me. The ICs were voting Truth.

But a good point, gypyx were you reading

Acknowledgement of this would be nice.

In post 981, superbowl9 wrote:I literally just can't at this point. I'm about to post a copypasta level rant

940 just continues the misreps, it's too much of a headache at this point to even address. I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall in this looker interaction.

Of course the terrible hammer is policy elimable. Looker has just been playing SO poorly for the past little while, yet SOMEHOW we keep finding reasons other than townreads to justify prolonging their stay. If there's one type of person I don't want to have around in a MYLO, it's someone who's willing to lolhammer to save their own bacon. I know people with lots of experience like to get real cute and spin themselves into logical circles sometimes, but there comes a time when you have to take ur head out of ur pooper and actually just play the game.

I'd like you to further explain this and why you thought AtE was a good choice.

In post 1006, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:IDK
One of looker osukua, chk is scum though at a min to me

Still fine with truth
I wonder if top wagons are both scum and are being bussed
Seems unlikely though.
pedit my GOD }

Today should be the day that you vote osuka.

In post 1027, Nepenthes wrote:Osuka is probably scum
Ill miss tw

Agreed, especially after that heavy defense of Truth.

• Osuka pretended like he didn't know it was D2 to throw us off his cognizance of night actions.
  
• Osuka's "case" against me was that I'm "more skilled" and therefore "dangerous". There was also another post about "cold takes" that he didn't follow-up on after I responded.
  
• All of osuka's votes on my have been naked. He says he's been calling me scum "this whole time", but never with justification.
  
• What "doesn't sit right" with chkflip? I don't understand what he's not 'letting me off the hook' for.
  
• Was there a specific post where I claimed intent to claim? Dunnstral insists I was about to claim.

VOTE: osuka Basic math/odds and your heavy defense of Truth. Also the fact that you're avoiding superbowl.

VOTE: Osuka
I agree

In post 951, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 947, Looker wrote:Also. Gypyx said that he hated policy elims and that the ICs were voting me. They weren't. Superbowl and osuka were voting me. The ICs were voting Truth.

But a good point, gypyx were you reading

I did read just that i misread the VC

Anyways, my scumhunting is terrible, so to put that here, i'll just focus on finding other town to sheep if y'all don't mind, or i can try to scumhunt and just assume that i'm wrong

Also just a quick point, why did looker hammer truth even if he wanted to flip him the least out of all players, survivalism?

In post 597, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 1.END

bugspray(7)Dunnstral,Truth,Looker,Gypyx,

WaltertheDunce10

,superbowl9,chkflip,

Not Voting(4)

LicketyQuickety

,0verki11,

Psyche,

osuka,

Psyche

(1)redtea,

Truth(1)bugspray,

Gypyx(0)

osuka(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)


I am posting this to look at in one place.

LicketyQuickety

(0)

superbowl9(0)

Dunnstral(0)

Looker(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

redtea(0)

0verki11(0)

No Execute (0)

With 13 alive it is 7 to execute, and 7 to No Execute.

Day 1 ends.

bugspray

has been executed. They were:

Spoiler:

Town Ninja Roleblocker

You are a Town Ninja Roleblocker.

Your actions are not visible to Tracker-like and Watcher-like roles

Each night, you may target a player. Assuming no interference with your action, that player's active abilities will be blocked that night.

You win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one town-aligned player is alive.

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 1 begins. Lickety Quickety is being replaced.
Night 1 will end in (expired on 2020-07-30 03:30:00) if a replacement for Lickety Quickety is found within 24 hours.

In post 1074, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 2.6

Truth(6)

WaltertheDunce10

,Nepenthes,

the worst

,Titus,chkflip,Looker,

Looker(3)superbowl9,osuka,Gypyx,

Not Voting(1)Dunnstral,

osuka(1)Truth,

Titus

0verki11

(0)

Dunnstral(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Gypyx(0)

the worst

LicketyQuickety

(0)

superbowl9(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 11 alive it is 6 to execute, and 6 to No Execute.

Day 2 ends.

Truth

was executed Day 2. They were:

Spoiler:

Mafia Goon

You are a Mafia Goon.

[REDACTED]

Each night, if no other member of your faction is performing this action, you may target a player. Assuming no interference with your action, that player will die.

You win if at least one mafia member is alive and all other players are dead (or if nothing can prevent the same).

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 2 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-07 03:34:00)

.

In post 1084, Gypyx wrote:

In post 951, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 947, Looker wrote:Also. Gypyx said that he hated policy elims and that the ICs were voting me. They weren't. Superbowl and osuka were voting me. The ICs were voting Truth.

But a good point, gypyx were you reading

I did read just that i misread the VC

Anyways, my scumhunting is terrible, so to put that here, i'll just focus on finding other town to sheep if y'all don't mind, or i can try to scumhunt and just assume that i'm wrong

Also just a quick point, why did looker hammer truth even if he wanted to flip him the least out of all players, survivalism?

Do you townhunt

Chk Dunn where are you two at today
Im unchanged from yesterday

Osukas dislike of truths play and acknowledgement they were a distraction regardless of their alignment is at odds with his total disinterest in elimming truth yesterday

Also see what happens when you say a players unreadable and then dont kill them
Except you wont see because we did kill them

In post 1076, Titus wrote:VOTE: Gypyx

Good morning.

VOTE: osuka
Good morning Titus im thinking youre next

In post 935, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 888, osuka wrote:overly defensive about the paranoia bullshit which, frankly, comes more often from town than it does from scum (because scum don't have to worry about being pocketed at all and manipulated nearly as much as town), and the fact that he hasn't pointed that out yet is frankly puzzling

Are you saying its puzzling that looker hasnt pointed out themself that their own paranoia should be a towntell

@osuka did you reply to this

In post 1079, Dunnstral wrote:also truth was scum, and was heavily playing into his persona from last game.

Looker, are you a power role or what? It sounded like you were planning to claim today

In post 731, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think Truth is scum though

He's just.. loopy

? What are you saying in 1079

In post 940, Looker wrote:Sorry, Truth, but I need another day

This made me think you were a PR

In post 1090, Nepenthes wrote:? What are you saying in 1079

It's not related to 731

He was playing into his persona from last game by claiming vt and acting like he didn't know what he was doing

In post 1082, Looker wrote:

In post 951, Nepenthes wrote:

In post 947, Looker wrote:Also. Gypyx said that he hated policy elims and that the ICs were voting me. They weren't. Superbowl and osuka were voting me. The ICs were voting Truth.

But a good point, gypyx were you reading

Acknowledgement of this would be nice.

In post 981, superbowl9 wrote:I literally just can't at this point. I'm about to post a copypasta level rant

940 just continues the misreps, it's too much of a headache at this point to even address. I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall in this looker interaction.

Of course the terrible hammer is policy elimable. Looker has just been playing SO poorly for the past little while, yet SOMEHOW we keep finding reasons other than townreads to justify prolonging their stay. If there's one type of person I don't want to have around in a MYLO, it's someone who's willing to lolhammer to save their own bacon. I know people with lots of experience like to get real cute and spin themselves into logical circles sometimes, but there comes a time when you have to take ur head out of ur pooper and actually just play the game.

I'd like you to further explain this and why you thought AtE was a good choice.

In post 1006, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:IDK
One of looker osukua, chk is scum though at a min to me

Still fine with truth
I wonder if top wagons are both scum and are being bussed
Seems unlikely though.
pedit my GOD }

Today should be the day that you vote osuka.

In post 1027, Nepenthes wrote:Osuka is probably scum
Ill miss tw

Agreed, especially after that heavy defense of Truth.

---

• Osuka pretended like he didn't know it was D2 to throw us off his cognizance of night actions.
  
• Osuka's "case" against me was that I'm "more skilled" and therefore "dangerous". There was also another post about "cold takes" that he didn't follow-up on after I responded.
  
• All of osuka's votes on my have been naked. He says he's been calling me scum "this whole time", but never with justification.
  
• What "doesn't sit right" with chkflip? I don't understand what he's not 'letting me off the hook' for.
  
• Was there a specific post where I claimed intent to claim? Dunnstral insists I was about to claim.

VOTE: osuka Basic math/odds and your heavy defense of Truth. Also the fact that you're avoiding superbowl.

this is the same shit tier attempt at a case you've been trying to do on me for basically a whole game day now. Kinda sad really

let's go point by point:
- I actually did not realize it was d2, but suppose i did that on purpose: what the fuck does that accomplish, then? what do i gain with that?
- my case on you does, in fact, go far beyond the post you're referring to. nice misrep though
- this is about chkflip
- this is about dunnstral

so basically, literally half of your latest case on me is actually not on me at all, which is exactly what you did here, while the other half is shitty pseudo-analysis that isn't even accurate (which you also did in that post).

additionally: please point out exactly where i tried to "heavily defend" truth. i'd love to see you try

In post 1084, Gypyx wrote:Also just a quick point, why did looker hammer truth even if he wanted to flip him the least out of all players, survivalism?

survivalism? sad bus attempt in light of an impending scum flip? you name it

In post 1087, Nepenthes wrote:Osukas dislike of truths play and acknowledgement they were a distraction regardless of their alignment is at odds with his total disinterest in elimming truth yesterday

Also see what happens when you say a players unreadable and then dont kill them
Except you wont see because we did kill them

and this is a sad misrep as well. i'd like to extend my prompt to looker to you as well - please point out where i'm totally disinterested in exec'ing truth yesterday

i don't have particularly high hopes for that one since you've shown yourself completely incapable of original thought so far

In post 1092, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1090, Nepenthes wrote:? What are you saying in 1079

It's not related to 731

He was playing into his persona from last game by claiming vt and acting like he didn't know what he was doing

at this point i dont even think this is a persona at all, i think he's just really really clueless

Busy weekend again so will be less active than I'd like once again

Looks like a truth policy elim was the right idea - your turn looker

In post 1082, Looker wrote:I'd like you to further explain this and why you thought AtE was a good choice.

AtE??? How much can you actually misrepresent stuff? When you just were twisting little things it was annoying, but when you twist every single thing against you into something it's not it really does harm helpful discussion - the topic has now been moved from what I said to whether what I said was AtE, which it clearly was not (theres a difference between letting emotion influence a post and making emotion the point of your post).

I think that my posts and general direction have been pretty clear for the past little bit, which is that this type of bs:

In post 1082, Looker wrote:Basic math/odds and your heavy defense of Truth. Also the fact that you're avoiding superbowl.

Saying that out of 4 players there's a 25% chance one is scum, so let's elim them all is not scumhunting. Noting basic level aspects which even first game scum would attempt to control such as which players have interacted is also not scumhunting. These are just excuses to vote whoever you would like to vote disguised as scumhunting.

VOTE: looker

In post 1094, osuka wrote:

In post 1084, Gypyx wrote:Also just a quick point, why did looker hammer truth even if he wanted to flip him the least out of all players, survivalism?

survivalism? sad bus attempt in light of an impending scum flip? you name it

I was more asking to looker himself but thanks

Also, i'm making a guess here, does truth insisting to get a claim from Nash (now chkflip) is a poor attempt from him to distanciate from his scummates?

Cuz like, as well as that i find chk's vote on truth to be weird, as there isn't any reason he mentions why he's voting him, and he even proceeds to push harder on looker, while voting truth, which seems a little contradictory to me