Mafiascum.net

In post 1070, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1064, Brian Skies wrote:Like, what benefit does town get in knowing who each person is supposed to target each night?

The main benefit is that if there is an important power role who is a blade but hasn't claimed, they won't have to claim to have a chance to be targetted.

Because as I said, drivers are overwhelmingly likely to target people who have already claimed as blades. Unless we think drivers are more willing to target unclaimed targets?

Drivers don't have to visit anyone at all if they don't want to.

If a driver wants to visit, they should visit a townread of theirs and pray they didn't visit scum.

Grouping players off potentially forces drivers into visiting scum blades, giving the scumteam info on who those particular drivers are that they wouldn't otherwise have gotten.

In post 1066, Cabd wrote:I feel like most slots have posted alignment indicative content and given the play size and base, capping day one under 60 pages is a-fucking-okay.

I wholeheartedly believe this and will fight for it

I think scum would rather to be given more wriggle room and locking them into a decision when we have the numbers advantage benefits us

In post 1075, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 1070, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1064, Brian Skies wrote:Like, what benefit does town get in knowing who each person is supposed to target each night?

The main benefit is that if there is an important power role who is a blade but hasn't claimed, they won't have to claim to have a chance to be targetted.

Because as I said, drivers are overwhelmingly likely to target people who have already claimed as blades. Unless we think drivers are more willing to target unclaimed targets?

Drivers don't have to visit anyone at all if they don't want to.

If a driver wants to visit, they should visit a townread of theirs and pray they didn't visit scum.

Grouping players off potentially forces drivers into visiting scum blades, giving the scumteam info on who those particular drivers are that they wouldn't otherwise have gotten.

Yeah I am coming around to this POV. Night one FFA, lolhammers ahoy.

In post 1071, unwnd wrote:

In post 1070, Dunnstral wrote:Unless we think drivers are more willing to target unclaimed targets?

I see nothing that states Drivers give a negative benefit to (not) picking a blade, therefore I think just going with a townread is a perfectly fine strategy and will create some rapport between Driver/Blade anyway if they accept

Bumping this to newpage, because ego

In post 1066, Cabd wrote:I feel like most slots have posted alignment indicative content and given the play size and base, capping day one under 60 pages is a-fucking-okay.

Before I go: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

i am joking dont read into my claim

Don't worry about my role because I'm getting shot night one once cakes flips mafia, lmfao.

I don't need to find anyone to shitpost with.

In post 1081, Cabd wrote:Don't worry about my role because I'm getting shot night one once cakes flips mafia, lmfao.

I don't need to find anyone to shitpost with.

unfortunate

shitposting is my only skill

In post 1082, L4pe wrote:shitposting is my only skill

i vibe with this

In post 964, Firebringer wrote:leaf i dont think u usually hold much stock in my reads, but i am pretty sure cakez is town.
I hope u take this into consideration.

ty for ur time.

can you talk about why you're sure he's town?

In post 1084, Fermis Flames wrote:can you talk about why you're sure he's town?

womens intuition

Woah Cakez wagon got big. Reading up

In post 1085, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1084, Fermis Flames wrote:can you talk about why you're sure he's town?

womens intuition

But can you elaborate some?

You complained my other heads weren't talking to you and when I try you're not helpful!

In post 1087, Fermis Flames wrote:

In post 1085, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1084, Fermis Flames wrote:can you talk about why you're sure he's town?

womens intuition

But can you elaborate some?

You complained my other heads weren't talking to you and when I try you're not helpful!

i dont get the agenda feel from him.

In post 1035, Cabd wrote:

In post 1034, Cabd wrote:breakfast for dinner

Which is explicitly different than Breakfast with Stalin.

Ha!

~ strange

Firebringer your read is really weak

In post 815, Bell wrote:VOTE: fermis flames

Sorta was thinking this too. At least I didn’t get the high tier TR from Cab on them

You don't need to have an agenda to be scum

I wanted pools to allow some sort of tracking down the line if there was tomfoolery in the night actions. We can do free for all though.

My concept was essentially- Players pick a pool of 4. Person above them in the OP vetoes one. Person below vetoes one. Players then target between the two.

Ninja-
I too am not opposed to looking at the hot hydra.

In post 1090, Dunnstral wrote:Firebringer your read is really weak

I am very confident in it tho

In post 1092, Dunnstral wrote:You don't need to have an agenda to be scum

but cakez almost always has that feel to him as scum!

In post 1091, midwaybear wrote:

In post 815, Bell wrote:VOTE: fermis flames

Sorta was thinking this too. At least I didn’t get the high tier TR from Cab on them

Now that you've brought attention to this: I'm also willing to vote for this person.

VOTE: Fermis Flames

In post 1093, Cobra Kai wrote:I wanted pools to allow some sort of tracking down the line if there was tomfoolery in the night actions. We can do free for all though.

My concept was essentially- Players pick a pool of 4. Person above them in the OP vetoes one. Person below vetoes one. Players then target between the two.

Ninja-
I too am not opposed to looking at the hot hydra.

Why does it have to be so complicated vs something like target one of the three players below you

Still catching up, but did we ever get a Cakez case?

Because I understand a lot of this playerlist is excited about linking with certain people and wanted to make sure everyone had their fair chance. I did consider that option as well.