Mafiascum.net

yeet

Enchant [4]:

Bee, Titus, PenguinPower, ManateeGal

Thor Ragnarok [2]:

Miss Midnight, the worst

Harvey and Haley [2]:

Flea The Magician, Gamma Emerald

Miss Midnight [2]:

Thor Ragnarok, Cat Scratch Fever

Cat Scratch Fever [1]:

Enchant

ManateeGal [1]:

House

not voting [2]:

Something_Smart, Harvey and Haley

mod notes

~ dual mod iso

flavour

Nothing wrong with being neuroatypical

In post 1076, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nothing wrong with being neuroatypical

True.

In post 1074, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 1067, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 1060, Enchant wrote:Bee not townread now. Probably i am hypocrite, but she certanly doesh't care at all who is elimmed. As long as it's not her of course.

Where do you get this impression? She's been pretty vocal against a Thor wagon.

?

...

Eh. Why there's Thor.

She voted Penquin, MM and Me with "?" explaination, probably waiting if everyone will follow.
Maybe not scummy, but strange.

I also believe that scum would be less likely to shade someone for doing something that they know they are also guilty of doing, to the point where they draw attention to it, themselves, and not have reasons for why their behavior is different on some level than the person they're shading.

In post 1071, Enchant wrote:Did you call me autist.

Would that be a bad thing?

It would be a bad thing to make an assumption like that instead of asking, but he didn't do that. Don't need to dwell on it anymore.

That wasn't a question, and I am autistic so pardon if I'm a little on guard for that one :/

As much as I love crickets, I've heard enough of them for now, so I'm going to ask a question...

Whole this may seem like an attempt to kick off RQS, it's not. This is just one question, and hopefully it could have a positive impact on the game.

That question is:

What are your thoughts on only listing your top 2-3 interests in elimination instead of posting entire reads lists?

Personally, I'm all for it, and I'll explain why...

If several town have the same players in their top tier, those players become bullet magnets. By only posting scumreads, it keeps the strength of high townreads obscured by mingling them in with lesser townreads, which could save their lives for ELO.

While, yes, it would deny information to town, i think top townreads are more informational to scum than town.

In post 1083, House wrote:Whole this may seem

While*

How about people just vote people they are willing to elim (s_s included)?

In post 1083, House wrote:What are your thoughts on only listing your top 2-3 interests in elimination instead of posting entire reads lists?

So I think scum are usually competent enough to accurately judge which slots are the most townread anyway *shrug*

But I'm good with the idea of increased focus on slots people wanna elim and consolidate on wagons.

I like Titus' point about my interactions with Thor and Enchant.

VOTE: Miss Midnight

-Harvey

In post 1083, House wrote:What are your thoughts on only listing your top 2-3 interests in elimination instead of posting entire reads lists?

This seems reasonable
For me it’s probably Enchant/H+H

Daybreak arrives

Gamma's ISO seems devoid of content apart from House/Enchant/me.

-Harvey

I think that’s patently untrue but keep pushing lies if you think that helps

Okay, let me open up your ISO for posts about reads on players other than House/Enchant/me, scrolling from the bottom. You have 111 posts so far.

926 (#84): you don't know how to feel about tw prodding you
689 (#79): defense of thor's post
688 (#78): thor's post worrisome because gambler's fallacy
616 (#72): thor's post looks like filler
512 (#71): CSF town
...

Is that correct, till 512? Or have I missed out on any post?

-Harvey

I expressed town feelings on ManateeGal at one point, though you probably overlooked that in your haste to generalize my posts as dealing with 3 slots

In 334 (#40). Question still stands.

-Harvey.

That selective post range though :3

I think a more pertinent question is “why is Gamma focusing on certain slots more than others?”

In post 1095, Flea The Magician wrote:That selective post range though :3

I mean, his latter half of 111 posts? I was too lazy to go further up.

-Harvey

In post 1096, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think a more pertinent question is “why is Gamma focusing on certain slots more than others?”

Indeed. Is there more nuanced reasoning than the below?

In post 1009, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: harvey and haley
Idk about Enchant but I feel this is a decent vote seeing as I’ve seen like a few people express suspicion toward this slot and I also suspect them

In post 1015, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 849, House wrote:

In post 844, Enchant wrote:House, why you think i am mafia?

You have a high fluff to content ratio, and you're open to voting everyone you haven't arbitrarily townread, which you've given no reason for reading as town for most of us so you can flip your reads on us without having to explain why.

This seems like solid reasoning at least
I’ll still stay on H+H for science (aka leaving the potential for a counterwagon)

-Harvey

In post 1097, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 1095, Flea The Magician wrote:That selective post range though :3

I mean, his latter half of 111 posts? I was too lazy to go further up.

-Harvey

Which means your post and points are either lazy or theres nothing else to support your statement, but would in fact go against your accusation....