Mafiascum.net

yeet

toxictaipan [4]:

NorwegianboyEE, Gamma Emerald, Dwlee99, AliceK

NorwegianboyEE [2]:

Val89

, toxictaipan

AliceK [2]:

redtea, marcistar

T3 [1]:

Jolyne

Val89

[1]:

Not_Mafia

not voting [3]:

camelCasedSnivy, DArby, T3

mod notes

~ one two seven three

flavour

In post 1073, marcistar wrote:becuz i find it weird how the second they vote u u decide to change ur mind on toxic, not earlier.

Is this the only thing that's pinged you about Alice, or is there other things and that's just what tipped you over to vote?

Gamma has promised us a towncase; I've seen a few little things that ping me, but I do worry that Joylne has just posioned the challaice, and I might just be seeing things because I'm expecting to see them. As I said before, I can't really evaulate if there was anything to Jolynes read here at the time it was given if they don't want to explain it, and it's always possible they just pulled it out of nowhere. I don't really want to outline a case myself, because it's all too easy for people to take it, given I'm confirmed town, and go "yeah, that's exactly what I am seeing".

I'm not really seeing the thing with Alice. They got mislimmed day one in the last game I played with them, and I didn't find them particularly scummy there or here. Would rather kill toxic here

Just rep them.
They’re literally useless.

Like what’s the point in joining a game of deduction if you’re not going to even attempt to be readable.

In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just rep them.
They’re literally useless.

+1

In post 1072, Val89 wrote:@DArby; what do you think of Alice thus far?

I was actually going to make an Alice post last night but 961 made no fucking sense to me but I still read it as town so I dropped it.

I’m on mobile before work so bare with me here but on further thinking I don’t like any of these wagons here for the same meta argument I’ve pointed out twice now. That includes Alice. Redtea made the Meta Argument in 1066 for Norwe and Dwlee for Alice in 1077. I cannot independently verify until midterms are over tho :/

That being said, I do townlean Alice so far and I’m starting to be of the opinion all of these wagons are to town. I dunno what to do about it except go after the scummiest of the lot since there’s only 2 days or so left and see how they flip. Then again, I’m biased against newbie 2080 so there’s that.

I do think Marci is wrong, tho. Alice’s 1074 is a correct statement and I see Alice’s posting as unfortunate timing. Out of all wagons mentioned (norwee, toxic, T3, Alice), Alice is the least interesting wagon to me.

There is no meta argument for why Toxic is scum.

That Darby post reads so wishy-washy

In post 1083, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There is no meta argument for why Toxic is scum.

Refer to my 910 about the toxic exception. I’d rather wait d2 for a toxic wagon. If his only real case is feels robotic and low post count a town!toxic flip gives us nothing.

In post 1084, Dwlee99 wrote:That Darby post reads so wishy-washy

I hope it did cause I’m not really feeling what’s being dished out now, and I don’t want to be held to something I don’t believe in.

Okay but a red!toxic flip gives us something !

That’s crazy you got a point.

I mean obviously yeah but im not sold on scum!toxic. Im not sold on anyone. I’ll settle but even my top scum read feels flimsy.

I'm currently working on posting a quotewall of alice posts I like

In post 1080, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Like what’s the point in joining a game of deduction if you’re not going to even attempt to be readable.

It's actually a pretty smart strategy, just not a fun one
Normally why I try to be scummy when I'm town, since I'm really scummy when I'm scum

In post 1081, AliceK wrote:

In post 1079, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just rep them.
They’re literally useless.

+1

Not sure why he wasn't wotc'd.

In post 1090, camelCasedSnivy wrote:

In post 1080, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Like what’s the point in joining a game of deduction if you’re not going to even attempt to be readable.

It's actually a pretty smart strategy, just not a fun one
Normally why I try to be scummy when I'm town, since I'm really scummy when I'm scum

You policy lim these kind of players and I think the only reason why we are not doing that is that there will be a replacement who can make slot more readable.

These are some of the post I liked most

In post 94, AliceK wrote:

In post 55, T3 wrote:

In post 47, Jolyne wrote:not to towntell, but this game started?

I think Jolyne is town for this. They did a very similar thing in Purgatory when they townslipped but then admitted they didn't read the setup to make them have a higher chance of townslipping and this is reminding me of that.

"Didn't read the setup" townslip is very dangerous as it is easy too fake.

Good early vigilance (though I will admit, doesn't exactly mesh with her toxic defense later...?)

In post 177, AliceK wrote:

In post 109, marcistar wrote:

In post 87, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't wanna see anyone acting stupid this game, or you'll have my unlimited fury poured into destroying you. When I have a solve, you'll LISTEN TO IT.

depends

In post 95, AliceK wrote:VOTE: darby

I don't like his posts.

what dont u like about them

Comment about vig shot sounded fake. Almost like he tried very hard to act as uninformed as possible. This mindset comes from scum.

Good, thought-out early read.

In post 260, AliceK wrote:

In post 167, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think one of the few posts that pinged me as sus earlier is Alice’s: "T3 is being voted a lot, is there an meta reason for that?" post.

In post 168, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The only way to get reads is to keep the very real threat of DEATH hanging over the heads of those that wish to mislead us.

PROVE ME WRONG.

In post 169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: AliceK

Where is your head at ATM?

I see your point. I agree however I have a gut feeling that T3 is town and we should look somewhere else.

Trying to make better wagons happen, that's a town move imo, scum would tend to be indifferent to some degree (town can be too but I'm saying being picky about wagons is a towntell, that doesn't mean vice versa)

In post 261, AliceK wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

alicek

you seem fine enough rn, but

In post 93, AliceK wrote:

In post 19, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hey Alice, remember that time you asked me if i’d buss both my teammates as scum and i answered no then proceeded to endgame as mafia?


GOOD TIMES~

Haha, very well played. I was suspecting you, but couldn't find good arguments to accuse you. Just hoped I was paranoid. Didn't happen.

do you have any sort of read on norwegianboyee rn..? im curious if anything seems similar to that play you've seen from him, or if you have a townread on him..?

Not much yet. My belief is that people like norwegianboyee you caught in a later stage of the game as they are not doing many mistakes early. Nevertheless, I think in this game he is in "solving" attitude much earlier, so I would say a slight town-lean.

this feels like a very long-term-minded approach to norwee, which I think is town-indicative because scum would want to keep options open.

In post 466, AliceK wrote:

In post 307, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

toxictaipan

im interested in ur input on this val stuff, do u mind giving some thoughts about that and anything else u may have thought of..?

The past 13 pages are exhausting. If I were Val and scum in this situation, I'd be giving some better replies, though. Town is looking for an excuse to lim him and the chip on the shoulder attitude might just be it. I think scum Val would realize this and not be so standoffish.

I think the interactions between DArby and NorwegianboyEE are much more interesting, but can't quite pin a read either way on the two yet.

That's not quite valid. You assume that as Town he would not try to get out of bad situation. Of course you may say there is more Townies than Mafia (more spare parts ), but still it doesn't mean that a one would just give up.

It's not Val post what you should look at.
Also it is not clear for me what DArby's alignment is, but there are better options for today.
UNVOTE:

This was a pretty good post when Val was being targeted
while some people only tried to call Val not scum, Alice actually tried to push elsewhere as well

In post 954, AliceK wrote:I don't think toxic is Mafia, because these 2 posts:

In post 307, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

toxictaipan

im interested in ur input on this val stuff, do u mind giving some thoughts about that and anything else u may have thought of..?

The past 13 pages are exhausting. If I were Val and scum in this situation, I'd be giving some better replies, though. Town is looking for an excuse to lim him and the chip on the shoulder attitude might just be it. I think scum Val would realize this and not be so standoffish.

I think the interactions between DArby and NorwegianboyEE are much more interesting, but can't quite pin a read either way on the two yet.

Val was in quite bad spot. I don't think the low posting scum, would jump into the thread to provide arguments against elimination.

In post 308, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 306, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 305, marcistar wrote:

In post 1, Datisi wrote:~ all members of the

mafia

are

backup ascetics

. they may or may not have additional roles and/or modifiers.

wwhats an ascetic..

Check your role pm

Lol but for real, though. I honestly don't know either.

He would need to fake a townslip. That isn't something very popular to do.

while these aren't exactly strong points it felt like Alice meant what she was saying

In post 1086, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay but a red!toxic flip gives us something !

I think I've made a mistake here. If we are talking about red!Toxic clearing Norwee, I've been sat here stewing on a reason why I thought that wasn't the case, but when I've come to explain it in response to this, I realise I have credited toxic in my mind with saying something early while I was still the push; and it turns out it didn't actually come from toxic.

So, yeah, I messed up that one up. I'm going to go back and check the rest of my work and make sure I've not falsely attributed anything else.

At the end of the day, though, I still feel like a toxic flip is much more likley to flash green, and so even if there was something to learn from a red!toxic flip, it's fairly academic in nature. I am now coming round to why people think that assocative is there, though, particulary if we are probably dealing with 2 or 3 scum.

i ellitell as town btw

bah screw it we kill toxic

Jolyne, Jolyne, Jolyne, Joooolyyyyyyyyyyyyne, I'm begging of you please don't take my hammer

Next vote on toxic will be N_M-1, right?

Will you settle on a Toxic vote, Val?