Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:34 am
Easy targets are salsa/dorsey/gera, maybe a50 amd sely. Three?
datisi used it first. go elim him, mm?In post 1078, Iconeum wrote:i was somewhat catching up, read the word idiot ten times and decided to stop
I actually got a reasonable amount of sleep last night, thank you very little.In post 1022, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 1019, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’ll probably quote them in the morning (I’m up after a pretty freaky dream in the middle of the night rn)In post 1014, Salsabil Faria wrote:@GE, forgot to ask earlier, which posts of mine are stopping you to vote me?Sleep better
why?
It kinda is.In post 1031, Three wrote:That's...not particularly meta.In post 1029, Wiki wrote:More searching for scums, better reasons, more text and analysis of different optionsIn post 1028, Three wrote:What is your meta case?In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.
easy target to attack =/= easy target to misyeetIn post 1077, Wiki wrote:And u say i've found easy target in ico. Nice. So this is just a lie from Datisi, Datisi should be a scum, easy game
I canIn post 1084, Datisi wrote:@almost50, can you explain your takes in 767?
In post 1084, Datisi wrote:dogshit case
my case if perfect. there is nothing better here. you are a scum.In post 1085, Datisi wrote:your case is awful
In post 1080, Gamma Emerald wrote:I actually got a reasonable amount of sleep last night, thank you very little.In post 1022, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 1019, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’ll probably quote them in the morning (I’m up after a pretty freaky dream in the middle of the night rn)In post 1014, Salsabil Faria wrote:@GE, forgot to ask earlier, which posts of mine are stopping you to vote me?Sleep better
In post 1081, Dorsey wrote:I don't really get the hostility. I thought this was supposed to be fun.
VOTE: Andresvmb
then doIn post 1086, Almost50 wrote:I canIn post 1084, Datisi wrote:@almost50, can you explain your takes in 767?
because he's not interesting in sorting and is just looking for level zero bullshit he can pushIn post 1089, Dwlee99 wrote:Why the fuck are you voting wiki rn datisi
Icon didn’t really feel towny and the case seemed somewhat reasonableIn post 1084, Datisi wrote:because people obviously aren't reading my posts
@almost50, can you explain your takes in 767?
@gamma emerald, why did you vote iconeum after that dogshit case?