Page 44 of 108
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:45 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 949, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm being obtuse? That's fucking rich. Are you not reading my posts?
I'll state it again, just to be clear.
YOUR SLOT GAVE ALIANNA NO WAY OUT. That is scummy.
I AM NOT BLAMING THE ENTIRE ELIM ON YOU. I AM SAYING THAT YOUR PUSH/VOTE WAS BAD AND IT LOOKS SCUMMY.
You have not, and continue not to, refute my point regarding your slot giving Alianna no way out because you know it is true and this is the main cause for my read.
Instead, you chose to try and conflate two issues so that you could call my hypocritical when in fact I am not being hypocritical whatsoever. Now you've resorted to calling me obtuse because, again, you simply have no answer to my reasoning for why I scum read you.
VOTE: Fun Times
Please stop fighting I beg of you
I think you're right but Fun Times is made up of two very emotional players
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:47 pm
by PenguinPower
I don’t think he’s right but I agree with the rest.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:49 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:00 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 980, Fun Times wrote: In post 949, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm being obtuse? That's fucking rich. Are you not reading my posts?
I'll state it again, just to be clear.
YOUR SLOT GAVE ALIANNA NO WAY OUT. That is scummy.
I AM NOT BLAMING THE ENTIRE ELIM ON YOU. I AM SAYING THAT YOUR PUSH/VOTE WAS BAD AND IT LOOKS SCUMMY.
You have not, and continue not to, refute my point regarding your slot giving Alianna no way out because you know it is true and this is the main cause for my read.
Instead, you chose to try and conflate two issues so that you could call my hypocritical when in fact I am not being hypocritical whatsoever. Now you've resorted to calling me obtuse because, again, you simply have no answer to my reasoning for why I scum read you.
VOTE: Fun Times
You’re either obtuse or scum. Should I make 50,000 more posts saying this, because I would absolutely enjoy doing that.
I’m done with you.
~N
Please, we must work together
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:01 pm
by Not_Mafia
Illogical doesn't equal scum
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:04 pm
by Not_Mafia
Let's just stop engaging Nancy please
The slot is town. It's not productive It does nothing but derail the thread
Capiche?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:06 pm
by PenguinPower
I literally said I didn’t agree in the post above you.
And, obviously I have reads. Sorry if I’m not spoon feeding them to you.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:08 pm
by Not_Mafia
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:09 pm
by Not_Mafia
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:10 pm
by Not_Mafia
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:12 pm
by Not_Mafia
This is what I want to see
Let's heal the divide
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:13 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 1046, Fun Times wrote: In post 1036, Fun Times wrote: In post 1021, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not focused on dead town.
I'm focused on alive scum providing bad reasoning to elim previously alive town that are now dead.
Nancy couldn't address my concerns, I was hoping that you might be able to?
That said, I like the Goldfish stuff.
You are seriously exasperating. You obviously agreed with this so-called “bad reasoning”. Want me to dig up all of your hypocritical posts agreeing with it? Being wrong doesn’t make us scum.
I can’t even have a rational conversation with you. so I won’t bother.
~N
In post 1037, Fun Times wrote:UNVOTE:
Goldfish hasn’t posted anywhere in days, so still don’t know what to make of it. Andante agrees with me on BBT having selective amnesia.
lololol
VOTE: BBT
You didn’t respond to this.
Maybe because you said you were done with him
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:13 pm
by Not_Mafia
Good solution
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:14 pm
by Not_Mafia
Emotional and obtuse =/= scummy
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:14 pm
by Not_Mafia
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:15 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 1056, Fun Times wrote:
Let’s play I’m rubber you’re glue a few hundred more times shall we or you could you know, just stop playing dumb and recognize that your posts 100% back up everything I’ve been saying.
~N
Just stop responding
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:16 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 1071, Somnus wrote:Not_Mafia: You've made a lot of quick, 1-line observations, but I can't tell who you town-read and who you scum-read.
I scumread Froggo slot
I'd think that was obvious
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:17 pm
by Not_Mafia
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:22 pm
by Somnus
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 1:36 pm
by PenguinPower
that's how things exist in this universe.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:07 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:09 pm
by Not_Mafia
In post 1095, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.
But nobody is saying that my comrade
We're asking why that was the first thing you felt the need to comment on
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:11 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1095, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.
You also don't know the roles or what any other slot has done in the game - I find the notion that you care about a slot you do know the role of more than those you don't to be rather silly.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:13 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
In post 1097, PenguinPower wrote: In post 1095, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.
You also don't know the roles or what any other slot has done in the game - I find the notion that you care about a slot you do know the role of more than those you don't to be rather silly.
Are you saying I should leave myself open to being contradicted and blindsided by the prior tenant's actions?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:13 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1098, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 1097, PenguinPower wrote: In post 1095, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.
You also don't know the roles or what any other slot has done in the game - I find the notion that you care about a slot you do know the role of more than those you don't to be rather silly.
Are you saying I should leave myself open to being contradicted and blindsided by the prior tenant's actions?
I'm saying the fact that you care about maintaining internal consistency with your prior slot's actions is scummy...yes.