Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:51 pm
Yea, SK be trollin.
Im of to bed, so catch up in morning.
Im of to bed, so catch up in morning.
Scumhunter wrote:You got this document from someone else or from your role PM?
Scumhunter wrote:What is the name of your document?
Scumhunter wrote:Do you know what happens if someone gets a hold of all of them?
Scumhunter wrote:so you are willing to trust the word of the uncc'd cop's guilty
jasonT1981 wrote:Since I believe Quilford is scum, It is my job to try and discredit his arguments and show him up as scum.
Quilford wrote:
Scumhunter wrote:so you are willing to trust the word of the uncc'd cop's guilty
1)We don't actually know if he's a cop
2) I'm a miller
You're completely dead set on me being scum and it's just because the cop has a guilty on me. I don't get it.
Scumhunter wrote:Quilford wrote:
Scumhunter wrote:so you are willing to trust the word of the uncc'd cop's guilty
1)We don't actually know if he's a cop
2) I'm a miller
You're completely dead set on me being scum and it's just because the cop has a guilty on me. I don't get it.
Bolded is 110% a slip.Your role PM says you are a miller and you don't think we have a cop in the setup?
Also, your answers to my questions were very very helpful. /sarcasm
Implosion wrote:Also: we need to choose a night executioner. I would vote for either myself or Zang a second time, at this point.
ML wrote:SK: If you are town, why in hell were you considering faking a cop
ML wrote:I am calling for SK to claim
SK wrote:I will also confirm that is was me who hypothesized that the killer takes papers
ML wrote:Alright, caught up, and with tons to say. Given the amount of information there is, I am going to attempt to keep this concise. First things first, my reads before I woke up today.. AKA before anything with any cop claims:
ML wrote:why would anyone not want to be day executioner?
ML wrote:I believe there is a possibility that we have 4 scum, not definite, but possible.
ML wrote:Is Quil mafia or miller? 50/50 chance, no way to prove since CC mentioned documents first
ML wrote:If SH is town, as I strongly believe he is,
ML wrote:If asked for a case I will provide.
SH wrote:Medicated Lain, thank you I think I love you. I've been waiting for someone to look past the "omg scummy" part of me counterclaiming and analyzing my possible motives for doing so. Very clear town motives. Suicidal as scum.
SH wrote:This day has turned into a "shut up and kill SH" game
ML wrote:Zang, Implosion, who would you kill tonight? (hint: the correct answer is MOI, unless proof can be shown to me why it would be bad.)
SH wrote:(I'd honestly be surprised if I made it through the day here unless he reconsiders what you are saying).
ML wrote:I see no reason why it makes sense to let Quil live to night
ML wrote:Assume Quil is mafia and SH is not. Quil knows his death is coming, and is throwing a townie under the wheel before he dies. Seems likely.
ML wrote:SK stated earlier that he believes that papers pass on to the killer when someone dies, he verified this last page. So if that's true
Quilford wrote:Why would scum have papers. They would never pass them on.
ML wrote:Scum do not get to choose who they kill in this game, so they need to come up with whatever ways they can to push kills on town. If Quil dies and is mafia, what do you guys think the chances that SH is mafia? I'd say just about 0. Quil is likely pushing a town kill before his own demise.
ML wrote:Because there is a guilty on you, and we have no way to prove that you are not lying about being a miller, other than to kill you. You are either a miller, or scum. And if you are a miller, it is easier to assume that there is a 3 person scum team, have you been reading anything I've said here?
Cosca wrote:OK. Please hold off executing until it has been posted, which, as I mentioned, may take several days until the other head of the hydra has returned.
Cosca wrote:I'd prefer to have an executioner who agrees at least somewhat with our reads go over the votes. Why listen to a scum player or a VI when deciding the execution
Cosca wrote:Also there is the case of a stalemate with an equal number of votes for the top two candidates. What would you do in such a situation?
Cosca wrote:Finally, there is the night execution which will be decided by the executor alone (which must be agreed upon first), or would you also want to hold a vote for it?
Cosca wrote:If we'd fallen for the Scumhunter/MoI gambit and there had been no Zang counter-claim, Scumhunter would be dead but MoI practically conftown.
Cosca wrote:Do you know the exact voting mechanics and the number and nature of scum players? No? Then you haven't proven anything.
Cosca wrote:SK is an incredibly annoying idiot, but he is an incredibly annoying town idiot.
Jason wrote:Well given there is a cop guilty on Quil, and he is claiming to have papers... isnt this a logical change of mind and not so out of the blue like you are making it?
Jason wrote:exactly.. AFTER the guilty.
ML wrote:This is what I am talking about SK, what did you mean by this post?
ML wrote:Of course my ideas are changing, I just read about 40 pages of game and then jumped right in at about the craziest point possible! Then I start communicating ideas... you think it's bad to theorize any possibility you can think of? We are not 100% certain on the info given to us, so we have to think of what possible choices make the most sense to benefit the town
ML wrote:Looking at everything that SK is saying right now, my scumdar on SK is going through the roof
ML wrote:changing an opinion does not count as fence sitting!
ML wrote:Everyone knew you were going to be nigh executioner, if you killed a claimed pro town role on night one, of course it would be your death bed today!
ML wrote:A bigger question would be, if you sincerely believe that either SK or I were actually scum, as you have just listed we were some of your top reads, then why would you NOT have killed either of us? You had the opportunity, and if you really thought that we were scum, then I assume you would have killed one of us. So why didn't you?
ML wrote:HF was the one player in this game who was willing to question your ideas, and wonder about you. We already know that you killed HF, unlike a regular mafia game.. the question in this game is is why? And this is the answer that I see
Cosca wrote:So you believe Zang should listen to you, vezok and SK?
Cosca wrote:You know where we got the idea for a traitor from? From the first Execution Mafia. We already speculated about traitors and several scum factions here.
Another MoI lie noted
Cosca wrote:Once again, MoI invents a scumtell out of thin air and completely ignores what we actually wrote.
Implosion wrote:You're the one who wanted to know why you're scum.
SH wrote:aTe is not a scumtell you moron.
SH wrote:You can speculate that MoI would be a good target to fake on, but no, you are wrong. He wouldn't be. If I were scum there is no way in hell I'd fake on MoI there. That's just poor play. You can call it wifom but its not. Its poor play. Scum play dictates securing easily attainable mislynches at little risk
SH wrote:1) We don't actually know if he's a cop
SH wrote:I understand the explanation of why I did what I did goes way over your head. Its okay. I don't mind stupid people. Actually I'm friends with quite a few. I just hate it when morons like you pretend like you actually have a clue about anything. That confidence coming from an ignorant fuck is rage-inducing and probably the reason for why genocide happens.
SH wrote:his game was advertised as "slightly bastard", after all, and I've seen at least one setup before that had a miller but no cop (and it garnered a lot of attention).
Quilford wrote:Scumhunter wrote:so you are willing to trust the word of the uncc'd cop's guilty
1) We don't actually know if he's a cop
2) I'm a miller
You're completely dead set on me being scum and it's just because the cop has a guilty on me. I don't get it.
Quilford wrote:scumhunter dearest why would I claim miller as scum
why
why
why
Quilford wrote:implosion claiming miller as scum would ensure my death
as we can see quite clearly
I would've pushed the theory that Zang was scum or an insane cop. I'm not dumb enough to claim miller as scum, especially not after a cop guilty on me.