↑ Captain Leela wrote:I waslying? Hyperbole much? I don't have the thread memorized; logic would dictate that I either didn't notice your post or forgot that you had written it.
Nice try, but you just finished reviewing the thread and you were quoting posts as early as 875. I find it hard to believe that you just "forgot" my post when you would have read it like 15 minutes before you posted, as it was quite recent.
Yes, Porochaz did something scummy, but do you actually believe it was ascumslip? And CD...scumslipped? This is pretty much the stupidest reason to be voting for someone. I'd like to know what you think a scumslip is, because almost every time I've seen someone get strung up because of a "scumslip" it's a townie. Misused words, pronoun changes, inconsistency in thought or action, grammatical issues, etc all come from town just as much as they come from scum. It's a humanslip, it's not a scumslip. In fact, they're more likely to come from town than they are to come from scum because town has no reason to really pay attention to what they write; therefore, they're automatically going to make mistakes in logic or whatever. Scum have the incentive to be careful fo what they say, so they're more likely to fix these things. So while it's fine to point these things out or think it's suspicious, on its own it doesn't prove that someone is scum.
What a nice, long, useless paragraph. Here's what I think is a scumslip: Poro moved his vote away from MoS, onto a wagon supported by MoS, while simultaneously claiming that he still has problems with MoS. That doesn't make sense from a town perspective.
Is this how you always scum hunt? You know who predominantly "hunt" for scum this way? Scum do...when they're looking for mislynches. Scum know who town is so it's harder for them to hunt in a way that's less mechanical so they tend to focus on these little verifiables. "Oh look a contradiction" "Oh look a scumslip" It's a nice way to look like you're hunting for scum when what you're really doing is hunting for a mislynch.
Even if you don't agree with my case against CD, I was
voting him before I made that argument.
So your position that I'm just using it to "hunt for a mislynch" is bullshit.It's funny how many posts you have conveniently "forgotten" even though you just read through that portion of the thread.
A preemptive defense! How awesome! Can you explain to me why you felt the need to defend yourself before Porochaz had a chance to answer the question I posed tohim?
LOL, nice try.
You put two and two together and came up with that? You should probably go back to kindergarten if you think that looks anything like four. Considering that his last statement was "Yeah, I should've listened to me, and not these other idiots. GreyICE and UN have lost all talking priviliges," and that his last vote before moving to Haylen was on you, I think it's very highly likely that he would be voting you today. You look like you're making stuff up to try to make yourself look good.
Again, nice try, but Glork specifically said that two of his teammates were contradicting him on his scumread for me.
--------------------------------
In short:
You sure have overlooked or "forgotten" a lot of posts in order to make your points, even though you just replaced in and apparently just read through the thread/current events. Combine that with the fact that Om of the Nom claimed that he was replacing out because the game was moving too fast -- yet he was just spotted joining another game -- indicates that his replace-out was tactical in nature.HI SCUM
Wouldn't that be evidence that I'm practicing distancing with Deltawave? Isn't a good portion of the argument against Poro was that he was voting MoS, then said he still was suspicious of MoS and voted on the wagon with MoS, which means he's practicing distancing with MoS? So you're telling me I should move my vote and do the same exact thing that you're voting Poro for? Am I missing something?