Page 45 of 82
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:58 am
by Majiffy
↑ borkjerfkin wrote: ↑ Majiffy wrote:KMD bus your buddy and join me on the Utc wagon.
uh why even start the uct wagon if you think kmd is bussing?
Smaller selection pool that KMD is not a part of. ISO me you derp.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:19 am
by pirate mollie
↑ buldermar wrote: ↑ pirate mollie wrote:did you just use a gambler's fallacy here? LOLOLOLOL
No he didn't, that would be an interpretation. He made no such interpretation, he merely stated stats which, for all we know, could be accurate.
point conceded
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:26 am
by buldermar
↑ Maenara wrote:
I most humbly present to y'all the following quote:
↑ uctriton00 wrote:Not voting Maenara today. He reminds me of me when I'm town.
...so, I don't remind you of you in this game?
VOTE: UCT
Unless he bases his votes on quotes of people supposedly not voting others that reminds them of themselves when they're town when he's town himself. In that case, you will remind him of himself in this game.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:33 am
by Majiffy
Can the above be simplified? I need a road map about halfway through the first sentence.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:34 am
by pirate mollie
↑ borkjerfkin wrote: ↑ uctriton00 wrote:Bork why am I included in your list in #1073?
It's a gut thing mostly based on your brief interaction with me around ~440. Not much has changed about my opinion of you since then. I've been going back and forth on whether or not asking about this is a towntell or not and I think that self aware scum might do it too so I'm calling it null.
Mollie that gambler's fallacy stuff from Nacho is tongue-in-cheek (and is an appropriate response as any to the original silly question from NS anyway). I find it odd you're calling attention to it.
I find it odd that you find it odd.
it should be obvious that I was reading nacho's posts in iso and I cam across it. I conceded the point to buldey that nacho was not using it as an argument however I am not ruling out the implication piece that would certainly go along with it wit the original intent of the post. ----> looking at body of work and still haven't entirely solidified my opinion.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:40 am
by pirate mollie
↑ Kmd4390 wrote:Penguin lynch is a horrible idea.
I actually agree with this.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:41 am
by Majiffy
Glad we all agree. Lets lynch utc.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:43 am
by pirate mollie
↑ Majiffy wrote:Can the above be simplified? I need a road map about halfway through the first sentence.
I actually could follow all of that. in other words projection isn't a scumtell.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:44 am
by Kmd4390
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:44 am
by borkjerfkin
1076 looks like a halfhearted case on Nacho, and that gambler's fallacy point you made on it is shitty. If you conceded the point anyway, why is it odd that I'm calling attention to it?
I don't see a compelling reason to lynch UCT.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:47 am
by Majiffy
borkjerfkin wrote:I don't see a compelling reason to lynch UCT.
Narrower lynch pool.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:48 am
by borkjerfkin
I'm just clarifying: you're lynching from the pool of people ON Fe and OFF LS? Or is there some other metric you're using to divide them?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:49 am
by Majiffy
Rach vote count and deadline please.
p-edit: Different metric. I told you to ISO me.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:50 am
by Majiffy
But since you're lazy
↑ Majiffy wrote:Group A: uctriton00, Buldemar, pirate mollie, penguin_alien
Group B: Kmd4390, Nachomamma8, borkjerfkin, Maenara, Nobody Special, the director
We've probably got one scum in each group. A is off the wagon, B is on the wagon.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:50 am
by borkjerfkin
how about you just fucking say it here so we don't have to go through this crap?
p-edit: what is the metric for who goes into what group?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:51 am
by borkjerfkin
aka which wagon are you talking about?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:51 am
by Majiffy
LS wagon.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:54 am
by borkjerfkin
Why do you automatically buy into the theory that it's 1 off 1 on a wagon on town? Why are you not looking at the Fe wagon to do this (not that I'm saying it's airtight that 1 scum bussed and 1 didn't but there's probably more precedent for that and no I have nothing to back that up with)
Hell look at the game I just got done modding....shos and Zar were both on wagons on town on more than one occasion.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:55 am
by borkjerfkin
If anything I'd be saying that there's likely to be at least one scum ON LS and probably is impossible to divine anything further from the situation.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:56 am
by Majiffy
Nature and speed of the wagon makes it unlikely. Fast-moving town wagons are not something scum like to fuck with in droves.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:04 am
by Majiffy
Head count. Possibly inaccurate.
Kmd4390 (L-4) Buldemar, NS
Penguin (L-2) Director, Nacho, Bork, Uct
NS (L-5) Penguin
Uct (L-3) Majiffy, Maenara, KMD
Not Voting
pirate mollie, uctriton00
With 11 it takes 6 to lynch
(expired on 2013-01-14 17:06:10)
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:04 am
by Majiffy
*Uct is voting Penguin, not not-voting
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:05 am
by borkjerfkin
I guess given that you believe that (which is a stumbling block for me because I have no experience with that and you could just be totally bullshitting me), you've PoEd everyone else in group A away so the vote makes sense -- although I'd like to hear more why penguin is town because I thought the way penguin handled the LS wagon was pretty bad.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:06 am
by Majiffy
What's so awful about it?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:08 am
by borkjerfkin
borkjerfkin wrote:I agree with director about penguin's denouncement of the LS wagon -- post #895 looks to me like penguin is actually preparing herself to jump ON that wagon if she needed to, but in #1058 she very much distances herself from that wagon.