Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:41 am
CDB FOR QUADZ BUDDY #1
To be fair, saying you're not interested in an argument between two people usually means that you're not interestedIn post 1099, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm not a fan of Reck being flat-out wrong on Tim calling him v Sixty "town v town" and I'm not convinced that it's an innocent mistake given that he initially seemed to take their post in the way that was intended. It's possible that it's just Reck losing track of something by nature of getting more invested into an argument and I got slight town vibes off some other of his posts in the last 10 pages so I'm going with a big fat fence-sit here - though that definitely puts him on a list of people for whom I would vote today.
are you so bad now that you think people who protect each other in thread are scum togetherIn post 1100, Katsuki wrote:CDB FOR QUADZ BUDDY #1
no you didn't, you thought i was playingIn post 1092, Nero Cain wrote:I knew you were a claimed Jiffy.
Sometimes, sometimes not. I think context is important and my feeling on both those heads is that they're more likely to be "not interested" in a 'this is annoying to read and there are not enough useful reads coming from it to be worth the bother' manner than a 'this is town v town and therefore boring' manner.In post 1102, xRECKONERx wrote:To be fair, saying you're not interested in an argument between two people usually means that you're not interestedbecauseit's town on town (more often than not).
What I tried to make clear in my post was that simply misinterpreting would not be scummy; it would be wilful distortion of the point in order to manoeuvre yourself onto a non-you lynch wagon that I would find scummy. I currently don't feel there's enough for me to come down on that latter conclusion, which is why I'm voting for someone other than you.I fail to see how me being wrong about this makes me scummy, though.
Sixty doesn't have any votes at the moment so wasn't included in my run-down of feelings on current wagons, because I feel like we need to consolidate existing wagons into a lynch, not continue to flap about incoherently. Having somewhat skimread that whole argument (because I too found it kind of boring) my feeling was that the whole FoG thing looks like a difference in expectations between the two of you, rather than a scummy misrepresentation.Sixty did something much more egregious in saying I had been told about Fall of Gondolin before I began attacking them (or whatever it was) when in fact I hadn't. Why is Sixty not on your list?
The fact that CDB is fine with me, as a POLICY LYNCH of all things is lynchworthy.In post 1103, xRECKONERx wrote:are you so bad now that you think people who protect each other in thread are scum togetherIn post 1100, Katsuki wrote:CDB FOR QUADZ BUDDY #1
Since when?In post 1108, Katsuki wrote:The fact that CDB is fine with me, as a POLICY LYNCH of all things is lynchworthy.
I don't see that comment coming from CDBtown at all.
A+ post, I fell in love.In post 895, sangres wrote:As you point out, there isn't really time for this sort of back and forth, but I'm going to point out anyway that this post comes off to me as "Bitch? I didn't bitch at you. bitchbitch some decent content bitch."In post 890, Sixty wrote:Okay, first. I was not "bitching" at you, so please cut the attitude because this game has had plenty of that at this point, including by us. Don't create conflict for conflict's sake.In post 884, sangres wrote:Bitch at us all you like, but ffery-head is not going to be a day 1 fearless leader in this player list, and nacho-head's availability is limited.In post 869, Sixty wrote:Then make it happen? You are voting on a wagon of one and not making an effort to push it.In post 868, sangres wrote:Agree re the Tim lynch.
You're voting Katsuki. You're the only slot voting Katsuki. It's three days to deadline, ten to lynch, and you're voting Katsuki... and you say you don't want Tim Howard lynched. Thenmake it happen. Nobody's asking you to be a fearless leader, and frankly I don't care about Nacho's availability. But if you make statements like that, either back them up with actions that help it, or accept the consequences of not doing anything to reach it. And voting Katsuki with no real push, at this stage? That's "doing nothing".
Cut by my other half and there are fireworks going out. Let's make things happen because apparently sangres isn't the hero Gotham needs.
I want to do some quick pulse checking before I decide if/where to move our vote.
Is there a reason you're as opposed to Katsuki as you are?In post 834, chamber wrote:I don't like tim howard for scum at all. My only experience playing with nexus that I remember was when I hydra'd with him as an SK. He made one post that game because it was deadline and he knew I was afk. I made literally every other post, because he didn't want to as scum. I didn't see that reservation in him here.
You're on the town side of null, but still very much null.
Confession: I totally autofiltered this into Donald Duck singing a bawdy. I clearly dislike myself.In post 1087, xRECKONERx wrote:SIXTY DO U THINK IM PRETTY? :3
You can't tell the difference between me and ffery posting and that's your excuse?In post 838, Katsuki wrote:THEN SIGN YOUR BLOODY POSTSIn post 819, sangres wrote:This is actually just wrong.In post 800, Katsuki wrote:So Nacho's spent the last 25 pages dancing around this read and you've been doing nothing but being the song to Nacho's dance.In post 783, sangres wrote:In post 778, Flipping Awesome wrote:Katsuki doesn't do that as scum but is much more involved with the game and actually has some semblance of "pro-town" play.somethingabout his play struck nacho quite strongly as scum-katsuki. I don't really want to downgrade that without knowing more of the basis for it. I may move our vote tomorrow if I don't hear from him, but won't be calling katsuki town on my own.
I maen fuck I've given Nacho all the chances in the world to try and salvage his reputation but its like he's insistent on claiming scum and getting the slot nuked.
I haven't posted in a very long time (haven't posted since you said my name last, in fact), which is something I'm pretty sure you're aware of. You haven't given me anything except for one (1) chance to unvote you/recognize you're town, and that warn off came in the form of a late and weak "town Nacho would see town Katsuki", which doesn't cut it for me.
You didn't answer the question. I know you can answer questions, Katsuki.In post 839, Katsuki wrote:TROLL AROUND YOU?In post 816, sangres wrote:The teeheeing began originally because I didn't buy your vote on me coming from town-Kats. Yeah, I was shit talking and being obnoxious, but was decently town while doing it and would expect you to recognize + appreciate that. Now, I wonder why you would troll around with me instead of immediately call me out on my shit like you've done in most games together, and I wonder why you'd hold onto this reasoning and only deposit it now. Did you not want our exchange to get serious until the town was already led off on a good number of dumb wagons?In post 626, Katsuki wrote:TOWN NACHO WOULD TOTALLY BE TOWNREADING MEIn post 616, sangres wrote:I think Nacho will have a little time for this game tomorrow. I was expecting to have more time as well, but we'll see how it goes I guess.In post 604, Cerulean wrote:nacho/ffery - early thoughts on venmar?
I have never played with scum-Venmar, and it's been a while since I did a meta scan. So, I have a town-Venmar model that's probably a little sketchy and no scum-Venmar model at all. Nacho and I recently helped get him mislynched in a PoE situation where we both really thought he'd looked pretty town earlier in the game. To me, in this game so far, Venmar is coming off pretty similar to Xenosaga in tone, level of involvement, etc.
But, to a large extent I depended on Nacho's meta read in that game, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if Nacho sees an issue or two that I don't.
However, it will surprise me quite a bit if Nacho changes his mind about Katsuki given what he's posted this week.
Does Empire have an opinion on Venmar?
NOT TEEHEEING A KATS LYNCH
LOOK AT YOUR OWN PLAY
IN NATIS MINI 1543
I FUCKING CALLED YOUR SHIT OUT WHEN YOU COULDNT RESIST MY BAIT
EVERYTHING'S BEEN STRAIGHT FORWARD
So... Do you have an opinion on the reasoning that's currently calling her town?In post 842, kanyeknowsbest wrote:i do not have a confident read on her, but i know how as scum she can rev up from being a early common town read and honestly im going to treat everything she posts w. a grain of salt until shes mod confirmed. if you think that makes me scum then fuckin alright nacho lmaoIn post 818, sangres wrote:Do you think she's scum? Or are you just kicking up paranoia to kick up paranoia?In post 769, kanyeknowsbest wrote:hey can i just give a general reminder 2 everyone who is reading lld as SOLFID FUcking town that lld is Absolutely Excellent @ Scum ty 4 keeping this in mind.
I think your Tim Horton read is also p horribleIn post 843, kanyeknowsbest wrote:thtat said im pretty sure youre wrong about katsuki and also not convinced abt your shadowy read well ttyl
You think that if he decided to pull the Sixty shenanigans as scum, then he would drop it the moment you voted 60 because of fire and ice?In post 861, kanyeknowsbest wrote:re: zedio my original scum read was based on his really odd play around my 60 vote and his declaration that he was going to be doing something different. i reexamined him after his tim vote (which i really liked, the way he went abt it and everything) and his following play around that. but the real clincher for me is i put myself in his shoes, and were right on the tail of fire and ice where he became really obvscum day1 by getting stuck in the trap that is arguing w. me abt stupid shit. i take that into consideration and as scum in this game i think that he simply avoids me early since he knows it wont get him anywhere, which is pretty conflicting w. his move to jump hard on my 60 vote.