Page 45 of 99
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:37 pm
by StrangerCoug
Burning_Earth (1): MafiaSSK
ika (1): Burning_Earth
MafiaSSK (3): goodmorning, bubbajack8, Titus
Titus (2): Jingle, Guyett
Not voting (4): Dr Pants, ika, Snork, Antihero
With
11
players alive, it takes
6
votes to lynch a player.
Day 2 ends in
(expired on 2014-06-09 09:00:00).
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:42 pm
by ika
titus: one final question, will you accept you might be todays lynch more or less for info assuming you are town?
p-edit: she*
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:44 pm
by Titus
ika, I never accept my lynch. EVER. I know I am the "info" lynch but info lynches suck balls. If I get lynched, that's the way the game goes. If I accept my lynch, I selfvote. I'd only self-vote at deadline. I make scums fill the slots on my wagon. How many times do I say it? We lynch for scum, not for information.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:54 pm
by ika
mod: did mafia have pregame chat?
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:06 pm
by StrangerCoug
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:06 pm
by Guyett
A better question would be if scum have day chat
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:11 pm
by ika
was asked and mod wouldnt answer.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:11 pm
by Guyett
I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
To back that up I checked another game of SC's that I didn't play and the same applies
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:12 pm
by Guyett
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:14 pm
by Dr Pants
after the excitement has worn off of Guy's fake vig play, GM's point that the arguments on titus look to be confbias seem correct. Still, I think there's something there for Titus being scum that has more substance. I'll look into this a bit, but for now I think its that Titus played the day very "safe".
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:16 pm
by Titus
In post 1109, Dr Pants wrote:after the excitement has worn off of Guy's fake vig play, GM's point that the arguments on titus look to be confbias seem correct. Still, I think there's something there for Titus being scum that has more substance. I'll look into this a bit, but for now I think its that Titus played the day very "safe".
What about my play has been safe? I've been aggressively going after scum and going after my townreads. Just because I was universally townread before Jingle spewed his shit doesn't make my play safe. I'm townread because I don't do the safe play.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:20 pm
by Dr Pants
you've been aggressive with Anti but not really anyone else. The only other person you went after was Ika, but you stopped pursuit on that pretty quickly.
note that what I'm saying is that I dont think you should get run out for the stuff with Guy's fake vig, if anything I'm saying a lynch on you needs to be founded in something more substantial.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:21 pm
by ika
In post 1107, Guyett wrote:
I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
To back that up I checked another game of SC's that I didn't play and the same applies
im well aware of his past games (street racer i was in), but it doesnt exclude the chance of him throwing a wrench into play
p-edit: well the fact that GM stats she town-reads all her scums bugs the shit out of me now
know what, i no longer can sort anything out untill i get a flip or jester comes on and explains the
Obvi!sucm SSK to Titus vote to me.
titus: thats the other problem, when your univerasly town, something off. your more misunderstood as town then you are scum. The fact you are making sense to others is why im continued to get paranoid.
Are you willing to countervote jingle in place of SSK right now?
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:20 pm
by Titus
ika, I am aware of that. Unfortunately, that's why I try to clarify the moonlogic = Titus is town. People in this game are taking the time to break down my posts, so I don't have to say something 10 times, but for Anti. You're being transparent.
I'd be willing to vote Jingle. I'm just trying not to confbias him for his shitty meta comments. You and I both know they are shit.
I want to lynch: SSK
I can lynch: Jingle
I refuse to lynch: SSK
Clear?
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:21 pm
by Titus
In post 1111, Dr Pants wrote:you've been aggressive with Anti but not really anyone else. The only other person you went after was Ika, but you stopped pursuit on that pretty quickly.
note that what I'm saying is that I dont think you should get run out for the stuff with Guy's fake vig, if anything I'm saying a lynch on you needs to be founded in something more substantial.
I was aggressive with everyone trying to bring SSK to the forefront. I was aggressive with ika until I townread him. I am still aggressive with SSK. I'm aggressive with Jingle, but restraining myself a little there.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:45 pm
by ika
no....
moonlogic=you make sense=your scum
no logic=you make no sense=your town
this is how everyone seems to read you for your meta. this is why im trying to sort things out.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:59 pm
by Dr Pants
titus did you mean to have SSK as both want to lynch and refuse to lynch?
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:09 pm
by Titus
Pants, no. I meant refuse to lynch me. I'm tired and sleepy.
That meta makes me cry ika. It precludes me from ever being good town. Scum love it regardless of who they are.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:25 pm
by ika
In post 1117, Titus wrote:Pants, no. I meant refuse to lynch me. I'm tired and sleepy.
That meta makes me cry ika. It precludes me from ever being good town. Scum love it regardless of who they are.
Well thats how many have preceved you. I just poke you untill i figure something out.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:23 pm
by Jingle
In post 1113, Titus wrote:ika, I am aware of that. Unfortunately, that's why I try to clarify the moonlogic = Titus is town. People in this game are taking the time to break down my posts, so I don't have to say something 10 times, but for Anti. You're being transparent.
I'd be willing to vote Jingle. I'm just trying not to confbias him for his shitty meta comments. You and I both know they are shit.
I want to lynch: SSK
I can lynch: Jingle
I refuse to lynch: SSK
Clear?
This. This is why I want to lynch Titus. I've mentioned Titus' meta four times. The first was before reading any of her posts, to tell Anti that getting angry because her logic doesn't mesh is stupid. The second was that I felt Titus' early play was avoiding making any waves or offending too many people. Both of the others are directly addressing self meta. Titus tunnels as both alignments, for example,
Scum-Tunneling Titus. The final reference to meta was me responding to you saying I should know you're town based on meta. Tell me, how many games have we been in together? How many games have I as town correctly read your alignment?
Keep the bullshit coming, it's making me laugh.
I prefer Titus, because she's scum and a high information lynch.
I would love to lynch SSK, because he's also scum, but he can wait 'til tomorrow.
Lynching Jingle is a bad idea.
Also, why the fuck was anyone surprised I was willing to vote Titus when she has been my biggest scumread since I first started reading this game? Are you paying any attention at all?
In post 1027, Titus wrote:He also omitted my attempts to get the conversation to turn to SSK. When it didn't I tried to go with the will of the group, then Anti obvscummed.
I'm sorry, I must have missed this. Links please? Same with my 'meta arguments.'
In post 1061, Titus wrote: In post 1053, MafiaSSK wrote:
Jingle's points are utter shit. Jingle is desperate scum. Why you can't see that? I don't know. Why wouldn't I just push Pants as scum? It was easy there. No. I had a legitimate townread on Pants.
Why and how am I desperate? This makes no sense at all. There has been zero pressure on me since I replaced in. I asked for a stay in lynching so that I could post my reads. I got said stay in lynching. I posted my reads. What part of that is 'desperate scum'? Why are you making shit up?
In post 1073, Titus wrote:Pants, Shroomish was a null lean scum read for me. Jingle using my meta in a bastardized and wrong way (read: full of twists, assumptions and lies), makes me want to jump and say scum. However, I know that burned and butthurt people come into threads assuming I am scum frequently, especially given my winrate as scum. I just buddied the shit out of Jingle in Mini Theme Upick (either 1539 or 49 too lazy to check) and won that flawlessly as a mafia suicide bomber. Although faking that level of indecision was fucking hard. I need time to determine whether Jingle is butthurt town or scum. So I want SSK dead first.
I am bitter over that game. Town derped it up completely. Bitter at you? No. Bitter at all of the fucking stupid that came out of town? Yes. Your alignment this game? Not related.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 1:20 am
by Titus
1) First, going after ika is not a subtle action, particularly for me. Going after ika and being wrong is very likely to get me dead. He and I have a bit of a complicated relationship.
2) Second, when the hell did I tell Anti not to get angry bc I was wrong? That is bullshit.
3) Yes, I tunnel as scum. What's the relevance?
4) I don't remember how many games. The two that stand out are Geology (you were scum) and U pick (I was scum)
5) As scum, I don't bus. You saw it in Upick, where I always had a better place to vote. So SSK is obvious scum so I start the day wanting to killhim? Logical disconnect.
6) You say it was all toen's fault but your actions ibdicate another. I did a jedi mind trick on Trollie that caused his meltdown. I whiteknighted the rber to ensure the math was off and no one solved bus driver. I told you how to solve the game but you ignored it bc I was scum.
My play here is totally different than Upick. I am not in control of anything. I can't get SSK really talked about even though ika wants to lynch him. I haf to kick and scream to get every inch because of my stupid meta barring players from seeing me as a goid townie.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 1:24 am
by Titus
Jingle look at my iso at the start of Day 2.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:38 am
by MafiaSSK
In post 1107, Guyett wrote:
I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
To back that up I checked another game of SC's that I didn't play and the same applies
Guyett, as having comodded with SC before, he would totally have daychat for scum. Not that I can find any examples of it, but I know that he's not adverse to it.
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:12 am
by Titus
What game did you comod with Stranger? By implication, there was no daychat in that game. So why do you think he'd have one here?
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:17 am
by ika
titus, do you think fakevig was scum orientied or town oriented?
think back to our old game. do you think it was some means of that?