Mafiascum.net

KiloDataVocalist

i came out here to have a good time and im honestly feeling so attacked right now

rip

also 9pm what time zone

also

In post 1084, Sephiroth wrote:I feel like UCV lynch is bad but whatever.

he doesnt like it but "whatever" ?
pingy as fuck

In post 1102, sheepsaysmeep wrote:rip

also 9pm what time zone

also

In post 1084, Sephiroth wrote:I feel like UCV lynch is bad but whatever.

he doesnt like it but "whatever" ?
pingy as fuck

9pm GMT Fri,so thats 4pm EST usa?

In post 1088, mozamis wrote:sorry, didnt realise there had been a hammer.
i reckon he will be flip scum.
hopkirk and buj reluctance to get involved with the lynch noted.

Unacceptable if town. I hope I'm right about you being scum.

how is that unacceptable
moz is town

I should really start looking through ISOs.
Calling attention to a fake hammer is sillier than fake hammering in the first place.
Really interesting there's so much support for a policy lynch from Kat/HeM given their alleged scumreads.

it's not policy

Upon looking again, Moz is a solid townread.

In post 101, mozamis wrote:

In post 15, Not_Mafia wrote:Let's put UC on L-1

we want to be a bit careful where UCV is concerned. He can wind some people up because he has strong opinions, and thus canbe lynch baity - he's not a sheep or a pleaser. So yeah, dont just lynch him cos he is different.

In post 109, mozamis wrote:flub vs kat = tvs t

Do you want to lynch UC despite your thoughts?

In post 1082, Katyusha wrote:If he wanted a summary he'd ask for one. He was asking for an explanation of something he read

You're also ignoring the fact he's been online and posting elsewhere the past few days. He's ignoring the game deliberately.

An alternative explination for inactivity is that it has 45 pages in about 4 days.

In post 1107, Katyusha wrote:it's not policy

It's because of inactivity. That's a policy lynch.

He has been online and posting in other games.

He has a past precedent of replacing out of games when they get too fast as town.

Don't provide excuses for him if they're not there - if he has an issue with the game length then he can voice that but he still has shown that he's reading along in his subsequent posts.

DYKDW is a big boy, I'm sure he can defend himself on his own. Especially considering his lynch is for more than just inactivity.

In post 1109, Hopkirk wrote:

In post 1082, Katyusha wrote:If he wanted a summary he'd ask for one. He was asking for an explanation of something he read

You're also ignoring the fact he's been online and posting elsewhere the past few days. He's ignoring the game deliberately.

An alternative explination for inactivity is that it has 45 pages in about 4 days.

In post 1107, Katyusha wrote:it's not policy

It's because of inactivity. That's a policy lynch.

No it isn't

This is de way

Townreads or townleans on everyone except
Kat/Intern/Serg/Bujaber/UC
Going through some stuff

In post 1113, Hopkirk wrote:Townreads or townleans on everyone except
Kat

tell us more

also if you dont have a townread/lean on ucv what are you gaining from defending him here

@Kat: UCV is a null read. I'm arguing against lynching someone who has no AI posts. Pressuring an inactive just isn't useful.
Plus we lynch him and he flips town then tomorrow is the exact same scenario as today.


Intern/Kat/Serg seems plausible.

so what do you think should be done about your null read on UC, then?

In post 1085, mozamis wrote:

In post 1079, Flubbernugget wrote:Has anybody given the thought that the ucv slot hasn't bothered to read the game at all and has no clue there's a wagon on them

can i just clear something up? UCV said could he be replaced with his alt Doyouknow? was that a joke or not?

Oh, I missed this

He flips town, I check for scum in the wagon. If no scum in the wagon, I check for scum trying so hard to disassociate themselves from the wagon when it doesn't make sense to. Like you.

Also, there will be like.. an NK.. so I don't think we're in square one. Do you really think that?

In post 1115, Hopkirk wrote:no AI posts.

Wrong

Really need to work out if Bu is town. If so, votecounts make that team look really plausible. Also no real negative interactions across it.
Going through Bu's stuff now.

In post 1119, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Also, there will be like.. an NK.. so I don't think we're in square one. Do you really think that?

Does anyone in the game scumread Sheep/NM/Rem? It's obvious someone like you/me isn't going to be the nightkill here. There's plenty of targets mafia can easily pick that don't change the conversation.

In post 1118, humaneatingmonkey wrote:He flips town, I check for scum in the wagon. If no scum in the wagon, I check for scum trying so hard to disassociate themselves from the wagon when it doesn't make sense to. Like you.

If he flips town, who's scum on the wagon?

In post 1120, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 1115, Hopkirk wrote:no AI posts.

Wrong

Clarify.

-