Mafiascum.net

In post 1098, Gamma Emerald wrote:What Nero did in this game
Also nice the see you read games you flake out of

In post 1077, Rylai and Lina wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 724, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 639, Rylai and Lina wrote:

In post 196, Nosferatu wrote:did you just say if he was joking

glad to see someone else is not blind.

In post 197, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 185, jjh927 wrote:

In post 93, Randomnamechange wrote:anime gifs are a towntell btw

This is called a joke

Do you speak for random?

I can't even ...

Nancy is NOT a naive player who can't understand jokes. Nancy Knows how to play as town knows how to play as scum. Nearly outlived people as scum by acting this naive recently and I can't allow anyone to give her credit for this attitude.

~Sora

In post 641, Rylai and Lina wrote: No

she does this to look like whatever she looks like after that. she wants to make people underestimate her. It's her thing.

~Sora

Whatever. I could write a wall about how this is wrong and how you don't understand how Nancy plays mafia. You do not understand how Nancy Drew plays mafia if you believe that Nancy intentionally fakes derps to get by as scum (and this is opposed to making major plays, which I believe she did do in Heroes Wanted, but is not the same type here). You do not understand that Nancy Drew just unintentionally does this regardless of her alignment.

In my honest opinion you sound upset that you believe you caught Nancy Drew as scum in Heroes Wanted but could not push it, and want to replicate that performance by scumreading Nancy Drew for doing things that she would've done anyways as town.

It gets pretty clear you're tunnelled on us when you start quoting a whatever post about my read on Kuroi, which is not garbage - in fact I'm still holding onto it and am still surveying Kuroi's subsequent few posts - and is just you being biased. I recommend you lay off and go read a town game of Nancy Drew's like Labyrinth Mafia, because it's pretty clear that you don't know a stitch about how Nancy plays the game and just want to catch her again for your own reasons.

And don't say meta isn't a part of it. Because you don't go and ride any regular slot into the sunset because of supposed "fake derps". You're on our slot because you want to be right.

~Disquieted

My case on your slot and nancy has nothing to do with heroes wanted. my case is about how I see her reactions to people fake when she is talking about

but yeah meta is a part of this and effects the read as if nancy is always like this then it's NAI but what I said about I seeing that as a gambit that she is pulling off to make people townread her in all games is a sirious read based on things she did in this game alone and how she reacted to people who were explaining that to her. or her reactions when she was pushed for it.

and I'm not tunneling her. I'm actually pretty open to vote someone else if they are scummier or to talk about this read or other reads or change my read if I see anything towny from your slot.

~Sora

In post 780, mastina wrote:

In post 607, Rylai and Lina wrote:OK Serious question: when you say if they are not town it will fail do you mean the gladiate will not happen or that the gladiate will happen and you will get lynched

The former. It will fail. And to my knowledge, the mod won't acknowledge it happened at all. There won't be a mod post announcing a lack of successful gladiate; it'll just be as if there never was one, making it indistinguishable between me faking a gladiate claim and me having used the gladiate but it failing due to targeting scum.

The actual role says my action will fail if I target scum, so. I'm presuming failed action when the action is gladiate is identical to failed action when the action is a non-investigative: no acknowledgement in any way whatsoever of it having failed, it just failed.

In post 623, Rylai and Lina wrote:we have a modifier that will help us strongly if someone gladiates us. also why should I have the modifier if the gladiator is town.

Um.

You having that modifier is actually proof of my claim being real?

Like.

You, as town. Having a modifier that helps you when gladiated.
Is evidence corroborating my claim. Of being unable to gladiate anyone except for town.
Because if you are town.
And I am town.
I could only succeed when using it on you.

In post 841, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 735, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 639, Rylai and Lina wrote:Nancy Knows how to play as town knows how to play as scum. Nearly outlived people as scum by acting this naive recently and I can't allow anyone to give her credit for this attitude.

nancy says shit like that regardless of alignment.

FA, take note. This is coming from someone who has played 2 other games with me: Minuet and Hourglass. I strongly advise you to ISO me in those games as well as Necromancer.

In post 967, Gamma Emerald wrote:Being conf’ed would just be a waste for me

In post 483, Innocent Children wrote:Hi.

I'm peeking my head in just to quickly check the state of affairs and to confirm I am still attempting to follow as best I can.

In post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.

Spoiler:

In post 517, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 516, Chickadee wrote:

In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.

No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.

I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?

In post 560, Vecna wrote:

I am the great Cornholio.
Do you have T.P. for my bunghole? I would hate for my holio to get polio.

In post 602, Nero Cain wrote:God this game is terrible

In post 612, Porkens wrote:

In post 607, Rylai and Lina wrote:I'M BACK and reading this finally. gonna start from first page cause last time I read first 6 pages it was really late

In post 48, mastina wrote:I was expecting a troll role when I submitted my picks, and hoh boy did RC not disappoint.

I am Ginngie, Hated Loyal Gladiator

.
Outside of lylo/mylo (which is purely by the numbers, per the role wording), I take one less vote to lynch.
I can gladiate anyone by claiming a guilty on them, but if they're not town-aligned, it'll fail.

I can maybe, MAYBE use this as a conditional cop, IF we can no-lynch after a gladiate (I need to ask RC about this), but if not, yeahhhhh...

OK Serious question: when you say if they are not town it will fail do you mean the gladiate will not happen or that the gladiate will happen and you will get lynched

~Sora

scrum

In post 616, Skygazer wrote:Yes because replying with a single letter is the same as reading 20 pages and performing critical thinking

In post 632, Porkens wrote:I'm too tired to follow this

In post 673, Rylai and Lina wrote:

In post 295, Innocent Children wrote:well now that's all over

i don't like how kuroi popped in with a fairly structured post and ignored all of what just happened

that's my one independent read, i'm done for the day bye

~dis

That is a really bad read

~Sora

In post 700, Wh4t wrote:Is it bad that I want to vote IC for his nonsensical walls?

In post 749, Randomnamechange wrote:VOTE: porkens
weak questioning, overconfident scumreads not backed up my a vote at any point this game