Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:37 am
also vedith cut out some of the roleplay and be serious. I get ur having fun but I am done with u using roleplay to hide what your thinking.
you're just now figuring this out?In post 1007, Ankamius wrote:If that's your description of my ISO this game, you're not going to listen.
your guess is as good as mineIn post 1021, DoubtingThomas wrote:why did uh they already become pairs? i didnt even come into the thread yet it's been like 2 days max lol
In post 1075, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:You’re saying scum never townreads their scumbuddies?Obviously, only two of you can be scum here, max.
if NAN had read DR WORM"S ISO for truth before saying WORM is scum NAN would realise how WORM town read both other players in NAN"S SCUMLIST!!In post 1082, Dr Worm wrote: WHY 2MAX?? it"s NOT OBVIOUSLY TO DR WORM why NANY??
How did you get anything concrete out of his isoIn post 1099, Allomancer wrote:dr worm is def scum here
Son why the fuck did you accept his offer, then?In post 1098, Firebringer wrote:hey vedith, I am going to leave ur ass at the start of tomorrow if u don't get ur act together.
you disgust meIn post 1063, DoubtingThomas wrote:lol DR WORM is kinda funny
pls do. vedith and worm are both either scum or policy lynches that really need to happen for us to have any hope of understanding what's going onIn post 1098, Firebringer wrote:hey vedith, I am going to leave ur ass at the start of tomorrow if u don't get ur act together.
Amen! pls do thisIn post 1103, Dr Worm wrote:I WILL TRY TO DO THIS WITHOUT CAPS BECAUSE I WANT YOU TO KNOW I"M SIRIOUS!!
rip "without caps"In post 1075, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:You’re saying scum never townreads their scumbuddies?Obviously, only two of you can be scum here, max.if NAN had read DR WORM"S ISO for truth before saying WORM is scum NAN would realise how WORM town read both other players in NAN"S SCUMLIST!!In post 1082, Dr Worm wrote: WHY 2MAX?? it"s NOT OBVIOUSLY TO DR WORM why NANY??
why didn't NAN say only two of "Fire Worm Allo" could be scum when NAN first posted scum-list in post 969??
why now "OBVIOUS" that only two of Fire, Worm, Allo "can be scum"??
See this is lazy. If you want to push for policy lynches fine but you can’t honestly tell me you’re getting anything alignment indicative out of worm’s postingIn post 1111, Allomancer wrote:pls do. vedith and worm are both either scum or policy lynches that really need to happen for us to have any hope of understanding what's going onIn post 1098, Firebringer wrote:hey vedith, I am going to leave ur ass at the start of tomorrow if u don't get ur act together.
I am an intense person mr taly. Ask anyone in my family.In post 1108, Taly wrote:His intensity seems very hard to fake as scum, and more along his personality.
I actually am too.Firebringer wrote:I am an intense person mr taly. Ask anyone in my family.In post 1108, Taly wrote:His intensity seems very hard to fake as scum, and more along his personality.
+1In post 1110, Firebringer wrote:drworm is a copy of Kain Tepes I can't believe no one remembers tepes this is like exactly the same trolling. Just ignore every post he makes.
The reads are bad because they are dumb reads, not because they have dumb reasoning. I couldn't care less about the reasoning. Also if you expect me to explain my reads you're in for a long game.In post 1108, Taly wrote:It's funny that you say Pink's reads are incredibly bad... yet you haven't really elaborated much on yours since 159
Oh I'm sorry. I didn't realize we can't post reads and comment on other conversations. I was under the impression this thread was for the benefit of the entire town, but I guess I was wrong.Also; I don't know why you're injecting yourself into my question toward Dr. Worm in 740 when I posed a question to him about his reads.
I don't really know how to sort him; now that you say this, I'll go check his ISO again and form a read. Also 740 was quite a bit ago.But since you want to talk about yours, how about you go in depth on your Krazy null-read? He's been very active, so I don't know why you're on the fence with him.
314 was toward Nancy, not me. According to your own logic I shouldn't be inserting myself there. I'll go check 726 again, I must've missed it originally. We are all human.One final thing... My questions and assessments in 726 and 314 were not rhetorical... While you have 'replied' to them, I don't think you've really addressed any of their points.
I'm still not convinced I want a partner at all tbhIn post 1105, Allomancer wrote:read on ank is changing, may want to pair with her again