Mafiascum.net

In post 1097, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1092, Flubbernugget wrote:What pinged you?

Other than the L-1, at this point just a gut read. That’s why I’m asking and not voting.

"I want to know if other people will push this wagon with me because I'm scum and care more about being liked than I do actually scumhunting"

In post 1094, Flubbernugget wrote:If you're doing ISOs i would ask you to ISO me and urap 2 next

I did. I want to know why Ankimius is voting you.

Rn, I think she and Enter despite his wrong vote are town.

In post 1096, Enter wrote:

In post 1089, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1082, Enter wrote:

In post 1080, Nimueh wrote:@Enter, any particular reason, you ignored this post?

I didn't, you posted that after anything I've posted today.

So, you’re here now. Do you tr Rec? He put NMSA at L-1.

Yes, and yes..

496 and it's following two posts read as town to me. The only excuse I could find for his LaL push would be if he was trying to redirect wagon off NMSA, and conserving he put NMSA at L-1 that seems highly unlikely

It's more than two. It's that post chain that reads as town frustration.

In post 1101, Nimueh wrote:I want to know why Ankimius is voting you.

You and everyone else lmao

Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

In post 1099, Enter wrote:

In post 1095, Nimueh wrote:How is it not obvious to you? Are you deliberately being dense here?

"I don't like other people voting me, so they shouldn't vote me. I don't want to call people scummy - if their reasoning for voting me doesn’t ping me as scummy, because I'm town and I don't gaf about the extra attention, and in addition, I don't want to answer people's questions about my justifiableable behavior so I'm going to call people WRONG instead."

Tell me why Tris vote on you was good before I answer for you.

FIFY

It obviously wasn’t, which is why I voted her.

But she didn’t keep it on me for those reasons I didn’t tr, so I unvoted her.

hi

In post 1103, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1101, Nimueh wrote:I want to know why Ankimius is voting you.

You and everyone else lmao

I haven’t voted you and I’m not currently voting anyone.

I'm sorry if I find it hard to believe that coming in the game thread after like five days of not posting (and before that posting almost nothing at all) and telling people to take their vote off you because you don't feel well is justifiable in any sense of the word.

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

Get back to me, when you’ve actually read my posts. Thanks.

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

You're harping on someone that just got into the game before they can get a full grasp of it, and it's a bad look.

What about you, do you think urap is scumhunting too?

In post 1093, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1090, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1086, Flubbernugget wrote:Why are you asking about reck specifically?

Because he’s pinging me. I am not fully caught up but I read his ISO after he put NMSA at L-1.

go on, use your big adult words to tell the class what is pinging you

Most of your time for activity is on the weekends right? Is this really all that got your attention?

In post 1108, Enter wrote:I'm sorry if I find it hard to believe that coming in the game thread after like five days of not posting (and before that posting almost nothing at all) and telling people to take their vote off you because you don't feel well is justifiable in any sense of the word.

Are you going to keep misrepping me, because it’s starting to get annoying.

At least have the decency to direct quote me because you’re clearly not reading what I said.

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but

if this is your sole reason for for voting me

,it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris

@Enter, READ!

In post 1098, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1093, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1090, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1086, Flubbernugget wrote:Why are you asking about reck specifically?

Because he’s pinging me. I am not fully caught up but I read his ISO after he put NMSA at L-1.

go on, use your big adult words to tell the class what is pinging you

Not really helping.

cool, so like, just to check, you have no intentions of explaining reads?

In post 1114, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1098, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1093, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1090, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1086, Flubbernugget wrote:Why are you asking about reck specifically?

Because he’s pinging me. I am not fully caught up but I read his ISO after he put NMSA at L-1.

go on, use your big adult words to tell the class what is pinging you

Not really helping.

cool, so like, just to check, you have no intentions of explaining reads?

I said, other then the L-1 thing it’s a weak gut read, which was why I was asking. It has zilch to do with intention.

cool

just saying it's page 45 of a game youve been mostly absent for so i dont think weak gut reads are gonna impress anyone at this point

In post 1109, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

Get back to me, when you’ve actually read my posts. Thanks.

Would you mind specifying what I haven't read instead of saying that I didn't? Oh, you can't, because I have read and you have no excuse for the crap you've been posting.

In post 1110, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

You're harping on someone that just got into the game before they can get a full grasp of it, and it's a bad look.

What about you, do you think urap is scumhunting too?

Why do you object to my Nimueh push but you didn't object to the tictac votes? Nimueh is in the game thread posting scummy things and tictac isn't here at all and hasn't been for several days. How do you justify not being here most of the week with exemption from presure?

In post 1112, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1108, Enter wrote:I'm sorry if I find it hard to believe that coming in the game thread after like five days of not posting (and before that posting almost nothing at all) and telling people to take their vote off you because you don't feel well is justifiable in any sense of the word.

Are you going to keep misrepping me, because it’s starting to get annoying.

At least have the decency to direct quote me because you’re clearly not reading what I said.

Quote me where I misrep you.

In post 1113, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but

if this is your sole reason for for voting me

,it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris

@Enter, READ!

I didn't know it was possible to take yourself out of context until just now.

In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.

In post 1074, Enter wrote:VOTE: nimueh

Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.

In post 1071, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1068, Enter wrote:

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but if this is your sole reason for for voting me, it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris

I disagree pretty strongly, actually.

If she had stayed on me for that reason, I’d be right.

In post 1105, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1099, Enter wrote:

In post 1095, Nimueh wrote:How is it not obvious to you? Are you deliberately being dense here?

"I don't like other people voting me, so they shouldn't vote me. I don't want to call people scummy - if their reasoning for voting me doesn’t ping me as scummy, because I'm town and I don't gaf about the extra attention, and in addition, I don't want to answer people's questions about my justifiableable behavior so I'm going to call people WRONG instead."

Tell me why Tris vote on you was good before I answer for you.

FIFY

It obviously wasn’t, which is why I voted her.

But she didn’t keep it on me for those reasons I didn’t tr, so I unvoted her.

Huh, it's almost like I was right in what I said earlier. Weird.

In post 1117, Enter wrote:

In post 1109, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

Get back to me, when you’ve actually read my posts. Thanks.

Would you mind specifying what I haven't read instead of saying that I didn't? Oh, you can't, because I have read and you have no excuse for the crap you've been posting.

In post 1110, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.


You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.

You're harping on someone that just got into the game before they can get a full grasp of it, and it's a bad look.

What about you, do you think urap is scumhunting too?

Why do you object to my Nimueh push but you didn't object to the tictac votes? Nimueh is in the game thread posting scummy things and tictac isn't here at all and hasn't been for several days. How do you justify not being here most of the week with exemption from presure?

In post 1112, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1108, Enter wrote:I'm sorry if I find it hard to believe that coming in the game thread after like five days of not posting (and before that posting almost nothing at all) and telling people to take their vote off you because you don't feel well is justifiable in any sense of the word.

Are you going to keep misrepping me, because it’s starting to get annoying.

At least have the decency to direct quote me because you’re clearly not reading what I said.

Quote me where I misrep you.

In post 1113, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but

if this is your sole reason for for voting me

,it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris

@Enter, READ!

I didn't know it was possible to take yourself out of context until just now.

If you’re going to keep ignoring what I’m saying, I won’t waste my time responding to you.

In post 1119, Nimueh wrote:If you’re going to keep ignoring what I’m saying, I won’t waste my time responding to you.

I'm responding directly to what you're saying and using quotes to back it up. The irony here is that you're misrepping my case on you and then arguing against that instead of actually arguing my case on you, all while accusing me of misrepping you.

Instead of saying things as they are (when they're not) please quote yourself (and not out of context) because this is getting ridiculous. Maybe when you go back and look at what's happening you'll recognize that feeling bad is not a viable reason to be exempt from scummy play and that you're saying a bunch of words that aren't true and that you'd have an awful hard time backing up with posts.

In post 1120, Enter wrote:

In post 1119, Nimueh wrote:If you’re going to keep ignoring what I’m saying, I won’t waste my time responding to you.

I'm responding directly to what you're saying and using quotes to back it up. The irony here is that you're misrepping my case on you and then arguing against that instead of actually arguing my case on you, all while accusing me of misrepping you.

You said that I’m sr votes on me for being unwell and when I prove that is bs, you persist on disregarding it.

In post 1117, Enter wrote:Why do you object to my Nimueh push but you didn't object to the tictac votes? Nimueh is in the game thread posting scummy things and tictac isn't here at all and hasn't been for several days. How do you justify not being here most of the week with exemption from presure?

I literally...LITERALLY just said people need to stop sitting on wagons with no cases. Maybe if you stopped spam posting every chance you got and actually READ something once, there wouldn't be constant bouts of inactivity that are partially the work of an apathy you keep causing?

In post 1122, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1120, Enter wrote:

In post 1119, Nimueh wrote:If you’re going to keep ignoring what I’m saying, I won’t waste my time responding to you.

I'm responding directly to what you're saying and using quotes to back it up. The irony here is that you're misrepping my case on you and then arguing against that instead of actually arguing my case on you, all while accusing me of misrepping you.

You said that I’m sr votes on me for being unwell and when I prove that is bs, you persist on disregarding it.

No, I'm not. I'm saying you seem to think the votes on you are BAD (not sr). Please READ.