If DEB is scum, he is a legit doc enabler OR someone actively coached him on what to claim.
If DEB is town, which is by far the more likely outcome, he is legit a town doc enabler.
...............................................................In post 1112, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re also using every generic FL discredit technique in the game.
But why would scum no kill just to discredit DEB? I don’t see how that serves their scum wincon?In post 1115, Flavor Leaf wrote:That’s LITERALLY the MAIN point I’m bringing up.
I disagree you were the intended night kill because that implies Dann’s doctor shot worked, when I am damn near sure that it didn’t because DEB doesnt make that claim up.
Why did you ask this? We didn’t see any reason for Dann to fullclaim.In post 1032, Binary Star wrote:You would have to full claim what you have before I can take a "soft innocent" seriously, and you should probably do so given how much you've already said.
-B
Do you think there’s more than one doc enabler? FL seems beyond convinced DEB wasn’t lying. What I can’t wrap my head around, is why would scum no kill just to discredit a dead player?In post 1117, Arkham Asylum wrote:Some of the things you are saying are probably right. But your conclusion is wrong. And explaining the thing you are wrong about is bad for town. Our heads don't all agree on whether deb was town or scum and I don't think today's flip should be overdetermined from our guess of his alignment or the veracity of his claim.
Take a look at chicka. If you think deb was town, what do you think of chicka's attitude toward deb?
-Kat