Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 7:15 am
I am not that confident on profii, but I am more confident in Looker being scum here.
When I'm investigating someone or making a case, I pursue it in full even if I don't feel confident behind the scenes. This helps me to get better reads on the player and those around them. Often times I'll start town reading someone almost immediately into my questioning, but maintain the poker face so I can continue to get authentic reads off them (such was the case with my Luca questioning who came off as town to me pretty much right away, and my Chara push who I was leaning town on pretty much after your back and forth. In cases like these I'm looking to confirm my stance and clear up any discrepancies). There are also times when I speak matter of factly as a rhetorical technique to help get my point across (such was the case when I gave you my perspective on Egixs profii read). Generally though I'm never fully confident in my reads and always reevaluate behind the scene.In post 1068, insomnia wrote:Making the case isn't scummy, having the confidence you have on it I think was what he was trying to point out was scummy. If you believe you're rarely right on something, why would you display such confidence?
To be clear, you're also asking why I ignored you saying I was "confirmed" to you?In post 1101, Ame wrote:When I'm SURE sure on something I'll make it explicit with key words such as "confident," "confirmed," and "locked."
In post 223, Ame wrote:@Chara
In post 206, Chara wrote:
Looker wearing his heart on his sleeve (along with his process) is interesting. i kind of like it.
(1) What in Looker's post above are you referencing as wearing their heart on their sleeve? (2) Have you played with Looker before?
Really, if you ctrl + f "Looker" in Ame's ISO, this is the only post where she gives an actual stance on him. And it's already pre-planning a bus, even though there was no previous consideration. Seems weird. Keep in mind, this is also before OS outed the mechanical aspect of the read. So this read really came out of thin air.In post 744, Ame wrote:Looker actually is a viable option. I'll change my back up to her. She can only be scum with you or Egix though, so the best play is all to lynch you vig Egix.In post 717, ObviousScum wrote:Why are Looker and ELA cleared?
Insomnia led the lynch on Aaron. EV threw shade at a concensus town read for voting Aaron and so is pseudo confirmed to me.
You said "Good game!"In post 1101, Ame wrote:When I'm investigating someone or making a case, I pursue it in full even if I don't feel confident behind the scenes. This helps me to get better reads on the player and those around them. Often times I'll start town reading someone almost immediately into my questioning, but maintain the poker face so I can continue to get authentic reads off them (such was the case with my Luca questioning who came off as town to me pretty much right away, and my Chara push who I was leaning town on pretty much after your back and forth. In cases like these I'm looking to confirm my stance and clear up any discrepancies). There are also times when I speak matter of factly as a rhetorical technique to help get my point across (such was the case when I gave you my perspective on Egixs profii read). Generally though I'm never fully confident in my reads and always reevaluate behind the scene.In post 1068, insomnia wrote:Making the case isn't scummy, having the confidence you have on it I think was what he was trying to point out was scummy. If you believe you're rarely right on something, why would you display such confidence?
Regarding the JTB-Egix case, however, I genuinely was just confident haha. But it wasn't my intention to make people think I was right? I wanted to know what people thought.
When I'm SURE sure on something I'll make it explicit with key words such as "confident," "confirmed," and "locked."
In post 1109, Ame wrote:I thought the game was in the bag!
I look at this slightly differently to youIn post 1002, Ame wrote:There's three things I'd like your opinion on specifically:In post 784, Ame wrote:The case here viewtopic.php?p=11531677#p11531677In post 783, profii wrote:which bit are you interested in feedback onIn post 781, Ame wrote:Points*
1. The JTB/Egix/Aaron case I made here.
2. Egix having a solid town read on you yesterday. My view is that it was unwarranted and he was coming from a place of TMI.
3. His going after Al for apparently attempting to role fish Looker, but doing so in a way that actually brought attention to Looker. #249, 266, 343, 371
I'm not a fan on activity based alignment spec sorryIn post 1004, Wimpy wrote:@profli - Macabre was also hiding his statue and intentionally lurking. Right after I call him out for it he posts within 20 minutes and his log in status still said Saturday. Imo town doesn’t do that.
It really is birdman and Bart now OS.
I’m pretty confident in that solve.
Also this, I forgot to mention it. Nice call out.In post 1114, Luca Blight wrote:3) throws random shade at EV, when Looker has been as much a bystander this game.
Can you even name a single protown thing he’s done? I doubt itIn post 1113, profii wrote:I'm not a fan on activity based alignment spec sorryIn post 1004, Wimpy wrote:@profli - Macabre was also hiding his statue and intentionally lurking. Right after I call him out for it he posts within 20 minutes and his log in status still said Saturday. Imo town doesn’t do that.
It really is birdman and Bart now OS.
I’m pretty confident in that solve.
Help me with looker - I have just been in a couple of games with him rolling scum so far I'm a bit biased by his activity levels but I'm trying to ignore that and say that's just what you get from himIn post 1100, insomnia wrote:I am not that confident on profii, but I am more confident in Looker being scum here.
Do you think you can name more anti town things than I can name pro town?In post 1116, Wimpy wrote:Can you even name a single protown thing he’s done? I doubt itIn post 1113, profii wrote:I'm not a fan on activity based alignment spec sorryIn post 1004, Wimpy wrote:@profli - Macabre was also hiding his statue and intentionally lurking. Right after I call him out for it he posts within 20 minutes and his log in status still said Saturday. Imo town doesn’t do that.
It really is birdman and Bart now OS.
I’m pretty confident in that solve.
I posted a big case that goes into some of the posts, also, Luca made a good point about the comment on EVL.In post 1117, profii wrote:Help me with looker - I have just been in a couple of games with him rolling scum so far I'm a bit biased by his activity levels but I'm trying to ignore that and say that's just what you get from himIn post 1100, insomnia wrote:I am not that confident on profii, but I am more confident in Looker being scum here.
I can name 82. What you got?In post 1119, profii wrote:Do you think you can name more anti town things than I can name pro town?In post 1116, Wimpy wrote:Can you even name a single protown thing he’s done? I doubt itIn post 1113, profii wrote:I'm not a fan on activity based alignment spec sorryIn post 1004, Wimpy wrote:@profli - Macabre was also hiding his statue and intentionally lurking. Right after I call him out for it he posts within 20 minutes and his log in status still said Saturday. Imo town doesn’t do that.
It really is birdman and Bart now OS.
I’m pretty confident in that solve.
I’m pushing my scum reads homie. How is that anti town?In post 1118, insomnia wrote:Wimpy you're being massively anti-town. Please comment on the subject of Looker / Ame and stop unhealthy tunnels, the crow is spewed and the epitome of towniness.
In post 1118, insomnia wrote:Wimpy you're being massively anti-town. Please comment on the subject of Looker / Ame and stop unhealthy tunnels, the crow is spewed and the epitome of towniness.