Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 5:54 am
What?In post 1081, Titus wrote:That's not mafiaIn post 1047, Bypasser Catcher wrote:Voting people for being annoying is an easy way to obfuscate not actually scumhunting and is extremely anti-town
What?In post 1081, Titus wrote:That's not mafiaIn post 1047, Bypasser Catcher wrote:Voting people for being annoying is an easy way to obfuscate not actually scumhunting and is extremely anti-town
You're not exhibiting that playstyle hereIn post 1096, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I tend to be scumread as town a lot by players because of my playstyle just saying.
Is there anything you think is scummy about me that's not just playstyle choice Andresvmb?
It’s clever that you’re dismissing the concerns I have laid out as “playstyle choices”. I’m not going to engage on this point - you are very obviously oversimplifying my perspective.In post 1096, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I tend to be scumread as town a lot by players because of my playstyle just saying.
Is there anything you think is scummy about me that's not just playstyle choice Andresvmb?
Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
PrimeFighter is the slot you replaced into. They never posted.In post 1103, quiet wrote:Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
They’re here right now, and more scummy to me than plus atm.
VOTE: Hayker
I personally still feel comfortable with NM today, but that’s strictly holding the line the fact that I know I won’t be able to read NM and thought cheeky was scummy.
But I liked my nickname. PrimeFighter. It’s probably an insult that I don’t understand but it was nice anyway.
Uh oh now I have to redo my readslistIn post 1104, Andresvmb wrote:PrimeFighter is the slot you replaced into. They never posted.In post 1103, quiet wrote:Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
They’re here right now, and more scummy to me than plus atm.
VOTE: Hayker
I personally still feel comfortable with NM today, but that’s strictly holding the line the fact that I know I won’t be able to read NM and thought cheeky was scummy.
But I liked my nickname. PrimeFighter. It’s probably an insult that I don’t understand but it was nice anyway.
etymonline.org wrote:-ment
common suffix of Latin origin forming nouns, originally from French and representing Latin-mentum, which was added to verb stems to make nouns indicating the result or product of the action of the verb or the means or instrument of the action. In Vulgar Latin and Old French it came to be used as a formative in nouns of action. French inserts an-e-between the verbal root and the suffix (as incommenc-e-mentfromcommenc-er; with verbs inir,-i-is inserted instead (as insent-i-mentfromsentir).
Used with English verb stems from 16c. (for example , , , the last of which also illustrates the habit of turning-yto-i-before this suffix).
The stems to which-mentis normally appended are those of verbs; freaks likeoddment&funnimentshould not be made a precedent of; they are themselves due to misconception ofmerriment, which is not from the adjective, but from an obsolete verbmerryto rejoice. [Fowler]
Also i'm not sure i understand this.In post 1106, Not_Mafia wrote:Uh oh now I have to redo my readslistIn post 1104, Andresvmb wrote:PrimeFighter is the slot you replaced into. They never posted.In post 1103, quiet wrote:Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
They’re here right now, and more scummy to me than plus atm.
VOTE: Hayker
I personally still feel comfortable with NM today, but that’s strictly holding the line the fact that I know I won’t be able to read NM and thought cheeky was scummy.
But I liked my nickname. PrimeFighter. It’s probably an insult that I don’t understand but it was nice anyway.
I said a name wrongIn post 1110, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'm not sure i understand this.In post 1106, Not_Mafia wrote:Uh oh now I have to redo my readslistIn post 1104, Andresvmb wrote:PrimeFighter is the slot you replaced into. They never posted.In post 1103, quiet wrote:Could we do Hawker instead?In post 1060, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:
Can we at least consolidate onto the PlusJOYED wagon to breathe some life back into this day? It feels atm like we're going through the motions and Not_Mafia's elim is inevitable.
Fair enough to me. I've got PlusJoyed/Not_Mafia/Hayker all in my PoE and could switch my vote to any if there is desire for it.
They’re here right now, and more scummy to me than plus atm.
VOTE: Hayker
I personally still feel comfortable with NM today, but that’s strictly holding the line the fact that I know I won’t be able to read NM and thought cheeky was scummy.
But I liked my nickname. PrimeFighter. It’s probably an insult that I don’t understand but it was nice anyway.
No I miss it put it back.In post 1108, Not_Mafia wrote:quiet
Hard luck broseph
Why do you scumread haykerIn post 1113, quiet wrote:No I miss it put it back.In post 1108, Not_Mafia wrote:quiet
Bypasser, do you disagree on Hayker? Or at least putting pressure on that slot? Or do I just generally scumping like crazy for you.
Since they’ve gone back they’ve come for NM and Norwegian in relatively low-effort ways. I scumread the slot before they got back, and am on board with (I think Andres) sentiment that I’m comfortable waiting till plus gets back before putting pressure there. Why not push here?
Really didn't like this read, especially in context of 100 posts after first two posts with nothing else said/done.In post 126, Hayker wrote:vote:Andres
Originally I misread Andres post a bit and was going to point out I consider it a scum tell to insist onesself is town, but Andres didn't quite do that. Even so it feels very offputting. The cockyness of " oh I wont react.
In post 250, Hayker wrote:In post 213, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 195, Rannygazoo wrote:
NPOM is unreadable. If any investigative role out there wants to check them tonight, don’t let me stop you.
Are you crumbing RB?
Are you role fishing?
I thought this was mostly shade throwing.In post 305, Hayker wrote:Loggint this aa a tell/slip. Specifically the last time I rolled scum. Not enough on its own though, espwcially since I see two ways to read this message. But last time I rolled scum. I once used wording like this and was called for it on another site
But now these two back to back:In post 498, Hayker wrote:Oddly enough the more DGB posts the less I scumread them
In post 541, Hayker wrote:I don't know how I missed this before. Probably trying to play these games with just my phone. You fake claimed miller? Was this move just for discussion purposes? This does not feel townie at all to me. Miller can cause a lot of chaos and confusion to the town, and fake claiming it at that.
Heybbmolla
BBmolla
Same bad vote for basically the same bad reasons. These are the world's easiest outs. And then goes after Norwigian when there is pushback against the timing of the NM vote. I just don't see this as trying to solve the game. I would rather push for more detail here right now.In post 1027, Hayker wrote:What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.
vote:not_mafia
Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?
Of everything in the thread, that's what we focus on? Of everything Norwegian has posted, that's the scumping? And why are we targeting Norwegian here after being gone from the thread for a while? It seems off to me.In post 1072, Hayker wrote:I strongly dislike posts like this. "everything I said is useful" Just insisting that ones own play is good. Never a good thing to see.
He can be a good player. But the slot as a whole? Not_Mafia put the nail in the coffin.In post 1091, Bypasser Catcher wrote:not mafia isnt a bad player he just makes trolly mechanical choices lol
He's obvscum and for some reasonIn post 1109, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is going on with ur reads NM.
Put their slit aside? WhhhhyyyyyyyyyIn post 1112, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: PlusJoyed
Idk wtf NM is doing so i'll put their slot aside for a bit and support Luca with this wagon.
Ok ngl i like this.In post 1117, quiet wrote:Don't know how to multiqoute, but Bypasser, what do you think the point of Hayker chiming in on your one-line back and forth with Norwigian was? Like why jump on that interaction?
I read the interaction like this
Bypasser: Gives reads, says didn't read full thread
Norwigian: Says reads are bad, says go read thread and be better
Bypasser: Got something useful to say?
Norwigian: Did I stutter? Calling your reads bad was useful (and/or i've been useful, what have you been doing)?
Either way, interesting back and forth.
Hayker clipped the last line "Everything is useful", and shaded it like this:Of everything in the thread, that's what we focus on? Of everything Norwegian has posted, that's the scumping? And why are we targeting Norwegian here after being gone from the thread for a while? It seems off to me.In post 1072, Hayker wrote:I strongly dislike posts like this. "everything I said is useful" Just insisting that ones own play is good. Never a good thing to see.