Mafiascum.net

In post 1094, Marky Mark wrote:

In post 1046, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1015, Marky Mark wrote:Correction - Dunn was #6 slot on Kitty wagon. Clearly, I can't count. The general logic still stands, although this does downgrade that element of their scumminess to an extent.

I was told to move my vote off of save the dragons.

I feel like town here argues why their vote was a good vote, rather than sloping the accountability with "I was told to move my vote", which says nothing about why they moved it

OK.

I was the only person voting Save The Dragons, Kitty was at 5 votes, Cabd was at 6 votes. I preferred Kitty over Cabd, and my vote wasn't doing anything.

In post 1098, Vasex wrote:

In post 1083, Dunnstral wrote:Then we kill him and see if he's a real cop with a real result, or scum

Well ok, we lose not much, if kitty a real cop and we hang him tomorrow. Knowing his check elimation of him is like killing a simple townie. If he is real one-shot cop.
But will we hang him tomorrow if he is alive?
There will be less people to hang him...
There can be scum check of smb else...
Well, if kitty is real mafia, we chose a very difficult way

If they claim a guilty check it's probably best to eliminate them first still, yes

Regarding Kitty. He is 1-Shot Cop.

Let him check, and listen to check. After kill him. If he checked mafia, then gg, we kill mafia next. If he checked townie, then we know who to protect. If Kitty is not Cop, then, well, he still die. There's no need to haste.

VOTE: T3

whats the case on T3?

He claimed 1-Shot Bulletproof, which is common for traitors.

And why do we think there is a traitor?

Well, he may be also be Serial Killer or Townie with Bulletproof (which is unlikely). I doubt SK idiocy in claiming bulletproof for sake of that. So he could be traitor.

whats makes it unlikely that he's a town bp?

If t3 is traitor, this claim can be a signal to mafia.
But im not sure and i dont get it about many moments in roles and there is too much random and fake-claiming can be in this game...
I dont know, i dont feel bad about T3.
Maybe if Enchant is townie, i will think, that t3 is mafia...
But not sure...

Town doesh't claim Bulletproof, because it makes sure they will be not targeted, wasting role.

could enchant just be scum here? like this whole "he's a claimed bp, git him!" like there's a lot of scum motivation in wanting to get a bp out of the way. And the "he's unlikely to be town bp!" is just kinda slimy. Also I don't have to be on a wagon with DGB and Andre!

VOTE: enchant

As mafia, i have zero motivation to remove bp, because he could be traitor.

In post 1109, Enchant wrote:because it makes sure they will be not targeted, wasting role.

so is he scum for wasting his role or scum b/c he claimed bp? I mean there is a difference between those 2 arguments. like I 100% agree that he wasted his role but voting him for that just seems a bit silly, no?

I don't get the traitor talk unless u r scum that knows there is one or just kinda pushing this idea of a phantom role, either way i think its kinda scummy.

In post 1112, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1109, Enchant wrote:because it makes sure they will be not targeted, wasting role.

so is he scum for wasting his role or scum b/c he claimed bp? I mean there is a difference between those 2 arguments. like I 100% agree that he wasted his role but voting him for that just seems a bit silly, no?

Town Bulletproof would never claim he is Bulletproof, because it wastes role utility.

ESPECIALLY when he not even getting voted.

there's been a decent amount of pressure on T3 all day. IDK if there we any votes on him and the time of his claim but I'm fairly certain he'd had been getting voted.

Like, I agree with u that if t3 is a town bp he's a dunce but my problem is that when I asked what the case on him was you said it was b/c he claimed a role that was common for a scum role which is sorta as a push. You then followed it up by claiming that he's fake claiming bp b/c town wouldn't claim bp and waste thier role wich makes a lil' sense but im not sure why you didn't lead with that and the change in reasoning kinda makes me worry.

In post 1111, Enchant wrote:As mafia, i have zero motivation to remove bp, because he could be traitor.

but if ur scum on a 5 man team then you know there's no traitor and you could safely make this argument.

In post 1087, Vasex wrote:To give Kitty one more night? Till the end of the game?

i mean no. I'm just saying that the reward of giving kitty a night to use the investigation outweighs the risk of lynching a 1x cop. I'm ok with getting kitty tomorrow but there's like no point in doing this today.

I feel Enchant is a scum. Oh yeah

T3 is townie or some pr, Nero is townie
We should elim Enchant today
Lets do that

In post 1110, Nero Cain wrote:could enchant just be scum here? like this whole "he's a claimed bp, git him!" like there's a lot of scum motivation in wanting to get a bp out of the way. And the "he's unlikely to be town bp!" is just kinda slimy. Also I don't have to be on a wagon with DGB and Andre!

VOTE: enchant

but it is not enchant, who started this. It was Windows & myself.

In post 12, Artemiana wrote:Ego bed time for young goddess

In post 526, Artemiana wrote:I forgot my account password guys

Much embarrass, I'm here now though!

In post 527, Artemiana wrote:So guys.

How bout we pretend I'm a rep in and tell me what's happened so far?

In post 549, Artemiana wrote:I might as well give up with this account at this point

In post 552, Artemiana wrote:I fail to see how that makes Andres scum and not town defending slots.

Also guys miller is not a normal role

In post 554, Artemiana wrote:Definitely not defending slots

In post 556, Artemiana wrote:Vibes so far, I don't like pushes so far.

Nero lock town. All pushes there needs to stop

Marky, etine, vasex, ???, ???

Have fun with this hero solve

In post 558, Artemiana wrote:Zoomer?

I'm old af

VOTE: Artemiana

Can we decide whenever we leash Kitty or not? I think that we are near the end of this day.

It seems that not today
Vote Enchant