Mafiascum.net

I can't believe the words coming out of my keyboard but this is by far the most tolerable & limited posting mastina has made in awhile and the idea she has to go for gamehealth is nonsense

Oh some info for people?

I am a silo. I also picked 3 choices before silo. I knew I would get Silo because I told Cakez I was purposefully waiting until the last minute to submit so I would lose all tiebreaks.

I know 3 roles that are guaranteed in this game and its interesting.

all the roles were already guaranteed to begin with?

In post 1100, Prism wrote:I can't believe the words coming out of my keyboard but this is by far the most tolerable & limited posting mastina has made in awhile and the idea she has to go for gamehealth is nonsense

Yawn.

She does the same thing every game. And now we are cutting it off before she can get into the groove in a game where deacon 5 and 4 are mostly memes and you are like

SHE IS SO RESERVED COMPARED TO NORMAL GUYS COME ON

yeah we have only been actually playing for like 3 hours or sommat.

Not if no one chooses a troop

Can you explain for me why this is the case in this game but not in WH13?

Or did some of you fuckers put literally EVERY ROLE IN ORDER instead of getting a silo

there's 21 players, 13 roles, and most roles are just better for town than a silo, so even mafia would covet them

I guess it's possible something like radar wouldn't get picked but still, holding out to be 100% sure certain roles are present seems more of a paranoid mafia mindset

In post 1106, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Or did some of you fuckers put literally EVERY ROLE IN ORDER instead of getting a silo

IN MY DEFENSE I THOUGHT THIS IS WHAT WE HAD TO DO AND THE SLOWEST PEOPLE GOT SILO. I WAS QUITE SLOW.

i used randomizer.com i was stressed

In post 1105, Prism wrote:Can you explain for me why this is the case in this game but not in WH13?

Yep it's called WH13 was also a slog where any Mastina post was awful but at least I was a mason while I was alive in that one so I had town control to override her bullshit.

It's called "I have put up with Mastina in games without removing her for years now and it has only caused suffering so I'm not doing it again."

Why does me doing it here and not WH13 mean jack? I also didn't do it in about 20 other games of varying alignments.

I'm tired of seeing her posts. She has scum equity this game. It's win win

also i found out how to iso, im a quick study

In post 1107, samantha97 wrote:there's 21 players, 13 roles, and most roles are just better for town than a silo, so even mafia would covet them

I guess it's possible something like radar wouldn't get picked but still, holding out to be 100% sure certain roles are present seems more of a paranoid mafia mindset

No townie in their right fucking mind should have picked a number of roles like Fail Safe and Fallout Shelter over a silo.

I'm so upset lol

maybe i'm missing meta here but why mastina of all people, i'm looking at her iso and it's like normal to me. what are you so annoyed with, at least she made reads

In post 1113, marry wrote:maybe i'm missing meta here but why mastina of all people, i'm looking at her iso and it's like normal to me. what are you so annoyed with, at least she made reads

She made reads on the whole game.

Where is the justification for those reads, Marry? Go on. Find them for me. Find the justification for a full reads list in Defcon 4.

I won't accept anyone being left out. 24 different people. She needs reasons for all of them. She gave reads on them all after all right?

I don't see her as particularly annoying or intolerable this game. If you think she has more scum equity than usual, sure, but the idea we should preemptively policy her for gamehealth in a game where she is doing nothing wrong is disgusting to me.

I don't think it is a puzzle why I looked in previous treatments of the same player as a contrast in behavior. I explicitly found it scummy, and the response suggesting it is at least partially arbitrary, depending on your personal whim to extend mercy game to game, is not reassuring either way. I recognize that you provided a game-related reason for WH13.

Like "at least she made reads" is a garbage take because anyone can fucking make reads.

I could throw the playerlist into Random.org and post the list here and call it a fucking reads list and that would be "reads".

It doesn't mean shit.

Coincidentally that list might be more accurate than Mastina's hilariously so.

In post 1115, Prism wrote:I don't see her as particularly annoying or intolerable this game. If you think she has more scum equity than usual, sure, but the idea we should preemptively policy her for gamehealth in a game where she is doing nothing wrong is disgusting to me.

I don't think it is a puzzle why I looked in previous treatments of the same player as a contrast in behavior. I explicitly found it scummy, and the response suggesting it is at least partially arbitrary, depending on your personal whim to extend mercy game to game, is not reassuring either way. I recognize that you provided a game-related reason for WH13.

Unfortunately for you I don't need your approval or your vote.

i’ll try to post less in the future, sorry

In post 1114, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 1113, marry wrote:maybe i'm missing meta here but why mastina of all people, i'm looking at her iso and it's like normal to me. what are you so annoyed with, at least she made reads

She made reads on the whole game.

Where is the justification for those reads, Marry? Go on. Find them for me. Find the justification for a full reads list in Defcon 4.

I won't accept anyone being left out. 24 different people. She needs reasons for all of them. She gave reads on them all after all right?

i... i don't vibe with this, i think you would likely be irritated if she had 'reasons' for all of it and wouldn't be satisfied with that either. it's NAI to me, and honestly i can kind of follow mastina's vague train of thought actually

I am having difficulty parsing whether things in this game are sincere personal attacks or not

In post 1118, Merlot wrote:i’ll try to post less in the future, sorry

literally don't listen to The Entity, i think their posts @ you were mean, i really enjoy reading your posts and they make me more comfortable

can we just be nicer to each other... hostile vibes

In post 1101, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Oh some info for people?

I am a silo. I also picked 3 choices before silo. I knew I would get Silo because I told Cakez I was purposefully waiting until the last minute to submit so I would lose all tiebreaks.

I know 3 roles that are guaranteed in this game and its interesting.

This sounds smart

Like this argument that "Mastina is honestly not as bad this time guys"

Is such bullshit because it covers the topic precisely. You know she is bad enough to warrant this on a good day andbyet you are defending her because it hasn't gotten that bad YET.

This is garbage posturing. If you don't wanna vote Mastina you don't have to but don't pretend this wasn't coming a long time now. Don't pretend this is something unreasonable.

Oh and also? Mastina has huge scum equity here so it's not even just a policy. Its literal win win