Mafiascum.net

Spiffeh falls into the “I’m paranoid of how much I’m liking his posts” tier

Something something good pocket target something

This just sounds like Spiffeh. They're an omgus mouse and they push back as either alignment. I like them. They're a cool mouse.

I roughly don't agree with their opinions on sleez and Manatee, not in the reads sense, but how you approached the Manatee wagon as narrated by Lukewarm is a possible example of letting a miselim happen while giving lip service in defense there.

You're not voting Sleez, you're voting a dead slot.

I mean, I love spunk, but that's pretty normal when it comes to shaking people off of them.

I am prone to flattery

Meh

You're doing great Annie.

@Sleez can you explain why you changed your mind about Lukewarm?

@Bell We can call AA a dead slot when she gets prodded/replaced, it is not even 36 hours into the game

I was basically a "dead slot" when you voted for me. I don't have a problem with it because clearly you felt I'd done something to warrant a vote from you.

I feel AA has done enough to warrant a vote from me. What's the difference?

We had a snap townread on arcangel first posting burst but it's gone nowhere.

In post 1106, Spiffeh wrote:@Sleez can you explain why you changed your mind about Lukewarm?

@Bell We can call AA a dead slot when she gets prodded/replaced, it is not even 36 hours into the game

I was basically a "dead slot" when you voted for me. I don't have a problem with it because clearly you felt I'd done something to warrant a vote from you.

I feel AA has done enough to warrant a vote from me. What's the difference?

You'll get to it. Keep reading.

I feel like me voting you will make your slot less dead, while AA9 won't become less dead with time.

We can make her more dead though.

In post 831, Snarky Fishes wrote:no. this is ffery

This is my fave post itg

In post 1075, Medea the Alien wrote:I do want to signal boost dragon's post about LLD choosing a different approach this game being hard null. Don't scumread or townread for it, just run with it.

At some point maybe Lady Rhea (you're getting called that unless it's objectionable, checkmark up if so)

can try to explain the read on me, probably AFTER absorbing the new data.

In post 1110, Annie Edison wrote:We can make her more dead though.

Sure? The only partner I have this game is FF. So it's not like I have anything against blind eliminating and hoping for the best.
But I'm still sorting and I don't really think that's going to get exhausted anytime soon. So I'm not in a rush either.

In post 1003, Snarky Fishes wrote:Sure, sure.
I love wishbone tryhard Cabd.

@Dunnstral, aside from the shard thing, is there anything else that makes you think Titus is town?

-Bell

No, I don't have them that high in my reads

In post 1014, Snarky Fishes wrote:I already asked Dunnstrall if they were scum.

I have two issues:
1. Shard handing out when we were possibly in auto-lose if the game wasn't adjusted.
2. I feel like their Titus read should be the exact opposite of the conclusion they reached. What's to stop Titus from lying about their ability or for them to be scum wanting an extra shard or somethin.

Conventional wisdom says that using that mechanic once shouldn't have resulted in an unwinnable situation for town, and that there would instead be a line between using it too much and losing, or not using it enough and potentially missing out on some upgraded town power.

Now even though it got changed to 9, I'm more wary about using it. I think we should hold off for a day and see what happens.

There's nothing to stop Titus from lying, that's just how I interpreted it.

I didn't know they were close to winning automatically either, but clearly Bork disagreed, so I'm thinking about how much I should be weighing that in terms of what scum are thinking and how much they know versus how much they don't and how that weighed into their play.
Part of me speculates that the scum team game broke and Bork nudged the finish line back when they did. But I don't know, I'm not in a scum PT. *shrug*

Yeah I noticed that you didn't raise her that high and that made sense to me.

-Bell.

In post 1006, Annie Edison wrote:Ninja
I called it a turnstile and Lexi told me I was wrong

This is the turnstile from "Down With Love" where the revolving door has them coming out in the same place with new outfits unless I'm completely hallucinating my memory of that scene because I was busy ogling Ewan McGregor (yes, he's on The List, Cabd, right between the view and Alton Brown).

--PA, who is back and catching up to synch with Cabd

Wall construction in progress, 5 tiers with very light data on each tonight as a starting point, more in depth breakdowns to follow.

Not sure if fferyhead will be around due to doggo's schedule, but will try to engage after said walkies once our reads list is up.

Is that invite-only?

Caught up, not much else really caught my attention, I feel like there's a ton of Lukewarm content that should make me feel things but I feel nothing about him and should probably ISOdive him to form an opinion there.

I feel really good about Manatee's reaction to the pressure she received after her reads list, 664 and 680 feel genuine and reinforce to me that scum!Manatee has no reason to post such an off-the-cuff, haphazard reads list like that. I also liked her string of airport responses.

I told myself I would stop at 9 PM and it's after 11 PM so I better get overtime compensation in the form of locktown reads

Also Cabd/PA please don't let me wake up to some unexpected color-coded case against me tomorrow that would be kinda bothersome!

HURT: Nobody
VOTE: ArcAngel9

In post 1047, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 1045, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 1041, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I did like three times

I still don't get it

Scum HAD an alternate wincondition of 7 2-sharded players alive or dead, right?

If knowledge that we started 2-sharded was out, and town played to shard players... and scum shot us early, they could use their not-nightkill method to shard players OTHER than the sharded one that had crumbed or expressed interest in getting sharded from the town mechanic to likely get to 5 (assuming one 2-sharded scum demon in play, which is likely) by the start of day two. You don't see how that's absolutely fucking horrifying?

Oh right, we never mentioned that we feel due to Xenoblade II that scum likely have some sort of super conditional vig. Our working theory is a oneshot vig that only works on demons. The above math applies this asusmption.

To elaborate on this, I'm assuming there's a way scum can get a kill off while still using their factional shard-scatter power once. That actually amplifies with a nine-demon wincon, as gaining seven demons in a mini is likely to be harder, which means they need some way to keep the game manageable in the meantime if going for that wincon. Which is unlikely to be a complete red herring.

This also feels like a good time to note that contrary to some expressed fears in the thread, I'm unlikely to get especially emotional going forward. You're welcome.

--PA

In post 1120, Spiffeh wrote:Also Cabd/PA please don't let me wake up to some unexpected color-coded case against me tomorrow that would be kinda bothersome!

I assure you that you aren't in our bottom most tier. Other than that you'll have to wait and find out. P.S. no color coded case for you, cakez~

Medea, can you guys simplify why you being a demon means scum can get to 7 in a way that is too fast?

They can send 2 shards instead of their night kill, and there are possibly roles that start with 1 shard or send out 1 shard. Is there anything else?