Mafiascum.net

In post 1093, Gamma Emerald wrote:These are some of the post I liked most

In post 94, AliceK wrote:

In post 55, T3 wrote:

In post 47, Jolyne wrote:not to towntell, but this game started?

I think Jolyne is town for this. They did a very similar thing in Purgatory when they townslipped but then admitted they didn't read the setup to make them have a higher chance of townslipping and this is reminding me of that.

"Didn't read the setup" townslip is very dangerous as it is easy too fake.

Good early vigilance (though I will admit, doesn't exactly mesh with her toxic defense later...?)

In post 177, AliceK wrote:

In post 109, marcistar wrote:

In post 87, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't wanna see anyone acting stupid this game, or you'll have my unlimited fury poured into destroying you. When I have a solve, you'll LISTEN TO IT.

depends

In post 95, AliceK wrote:VOTE: darby

I don't like his posts.

what dont u like about them

Comment about vig shot sounded fake. Almost like he tried very hard to act as uninformed as possible. This mindset comes from scum.

Good, thought-out early read.

In post 260, AliceK wrote:

In post 167, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think one of the few posts that pinged me as sus earlier is Alice’s: "T3 is being voted a lot, is there an meta reason for that?" post.

In post 168, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The only way to get reads is to keep the very real threat of DEATH hanging over the heads of those that wish to mislead us.

PROVE ME WRONG.

In post 169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: AliceK

Where is your head at ATM?

I see your point. I agree however I have a gut feeling that T3 is town and we should look somewhere else.

Trying to make better wagons happen, that's a town move imo, scum would tend to be indifferent to some degree (town can be too but I'm saying being picky about wagons is a towntell, that doesn't mean vice versa)

In post 261, AliceK wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

alicek

you seem fine enough rn, but

In post 93, AliceK wrote:

In post 19, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hey Alice, remember that time you asked me if i’d buss both my teammates as scum and i answered no then proceeded to endgame as mafia?


GOOD TIMES~

Haha, very well played. I was suspecting you, but couldn't find good arguments to accuse you. Just hoped I was paranoid. Didn't happen.

do you have any sort of read on norwegianboyee rn..? im curious if anything seems similar to that play you've seen from him, or if you have a townread on him..?

Not much yet. My belief is that people like norwegianboyee you caught in a later stage of the game as they are not doing many mistakes early. Nevertheless, I think in this game he is in "solving" attitude much earlier, so I would say a slight town-lean.

this feels like a very long-term-minded approach to norwee, which I think is town-indicative because scum would want to keep options open.

In post 466, AliceK wrote:

In post 307, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

toxictaipan

im interested in ur input on this val stuff, do u mind giving some thoughts about that and anything else u may have thought of..?

The past 13 pages are exhausting. If I were Val and scum in this situation, I'd be giving some better replies, though. Town is looking for an excuse to lim him and the chip on the shoulder attitude might just be it. I think scum Val would realize this and not be so standoffish.

I think the interactions between DArby and NorwegianboyEE are much more interesting, but can't quite pin a read either way on the two yet.

That's not quite valid. You assume that as Town he would not try to get out of bad situation. Of course you may say there is more Townies than Mafia (more spare parts ), but still it doesn't mean that a one would just give up.

It's not Val post what you should look at.
Also it is not clear for me what DArby's alignment is, but there are better options for today.
UNVOTE:

This was a pretty good post when Val was being targeted
while some people only tried to call Val not scum, Alice actually tried to push elsewhere as well

In post 954, AliceK wrote:I don't think toxic is Mafia, because these 2 posts:

In post 307, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

toxictaipan

im interested in ur input on this val stuff, do u mind giving some thoughts about that and anything else u may have thought of..?

The past 13 pages are exhausting. If I were Val and scum in this situation, I'd be giving some better replies, though. Town is looking for an excuse to lim him and the chip on the shoulder attitude might just be it. I think scum Val would realize this and not be so standoffish.

I think the interactions between DArby and NorwegianboyEE are much more interesting, but can't quite pin a read either way on the two yet.

Val was in quite bad spot. I don't think the low posting scum, would jump into the thread to provide arguments against elimination.

In post 308, toxictaipan wrote:

In post 306, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 305, marcistar wrote:

In post 1, Datisi wrote:~ all members of the

mafia

are

backup ascetics

. they may or may not have additional roles and/or modifiers.

wwhats an ascetic..

Check your role pm

Lol but for real, though. I honestly don't know either.

He would need to fake a townslip. That isn't something very popular to do.

while these aren't exactly strong points it felt like Alice meant what she was saying

In post 1106, Gamma Emerald wrote:Fuck off.

In post 1100, Val89 wrote:I'm warming up to idea, I can't lie.

In post 1111, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1106, Gamma Emerald wrote:Fuck off.

I’m probably the least qualified person in the world to say this.
But hey, try not to be like me… =_=

In post 998, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 796, toxictaipan wrote:Apologies for my activity sins. I completely understand why I'm getting wagon'd for that. But, that doesn't make the wagon on me any less opportunistic. My content is so low that the only valid argument is I am potentially lurker scum. I'm highly suspect of the slots seriously pushing for my elim right now. Essentially taking my inactivity for granted.

This is the robot speak

In post 1000, Dwlee99 wrote:Stilted is a word but also just lacking much emotion or feeling. Like the last two lines says he thinks people are taking his activity for granted (emotionally charged phrase) but that emotion doesn't really appear in any way.

Like I think this

In post 796, toxictaipan wrote:There was a specific post of Norwee's (I think the one or two right before my vote) that jumped out as super scummy to me. I will go back and quote when not on mobile. Definitely my top ping at the moment. More since then (possibly from someone else, I can't keep all y'alls animals avatars straight in my mind) trying to explain my logic for my vote using information that had not even happened as of the time of my vote was also super wrong and scummy.

Doesn't represent the same amount of emotion as he tried to display in the other paragraph.