Page 46 of 49
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:22 pm
by Fate
↑ Llamarble wrote:Fate and LLD both had pretty excellent reads.
I was indeed terrified LLD would vig me and roleblocked her on 55 N2.
NO
FUCKING
SHIT
That was more solid than ANYTHIG else
LLD had two town n her sights so FATE roleblocked her for WIFOM?
Jesus hell
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:25 pm
by Darox
This game was a disgrace.
Obvious scum were obvious.
Obvious town trackers were obvious.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:26 pm
by Darox
↑ zoraster wrote:Vanilla Townie Side Game!
Darox beats SpyreX, 27-22
Perfect game!
10 Yos 9 Andrius 8 Seraphim
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 pm
by Llamarble
[quote=Darox]Well that was stupid.
Stand by what I said day 1 or 2 or whenever.
Lynching Furcolow is always protown, no matter what role he has.[/quote]
De Ja Vu
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 pm
by Llamarble
Darox wrote:Well that was stupid.
Stand by what I said day 1 or 2 or whenever.
Lynching Furcolow is always protown, no matter what role he has.
De Ja Vu
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:30 pm
by SpyreX
I thought your play midway through the game was excellent, pretending not to be the bulletproof, and hoping to either draw a fakeclaim or a nightkill. I guess SpyreX was paranoid about losing to you.
It wasn't that. I'll lose to Fate anytime and only give him a good natured ribbing.
It wasn't even the serendipity of the start because up until Sera apparently stumbled onto the fact there was something TRULY FASCINATING AND STUPID that happened D1 considering the Tracker PM's WERE IDENTICAL YET SOMEHOW NANNERS that made it all fall apart.
Its my bad and I feel like an ass but god in heaven.
Fate, Sera, can you forgive?
At least and this is meta I'll damn use, that stupid red text is now a killable offense. That's nice.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:31 pm
by zoraster
red text, spyrex?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:31 pm
by Llamarble
Grey actually thought his red text was true when he wrote it.
He didn't intend for it to be a lie; he worded it creatively.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:33 pm
by zoraster
i thought it was the truth. He really WAS a BP.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:33 pm
by Darox
↑ Darox wrote: ↑ zoraster wrote:Vanilla Townie Side Game!
Darox beats SpyreX, 27-22
Perfect game!
10 Yos 9 Andrius 8 Seraphim
Oh wait Spyrex actually cheated and got in a night action on N4.
I declare super-victory because I would have played 7 on Fate.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:34 pm
by zoraster
as i explained in my QT I actually had a setup that was this only two town BPs and only one VT instead of the other way around.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:34 pm
by SpyreX
Hey I played my 3 like a good VT or something.
I'm really glad you were town Darox and I didn't go full retard.
As for the red text blah blah:
You are not bulletproof
BOOM DONE SHOOP SHOOP
Killable.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:35 pm
by zoraster
yeah, darox. I would have let you select if spyrex's pick would have put him over your total.
that said, SpyreX's play was better for town as a whole. Playing a 3 was a more protown action.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:36 pm
by Llamarble
Was there a dead QT?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:39 pm
by zoraster
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:39 pm
by zoraster
you can see me second guess the scum, which obviously shows how much I know
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:44 pm
by SpyreX
I didn't see it in the dead chat and I NEED to know deep in my heart before this dark chapter can lay to rest:
What in the HELL happened as exact as possible to cause tracker-gate?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:48 pm
by zoraster
I'll copy what I sent to Vi:
zoraster wrote:Okay, so you remember how I had two trackers. Day 1 and virtually everyone is claiming. Yos claims first, Lurc eventually CC's and says:
↑ Lurconis wrote:
↑ Yosarian2 wrote: On the other hand, if I track a town power role who's doing something and spend any points at all, then I see what they're doing.
I actually had that clarified with Zoraster during night 0 and was told I have to outbid town power roles to track them. His lying about this made me realize he was scum that was why i kept my vote on him.
I wanted to go ahead and counter claim once I noticed people were going for a massclaim. I don't want any other possible town PR's to out themselves when there is no need.
I attempted to track Darox night 0 but failed to track him or he didn't go anywhere this does not make him town or scum it makes him vt or someone I didn't outbid be it town or scum.
The thing is... I don't THINK I said this. I can see where he got confused, but i didn't say it. In fact, his tracker works exactly like Yos'. It tracks everyone except the night kill, and then it will track the NK if it plays higher. These are the only interactions iwth Lurc I could find in sequential order:
zoraster wrote:Lurconis wrote:Clarification question if I happen to target say a cop or a roleblocker etc.. and my card is higher I can track them as well correct not just the killer?
Eitherwar I target dorax and use my 6 card
Yeah. You track anyone. I was just showing that if the mafia kill is higher than your card, you won't track them to the kill. But if say darox is the tickler and you visit him to Zoraster, you'll see that.
zoraster wrote:You did not see Darox visit anyone last night.
zoraster wrote:Lurconis wrote:You probably can't clarify further but just in case I would have received that message if I hadn't bid high enough or if I had bid high enough and he didn't go anywhere correct?
Correct.
So my question is this: I didn't mislead him, right? He misread my comments?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:50 pm
by Darox
↑ zoraster wrote:yeah, darox. I would have let you select if spyrex's pick would have put him over your total.
that said, SpyreX's play was better for town as a whole. Playing a 3 was a more protown action.
Eh, I didn't trust that the mafia restock ability worked exactly as written, plus I doubted I would be a target for said ability, so I was just shrugging off as many points as I could each night.
Laughing at Andrius in the dead QT though.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:50 pm
by Cogito Ergo Sum
The "Roleblock LLD" plan makes perfect sense regardless of the scum though. Why the hell would you give the town a free town-directed kill when you can avoid it?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:53 pm
by zoraster
for what it's worth, and I know I'll take some flak for this, but I've nommed GreyICE for cunning manipulator. I think insofar as that award is really meant for someone who manipulates people into doing something, GreyICE really succeeded in doing that.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:55 pm
by GreyICE
By the by, that tracker x 2 us just evil with the mafia framer.
Even if framer is higher he gets tracked and that is just baaaad.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:55 pm
by Cogito Ergo Sum
zoraster wrote:Lurconis wrote:Clarification question if I happen to target say a cop or a roleblocker etc.. and my card is higher I can track them as well correct not just the killer?
Eitherwar I target dorax and use my 6 card
Yeah. You track anyone. I was just showing that if the mafia kill is higher than your card, you won't track them to the kill. But if say darox is the tickler and you visit him to Zoraster, you'll see that.
From Lurc's question, it's pretty clear he's got a wrong notion about what his role does and your answer doesn't really address it. That seems like tacitly supporting his understanding of the role to me.
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:57 pm
by Cogito Ergo Sum
↑ zoraster wrote:for what it's worth, and I know I'll take some flak for this, but I've nommed GreyICE for cunning manipulator. I think insofar as that award is really meant for someone who manipulates people into doing something, GreyICE really succeeded in doing that.
Getting Spyre to vote for the wrong person is scummyworthy?
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:03 pm
by Llamarble
There wasn't any possibility of us running out of points on the last day anyway because of our theft-power, so I wasn't worried about that at all.