In post 950, Thor665 wrote:My case on her would be null, probably with a slight scum lean.
In post 1026, Thor665 wrote:I am able to objectively look at Smarg and admit she's not a blinding wall of town
Also, y'know, CTD is *whining* at me because I've expressed less than a town read on Smarg.
Like, it's the core of his conversation for the last few posts.
But, good thing you're willing to hammer her since you're paying attention to this game.
In post 1138, CrashTextDummie wrote:It does say something about your alignment that you're unwilling to compromise in a situation where the wagon you're on has basically reached it's full potential (Bro, TSO, Smargaret have expressed town reads, Pere has expressed a townread on my predecessor and "liked the cut of my jib", PA has never given any indication of wanting to vote me), the compromise at hand is not someone you're town reading, and the issue of forcing claims early is apparently important enough to you that you'd put it on your wiki.
How many games of mine, that you read, had me trying to force a claim at least a week before deadline?
Also, I don't agree with your take on your wagon's ability to grow.
Also I find your concept of my read on Smarg to be disingenuous and manipulative in how you're choosing to present it here as compared to my read on you and where my vote is.
In post 1140, CrashTextDummie wrote:In the games I read, I did not see any instance of Thor refusing to compromise on a scum lean. I repeated my request for him to provide an example of this and I inquired again as to why and when, if at all, he refuses to compromise on a scum lean. What's the issue?
That you're presenting a false premise and using it in a meaningless way to just try to bully for a lynch that has nothing to do with it even if I happened to be lying about how I play.
Which you should already know I don't - since your last time calling me out on my play went so shocking different than what I said it was.
