Mafiascum.net

Shadow_step looks pretty town to me

Why?

Just his tone and what he's pushing

Dunnstral wrote:Also you asking for explanations but not providing any of your own

To the contrary, I've explained almost all my reads, save four at this point, and one of them is because nobody's asked. (Chip Butty.)

The only explanation I'm holding back on is an explanation which once I give, will absolutely dominate the game.
I don't want to give that yet.

What's your excuse?

In post 1128, Ranger wrote:What's your excuse?

I don't want to

Really though it's not meant to be an explanation for you to understand why you're scummy, I was talking to Chip.

In post 1128, Ranger wrote:The only explanation I'm holding back on is an explanation which once I give, will absolutely dominate the game.

And then you get lynched?

Dunnstral wrote:I don't want to

And if you say this with sincerity, any and all strength behind your accusation against me not posting mine is lost.

Dunnstral wrote:And then you get lynched?

I'm not getting lynched.

People may try, they won't succeed.

But when I post my cases on my scumreads, any hope of focusing outside of you three will be lost.

I don't think anyone wants that yet.
In particular, BTD6 and Scott Brosius('s slot?) are in desperate need of content, but they're not the only ones.

Nah the only people I have no read on at all are Scott and BTD6

Scott saying that bit about me and karnos not being town v town sounded like a setup but the rest of his stuff was ok and he's been gone so long we just need a new person in the slot

BTD6 I'm not really seeing him as anything but null despite a few scumreads his way, interested in what he has to say

Duppin and Shadow I'm leaning town on from their tone and posts and pushes

In post 1131, Ranger wrote:

Dunnstral wrote:I don't want to

And if you say this with sincerity, any and all strength behind your accusation against me not posting mine is lost.

This is wrong but I'll let you figure out why

BTD6 should be coming in here soon enough.

If he doesn't, there's reason to be suspicious of him.

Heh heh. Yes.

In post 1132, Ranger wrote:

Dunnstral wrote:And then you get lynched?

I'm not getting lynched.

People may try, they won't succeed.

But when I post my cases on my scumreads, any hope of focusing outside of you three will be lost.

I don't think anyone wants that yet.
In particular, BTD6 and Scott Brosius('s slot?) are in desperate need of content, but they're not the only ones.

In post 1135, Ranger wrote:BTD6 should be coming in here soon enough.

If he doesn't, there's reason to be suspicious of him.

What I am not quite seeing though: By "you three", I take it you mean [plobin, Panther, Dunstral]; If all hope of focussing outside that three will be lost, which sounds like you have already locked them in as scum, why does BTD's and Scott's input matter? And why in 1135 do you say BTD will be suspicious if he doesn't check in soon? Okay, I get . But if you think you've identified the scum trio, how does he fit in?

Note: Probably v/la until Sunday night.

Alright, enough is enough.

VOTE: Ranger

But do I have this right, Panther and Dunnstral, if Ranger flips scum I'm more likely to be scum too?

Fair warning: I am going t be VERY suspicious of anyone jumping on the Ranger wagon before she has a chance to state the case she has been promising. And that goes for hopalong ploben ^, who has already done so. Lynching Ranger before she says what she has to say can only have a scum motivation; Town will not be afraid to hear her out, if they are confident in their case against her.

I'm going to be absent most of the day, monthly D&D game is today. I'll try to get caught up tonight after the kid is asleep.

In post 1142, Chip Butty wrote:Fair warning: I am going t be VERY suspicious of anyone jumping on the Ranger wagon before she has a chance to state the case she has been promising. And that goes for hopalong ploben ^, who has already done so. Lynching Ranger before she says what she has to say can only have a scum motivation; Town will not be afraid to hear her out, if they are confident in their case against her.

So previously I was suspicious for wanting to wait to vote Ranger before she presented her case and now that I want to push her to do so I'm suspicious. Which way is it Butty? Suspicious no matter what?

I'm preparing my analysis. Expect eleven walls of deep Iso of every player.

I will only consider up to Page 40 for now (1000 posts).

In post 1142, Chip Butty wrote:Fair warning: I am going t be VERY suspicious of anyone jumping on the Ranger wagon before she has a chance to state the case she has been promising. And that goes for hopalong ploben ^, who has already done so. Lynching Ranger before she says what she has to say can only have a scum motivation; Town will not be afraid to hear her out, if they are confident in their case against her.

Why hasn't she posted it then?

Ranger should write clickbait headlines

"If you could lynch the whole scum team without doing any work, would you? Because it's kinda possible."

"A case against three scum that will restore your faith in humanity."

There's a secret war going on in this town. And you may be fooled by people you trust."

"A beacon of town townieness gets pushed and pressured by scum who thought they were fooling everyone. You won't believe what happens next."

"Scum hate her! The secret to hunting mafiosos that they don't want you to know about!"

Except you get a 404 error when you click bc she won't even write the super disappointing content hidden behind the trumped up headline

And...