Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 1:47 pm
I don't see anything bad about it.
I don't see anything bad about it.
In post 1097, Varsoon wrote:@MOD: You said that the kill resolves before the sword is claimed, however, does the kill resolve AFTER or BEFORE it is decided which claimer will get it?
IE:
Is it SCENARIO 1: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Sword will random roll to player A. Scum kill player A. Sword is unclaimed in the morning because A died before they could claim it
or
SCENARIO 2: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Scum kill player A. Claim is rolled post-kill and goes to player B since they are the only one going for Sword?
... That changes things a little. Not too much, but a little.In post 1127, FakeGod wrote:In post 1097, Varsoon wrote:@MOD: You said that the kill resolves before the sword is claimed, however, does the kill resolve AFTER or BEFORE it is decided which claimer will get it?
IE:
Is it SCENARIO 1: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Sword will random roll to player A. Scum kill player A. Sword is unclaimed in the morning because A died before they could claim it
or
SCENARIO 2: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Scum kill player A. Claim is rolled post-kill and goes to player B since they are the only one going for Sword?Scenario 1.
I considered commenting, but then realized I had nothing useful to say. Do you want to hear anything in particular?In post 1131, Elsa Jay wrote:Smart, I'm also gonna have to call you out for not even commenting on the recent events of my pre-determined challenge. I know we're having 2 different discussions right now, but you HAVE to realise it's bad your not commenting on me or Lady right now.
No they can't...? Unless they manage to guess which player gets the sword every single night. There's no reason why it needs to be successfully assigned N1, and every one of those 'certain players' scum kills is a kill that they were restricted on, and didn't get to kill whoever they wanted. I'm not saying it's foolproof, but there's more merit to it than you seem to realize.In post 1132, Varsoon wrote:No.
Especially because the second that it becomes 'certain players', scum can kill those certain players and rob us of the mechanic.
I'd say that's true, but...In post 1134, Something_Smart wrote:I considered commenting, but then realized I had nothing useful to say. Do you want to hear anything in particular?In post 1131, Elsa Jay wrote:Smart, I'm also gonna have to call you out for not even commenting on the recent events of my pre-determined challenge. I know we're having 2 different discussions right now, but you HAVE to realise it's bad your not commenting on me or Lady right now.
You legit picked Dva's offhand comment on Arianne out of our discussion and ONLY that. Your not calling me out for being scummy, townie, proactively giving an agreement or disagreement of what I'm doing. Your not looking into Lady, and at this point, I feel like that's intentional distancing.Something_Smart wrote:I don't see anything bad about it.
No, I agree with you. While I don’t go out of my way to do reaction tests, there are a really great way to sort hard to read players, because they’re extremely difficult to fake and his reaction to that “misunderstanding” we had, read townie to me. I’m liking this post of yours but I really want to get as many decent reads as possible before EOD, so I’d prefer you don’t rush the gladiate.In post 1108, Elsa Jay wrote:She's the key to having a flowchart of events going on. You and UT will solve yourselves, but she doesn't feel like town to many, either. If You couldn't tell, I havent liked her since her first post, so this isn't really an "outta nowhere" pick.
At this point when she flips scum, I'm confident we can townclear a bunch of people more then we can on the offchance Auro flips scum. And I feel Auro actually engaging and speculating with the mechanics, while it could conceivably be a feint, I'm going off the fact that my heart and gut says he's town. And it's right 85 % of the time.
If I can stop you all from hanging my big townread while having the chance to hang my big scumread, I'll take it.
Considering you're getting told it's outright happening in a few hours why not.In post 1137, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know how I'm going to vote. It will probably come down to which I am more afraid of: scum-LLD or town-you.
I don't see why you should expect me to determine this before the challenge.
LLD is well-known for her strong emotional play as town and as scum.In post 1135, Elsa Jay wrote:Your not looking into Lady, and at this point, I feel like that's intentional distancing.
Well, the day's not over yet. There will be more information available after the challenge is issued.In post 1138, MariaR wrote:Considering you're getting told it's outright happening in a few hours why not.In post 1137, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know how I'm going to vote. It will probably come down to which I am more afraid of: scum-LLD or town-you.
I don't see why you should expect me to determine this before the challenge.
In post 1141, Something_Smart wrote:And I don't think LLD's even reacted to Jay saying he'll challenge her.
She already stated her reason isnt a scumread on me, but a policy. I'm not evening denying anyone time with a duel but they sure seem so.In post 1003, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:We have 5 days. If Elsa decides to duel anyone prematurely, denying us time, please murder them.
I did. It reads scummy to me in general that anyone who has 5 posts or less. uses a HURT tag. It reads like tryharding to me but yeah, she had a questionable and shitty case for HURTING me.In post 1122, DVa wrote:Ok 12 hours is fine then.
I support these:
HURT: Auro
LLD
Ariane
Curious if anyone else had a negative reaction to 371?
LAMIST is what came to my mind.
I mean, yeah, sure, but you're kinda doing it to yourself by challenging one of the loudest players in the game.In post 1143, Elsa Jay wrote:Regardless of what You think of my Town game, Smart, I'm always trying to get better. So please take this time seriously now.
What part of it strikes you as LAMIST?In post 1145, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:LAMIST is what came to my mind.
Okay, so Varsoon has the right idea then. Confirming any player to claim the sword in advance, is basically a death warrant if they’re town.In post 1127, FakeGod wrote:In post 1097, Varsoon wrote:@MOD: You said that the kill resolves before the sword is claimed, however, does the kill resolve AFTER or BEFORE it is decided which claimer will get it?
IE:
Is it SCENARIO 1: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Sword will random roll to player A. Scum kill player A. Sword is unclaimed in the morning because A died before they could claim it
or
SCENARIO 2: Player A and B go to claim Sword. Scum kill player A. Claim is rolled post-kill and goes to player B since they are the only one going for Sword?Scenario 1.
+1In post 1132, Varsoon wrote:No.
Especially because the second that it becomes 'certain players', scum can kill those certain players and rob us of the mechanic.