Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:58 am
exhibit: rc analysis on me being scumIn post 779, RadiantCowbells wrote:Kinda think DDL is a woofin
Page 46 of 144
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:58 am
In post 1100, RadiantCowbells wrote:My scumread was perfectly valid given your awful opener.In post 1097, Creature wrote:Well, that explains your shitty scumread on me.In post 1008, RadiantCowbells wrote:My ability to aid town wincon from a position of being heavily scumread is negligible.
No, it wasn't.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:59 am
DDL, I don't follow up on questions when they're directed towards my strongest townreads. I trust my teammates to have their own reasons for not answering a question.
As for your analysis, you still haven't offered any evidence that I'm more likely to follow up on unanswered questions as town than scum. Showing that I followed up on some unanswered questions as town doesn't mean that I'm MORE LIKELY to do so as town than scum. To make that claim (and you made that claim), you need to show that I follow up on a greater percentage of unanswered quetions as town than I do as scum, which means you need to see how many questions I didn't follow up on as town (there's many in all my games), and you also need to see how many questions I followed up on or didn't follow up on as scum (and showing that I didn't follow up on any questions as scum when looking at my ISO doesn't tell you anything since you need to actually show there were unanswered questions).
As for your analysis, you still haven't offered any evidence that I'm more likely to follow up on unanswered questions as town than scum. Showing that I followed up on some unanswered questions as town doesn't mean that I'm MORE LIKELY to do so as town than scum. To make that claim (and you made that claim), you need to show that I follow up on a greater percentage of unanswered quetions as town than I do as scum, which means you need to see how many questions I didn't follow up on as town (there's many in all my games), and you also need to see how many questions I followed up on or didn't follow up on as scum (and showing that I didn't follow up on any questions as scum when looking at my ISO doesn't tell you anything since you need to actually show there were unanswered questions).
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:59 am
I needed something entertaining and making fun of scumreaders is great.In post 1103, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ok so why would you do that?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:59 am
Creature, why are you scumreading me? What is the agenda behind my reads?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 am
actually I jokingly claimed scumIn post 1103, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're essentially claiming you played your scumgame
Dunno, you kept it for some reason.then you wolfread me fo falling you scum for it, no?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 am
What if I didn't bother to read and reevaluate and just lynched you for it and then I got lynched myself and we went down to 9pIn post 1128, Creature wrote:I needed something entertaining and making fun of scumreaders is great.In post 1103, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ok so why would you do that?
How funny would that have been?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 am
You're pretty underwhelming and seemed very different from Starcraft 2.In post 1104, Shoshin wrote:Creature, why are you scumreading me?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:01 am
We are now cleanly out of Creature scum range and anybody who's currently voting him needs to move their vote.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:01 am
I didn't play Starcraft 2. That was entirely the worst.In post 1132, Creature wrote:You're pretty underwhelming and seemed very different from Starcraft 2.In post 1104, Shoshin wrote:Creature, why are you scumreading me?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:01 am
Entertain me on DDL?In post 1117, RadiantCowbells wrote:Tarkus is my second strongest scumread over DDL right now.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:02 am
Actually, I made like 2 or 3 posts in Starcraft 2 about how we were not going to sign our posts. The rest of the posts were the worst though.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:02 am
In post 1120, Yachting n Socializing wrote:ok then idgi explain pleaseIn post 1118, Shoshin wrote:That's not how I'm using the word "mechanical."In post 1112, Yachting n Socializing wrote:I dont think it is mechanical? I havent talked about setup spec at all this game.In post 1110, Shoshin wrote:Not tonally, but in terms of how mechanical your analysis is, yes.In post 1107, Yachting n Socializing wrote:I'm a bit offended, my play seems like Mathblade?In post 1086, Shoshin wrote:I was scumreading Boats because his analysis is so mechanical, almost reminds me of someone like Mathblade, but I'm willing to let that go for the moment.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:02 am
In post 560, Tarkus wrote:RC I'll chill on yellow for today and let you do your thing. If I'm right you'll see it eventually. You're not hitting scum if you lynch me though and we should do roomy or creature instead.
UNVOTE:
In post 574, Tarkus wrote:Roomy lynch would give us more to go on tomorrow
Tarkus seems pretty opportunistic on roomy here.In post 576, Tarkus wrote:Distancing is a decent bet, they both scumread each other pretty early. And I think roomy is one of the scummier players in his own right.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:03 am
saudade never follows up on your Post #112 in your sscum game, and you never call him out on it. Plus it's common sense that scum is less involved in trying to hunt scum and only puts on a facade of caring.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:03 am
And the idea that I'm underwhelming in this game is bullshit. I haven't been underhwelming. I made my top scumread who I was voting replace out in fear. Just because I don't post as much as others doesn't mean my posts themselves are underhwelming. I've managed to get townreads from the stronger townies in the game (e.g. RC, COA, Enigma), while pushing my reads to the extent I wanted them pushed.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:04 am
It feels like you're trying not to give up on your reads because you need to follow the agenda.In post 1129, Shoshin wrote:What is the agenda behind my reads?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:04 am
I wouldn't expect town to lynch too early anyway even if they thought someone scumclaimed.In post 1131, RadiantCowbells wrote:What if I didn't bother to read and reevaluate and just lynched you for it and then I got lynched myself and we went down to 9pIn post 1128, Creature wrote:I needed something entertaining and making fun of scumreaders is great.In post 1103, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ok so why would you do that?
How funny would that have been?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
I dunno where I am rn :/In post 1133, Yachting n Socializing wrote:We are now cleanly out of Creature scum range and anybody who's currently voting him needs to move their vote.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
Huh? What reads am I trying to hold onto?In post 1141, Creature wrote:It feels like you're trying not to give up on your reads because you need to follow the agenda.In post 1129, Shoshin wrote:What is the agenda behind my reads?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
And WHAT is the agenda? You didn't answer my question.In post 1144, Shoshin wrote:Huh? What reads am I trying to hold onto?In post 1141, Creature wrote:It feels like you're trying not to give up on your reads because you need to follow the agenda.In post 1129, Shoshin wrote:What is the agenda behind my reads?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
This is really a deep, but entertaining, string of posts.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
Oh the ninjas
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:05 am
the guy lit replaced out cause he felt the game was clique-y... anything more and you are twisting the narrative to suit you.In post 1140, Shoshin wrote:I made my top scumread who I was voting replace out in fear.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:06 am
lmao I defended your slot there because I thought you were posting.In post 1134, Shoshin wrote:I didn't play Starcraft 2. That was entirely the worst.In post 1132, Creature wrote:You're pretty underwhelming and seemed very different from Starcraft 2.In post 1104, Shoshin wrote:Creature, why are you scumreading me?