Page 46 of 53
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:17 am
by Looker
I might've misunderstood. I read that as you saying accidents were a Titus signature.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:20 am
by Titus
I didn't rush an L-1. Those familiar with the game wouldn't quick hammer. You can't claim I manufactured a narrative of rushing, when it's literally your complaint against me.
Again, you haven't discussed balance at all but you're fully campaigning for votes when only one mislynch should remain. That's odd.
I do not understand your last bullet point. Are you saying my VCA theory is fake? Then why not ask me to support it?
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:20 am
by Titus
In post 1125, Looker wrote:I might've misunderstood. I read that as you saying accidents were a Titus signature.
No. VCA is.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:21 am
by Titus
That's why I voted DDL. I saw either Amrun or DDL had to be scum. Prior wagons suggested DDL and you as a team. So I voted. I had been Mia due to forgetting and legit didn't see it was a hammer.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:25 am
by Looker
And "seem" is such a weird word that allows for a disclaimer and ambiguity. It's difficult to know and address how you interpret me. And it lacks conviction or accountability. I feel you get to brush it off as "it
seemed
that way".
p-edit: I'm saying that you rushed, not me. I don't know what the campaigning thing means. You said hammering DDL wasn't suspicious, but had to come up with an excuse for it.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:25 am
by Looker
Either way, I think we win.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:27 am
by Looker
If you, myself and Amrun are the questionables, then chamber and bugspray can kill whoever's left tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:30 am
by Titus
In post 1129, Looker wrote:And "seem" is such a weird word that allows for a disclaimer and ambiguity. It's difficult to know and address how you interpret me. And it lacks conviction or accountability. I feel you get to brush it off as "it
seemed
that way".
p-edit: I'm saying that you rushed, not me. I don't know what the campaigning thing means. You said hammering DDL wasn't suspicious, but had to come up with an excuse for it.
Campaigning = strongly advocating.
For anyone who knows me, that hammer is not suspect. It's just stating what we knew for the benefit of you and bugspray who don't know my reliance on it.
You aren't surprised by my VCA leading to you. This only became a push you made after Amrun suspected me.
P-edit: You and Creature are the only two suspect slots for me.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:37 am
by Looker
Creature = Chamber or Creature = bugspray?
I don't know you. Does "It's just stating what we knew for the benefit of you and bugspray who don't know my reliance on it." mean that bugspray doesn't either? This is a bit much. It's bogging.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:39 am
by Looker
I'm either going to trust Amrun or kill her - that's where I'm at.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:41 am
by Titus
In post 1133, Looker wrote:Creature = Chamber or Creature = bugspray?
I don't know you. Does "It's just stating what we knew for the benefit of you and bugspray who don't know my reliance on it." mean that bugspray doesn't either? This is a bit much. It's bogging.
Creature=chamber consistently.
You and bugspray are both newer unless he's an alt. We never played together.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:42 am
by Titus
In post 1134, Looker wrote:I'm either going to trust Amrun or kill her - that's where I'm at.
You should use your night kill on her here.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:45 am
by Looker
Please be serious. I really need this win for my self-confidence.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:12 pm
by bugspray
In post 1135, Titus wrote: In post 1133, Looker wrote:Creature = Chamber or Creature = bugspray?
I don't know you. Does "It's just stating what we knew for the benefit of you and bugspray who don't know my reliance on it." mean that bugspray doesn't either? This is a bit much. It's bogging.
Creature=chamber consistently.
You and bugspray are both newer unless he's an alt. We never played together.
Who is possibly an alt?
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:19 pm
by bugspray
In post 575, Wimpy wrote: In post 572, Amrun wrote:No one is policy lynching DDL for lurking. We think he is scum.
Yet not a single person has posted an actual reason for why he is scum.
In post 576, Wimpy wrote:
I don’t know. He’s lurking and hasn’t posted enough. I don’t see how anyone could town or scum read him and nobody has provided reason for why he’s scum.
In post 599, Wimpy wrote:Ddl should be given until Tuesday for his thing to be over. He isn’t being given a fair chance to play and if he flips town cause town didn’t want to wait a couple of days, that’s just terrible.
As I was reminded unnecessarily, this is a team game and if he is town, the team didn’t care enough to honor his request.
In post 601, Wimpy wrote:
I’m not refusing to work as a team though. I just don’t agree with a ddl lynch. No convincing argument has been made. Disagreement isn’t refusal
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:42 pm
by Titus
In post 1138, bugspray wrote: In post 1135, Titus wrote: In post 1133, Looker wrote:Creature = Chamber or Creature = bugspray?
I don't know you. Does "It's just stating what we knew for the benefit of you and bugspray who don't know my reliance on it." mean that bugspray doesn't either? This is a bit much. It's bogging.
Creature=chamber consistently.
You and bugspray are both newer unless he's an alt. We never played together.
Who is possibly an alt?
No one now, since you're asking.
Also Wimpy appears to have site flaked. A newbie demanding a reason to SR a lurker is normal. He's new.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:42 pm
by Titus
Scum wouldn't link themselves that hard. He'd be coached by DDL.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:45 pm
by bugspray
Do you think he'd actually take the advice or say fuck off I know what I'm doing?
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:45 pm
by bugspray
Which one did he do in the scum pt?
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:46 pm
by Looker
Amrun and I are going to kill each other. If Titus is alive tomorrow, kill her, too.
p-edit: Wimpy hasn't siteflaked; I'm playing with him right now.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:46 pm
by Looker
Besides, I'm sure he's an alt.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:22 pm
by chamber
In post 1121, Titus wrote:I have no interest in voting Amrun or bugspray today.
By votes, Looker is scum.
By mechanics, Creature is.
Please stop calling me Creature.
By mechanics I'm scum? Thats nonsense. What do you even know about the mechanics? If we take 2 scum 2 masons 5 Vts as a balanced baseline setup (which seems at least plausible) making one of those masons a macho innocent child reduces the town power. Adding a neighbourhood and a bodyguard don't significantly increase town power, perhaps enough to offset the macho Innocent child Mason. All of this still counts on the scum having no abilities though. Do you know anything about what the scum have? In my current thoughts scum!bugspray has some ability that clued him into the existence of masons, for one.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:33 pm
by Amrun
In post 1142, bugspray wrote:Do you think he'd actually take the advice or say fuck off I know what I'm doing?
In post 1144, Looker wrote:Amrun and I are going to kill each other. If Titus is alive tomorrow, kill her, too.
p-edit: Wimpy hasn't siteflaked; I'm playing with him right now.
Idk I’m stuck between the two of you atm.
@Titus: wimpy was force replaced here for being toxic, and is openly a secret alt, not a newbie.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:13 pm
by Titus
@Amrun: So I'm RC's slot. Good to know.
@Creature Part of the basic premise of mafia is that they are the informed minority. That premise gets completely blown out of the water if we're both town unless 3 scum.
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:24 pm
by Looker
There is no Creature