Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:07 pm
Eve should be able to collaborate my partial claim.
So it claims and we go gee this guy has everyone else's role, so we lynch it?In post 1128, pisskop wrote:it might be a scum mailman . . .
do you think its likely we are dealing with duplicate roles? I mean, we _do_ have _2_ masons. What about a joat with a sampler of several other player abilities?
I thought you thought I was scum, so wouldn't it be a pro-town move in your mind?In post 1130, alimdia wrote:Titus, you know we can't lynch Egix right? He got treestumped.
I really can't tell if thats an anti town play or scum play
The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.In post 1068, EspressoPatronum wrote:I support a full claim today.
If we're actually in mylo, I'd prefer if the JOAT confirmed eyestott's story.
I'm just a glorified VT, just like Mastina, and whoever this flavour investigator is. Though I'm not comfortable handing IC status to whoever claims that role, even if it means forsaking my earlier argument that mafia couldn't have a purely flavour role.In post 1069, EspressoPatronum wrote:On another note, I'd also like to discuss the merits of eyestott fullclaiming everyone's flavour. Everyone could then confirm/deny that is their flavour. I'm struggling to see the point in the nightly flavour reveals, so maybe there's more than eyestott is letting on.
@gobble - who did you target last night?
I am ConfucianIn post 1102, Egix96 wrote:I have reason to believe these parts are true.In post 1040, eyestott wrote:Last night I received a letter in the mail.The message didn’t reveal who sent it, but they said that they’rea JOAT (who) investigated PK night 1and got guilty.
Fully support D4 massclaims. Not today please.In post 1113, EspressoPatronum wrote:Intent to vote pisskop. Not sure if it's at L-2 or L-1 now so imma hold off on actually voting.
We should definitely do claims tomorrow if we don't do them today.
The less I say, the better chance I have of not giving the JOATs identity away.In post 1118, Eve wrote:yo eyestott you need to tell us more about this message
Huh, weird.In post 1124, alimdia wrote:I'm gonna do a partial claim, and redact some stuff because I don't want to give other info away 'freely'
I am an mailman. I sent a mail to Eve last night. The contents of the mail shall remain secret for now, but it definitely is NOT 'I'm a JOAT and I got a guilty on pisskop N1', so that rules out me being redirected to eyescott.
I did not send a mail to anyone else last night. Therefore, I'm struggling to understand how eyescott got a mail last night.
I also did not send mail on N1, Eve should understand why.
The conclusion is that the mailman is either scum or eyescott is just bs'ing the whole thing up.
yea, and you decided to not share this before because you wanted to see us squirmIn post 1135, eyestott wrote:The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.
Wow PK, try some empathyIn post 1137, pisskop wrote:theirs bs and then theres this.
In post 1015, pisskop wrote:Im sorry guys, Im having job issues and stuff
You of all people shouldn’t be putting flak on people for being inactiveIn post 1016, eyestott wrote:Don’t feel bad.
I spent most of every day since Wednesday a week and a bit ago, preparing to run a Pathfinder Campaign which started tonight. (And got so much interest from friends I have a second group starting the same campaign tomorrow night), so everyone has busy times. Let’s all 3 try to be more active during D3, eh?
Oh I thought that’s what you were trying to say with this, saying that my recent inactivity was a calculated decision to sow discord.In post 1136, pisskop wrote:yea, and you decided to not share this before because you wanted to see us squirmIn post 1135, eyestott wrote:The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.