The only role I would ever unvote for is vig and that's assuming we can leash it. Otherwise, I don't think there's a single role in this setup I'd unvote for.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:40 pm
by Firebringer
i think gobbles is a vig.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:41 pm
by skitter30
I dont think he's a vig and i should probably stop posting about this now
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:48 pm
by gobbledygook
We have now entered the inquisition
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:00 pm
by Pink Ball
I meaaaaan scum can crumb too. I crumb much more as scum than as town
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:02 pm
by skitter30
Yeah i'm aware of that, but it was enough that i didnt want to push him day1
Like it gives him a day1 pass but that's it
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:02 pm
by gobbledygook
The reasons for voting me are... literally the dumbest reasons I have ever read.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:27 pm
by gobbledygook
First things first, every single person who has voted my wagon needs to substantiate their reason for voting me. The list of people who need to substantiate why they voted me:
- Bingle
- Datisi
- Menalque
- MariaR
- Pink Ball
- Firebringer
- PenguinPower
Oh wow. Would you look at that. HALF THE GAME HAS VOTED ME AS A SERIOUS WAGON. I WONDER IF THAT MEANS ANYTHING.
I will not take clucking awful meta reads as reasons to vote for me. Oh wait... I guess that does away with all the reasons for voting me.
---
In post 1069, Menalque wrote:His presence has generally been very weak, and he really reminds me here of how he approached his Team Mafia game. He's good enough as scum to fake it to an extent, but not to be excited.
You didn't clearly didn't read Whiteflag.
In post 1070, Menalque wrote:pureboi, Blake, firebringer, S_S, I would encourage some combination of you to help vote gobbles up to L-1 so we can get a claim, if you agree with my analysis
if not, please clarify why you don't
This is incredibly scummy by the way. Would you have lynched had I not claimed PR?
---
About the only read I agree with you on is the Lilith read. I thought it was odd that she felt the need to say that she was busy and wouldn't be back for a while after popping to ask me a question.
to base a meta read on someone off one game, are you?
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:30 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1127, MariaR wrote:The only role I would ever unvote for is vig and that's assuming we can leash it. Otherwise, I don't think there's a single role in this setup I'd unvote for.
I would never allowed myself to be leashed by a town that blitz wagoned me within 72 hours of the game starting. Towns that do that don't deserve to have the benefit of leashed vigilantes. Sorry not sorry ~_~
In post 1120, gobbledygook wrote:I am PR though. I thought I’ve been pretty clear with my crumbs.
I saw it for the record
I'm not actually townreading him on play but i didnt want to push cuz of the crumb i saw, that's why i protested his wagon
What has been scummy about my play?
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:36 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1112, Pink Ball wrote:Wait you guys agree that gobbles doesn't have the wim he usually has??
Why does this make me scum?
How do you go from "gobbles isn't acting like that one game" to "gobbles is scum!!"
If you had taken a single second to read what my scum game is you would know that this is not it.
In post 1112, Pink Ball wrote:Wait you guys agree that gobbles doesn't have the wim he usually has??
I've been voting him all game for that exact reason.
Same question for you. How do you immediately jump to me being scum when you have literally never played with scum!gobble?
!
You're acting like you're an authority on scum!gobble when you are quite possibly the LEAST qualified person to be commenting on scum!gobble.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:36 pm
by skitter30
I wasnt scumreading you
I also wasnt townreading you
You were in my great big pile of null up until you interrogated me over my chemist vote, that was a weird convo
The thought did cross my mind earlier that you were trying to be lowkey to avoid getting nk'd
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:40 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1138, skitter30 wrote:
The thought did cross my mind earlier that you were trying to be lowkey to avoid getting nk'd
This did motivate me to be more active today, but it did not motivate me in my questioning of you.
I tend to get nightkilled when I don't do much, it is an odd phenomenon.
Whose vote looks the worst on my wagon in your opinion?
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:42 pm
by gobbledygook
VOTE: MariaR
This dies today.
She tried to get me hammered on day 3 of a two week long Day 1, before Bingle could catch up, before Liliith could catchup, before Chemist posted really anything of substance. AFTER I claimed I was a PR.
Her vote has the weakest substance and her self defense for not scumhunting earlier is that she is a reactive player so it is "NAI" for her to be reactive and not proactive. Yet she's being super proactive now after I heavily crumbed.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:44 pm
by gobbledygook
Also does no one at all find it out that Menalque's STRONGEST scumreads barely have ANYTHING written about him thinking that PP and I are feeling off?
Da cluck?
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:45 pm
by MariaR
All gobble is doing is flailing at this point. Crumbs a role and won't even claim it yet for some reason states that he crumbed it defeating the entire purpose. People have given valid reasons to scumread him and he's just not doing anything about it. This scum rage is fake in my eyes. He's not even saying who the scum on his wagon are. Just calling everyone stupid. I don't see any reads just...it's really bad.
She tried to get me hammered on day 3 of a two week long Day 1, before Bingle could catch up, before Liliith could catchup, before Chemist posted really anything of substance. AFTER I claimed I was a PR.
Her vote has the weakest substance and her self defense for not scumhunting earlier is that she is a reactive player so it is "NAI" for her to be reactive and not proactive. Yet she's being super proactive now after I heavily crumbed.
You're just bringing up random points for the sake of making a case than genuinely believing them. You never brought up Lilith before this or Chemist. You're just adding this to try and make me look bad. Also, anyone can fake a PR me wanting to lynch you after claiming you're a pr isn't important. Should I just drop my scumread on you because you claimed something you can fake? My 'self denfese' was the page you called me scummy on was me answering questions. There was nothing to scumhunt. I've said this multiple times and you choose to ignore it.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:51 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1142, MariaR wrote:People have given valid reasons to scumread him and he's just not doing anything about it.
This is literally such bs it isn't even fathomable. I'm sorry you drew scum again MariaR, but you should have just tried to nightkill me instead.
NO ONE ON MY WAGON HAS ACTUALL Y GIVEN A REASON TO VOTE ME.
Bingle has a weird ass meta case that makes no sense "GOBBLE WOULDN"T THINK THIS OMG GOOBLE WOULDN"T THINK THIS!!" When Bingle was in TWO games with me where people attacked me for this same exact dumb cluck reasoning (Menalque attacking my vote on Ginngie's RVS where I was right and Menalque was wrong and Bingle himself! attacking my vote on Pine in Ginggie mafia where I was right and Bingle was wrong).
Datisi is sheep??
Menalque is a terrible meta read where he thinks because he was my teammate in Team Mafia he has knowledge of my scum game. Hint: Mena checked the cluck out after getting guiltied by mastina and didn't do anything for my game
Firebringer for "you feel off!"
PenguinPower to match my wagon with Bingles
Pink Ball for "you feel off!"
Mariar for "you feel off!"
NONE OF THE "YOU FEEL OFF" PEOPLE HAVE ANY REAL INCLINATION OF WHAT MY SCUM GAME IS.
HINT: It is that Abusrd alisae hydra game where I POSTED 30 TIMES ON A 100 PAGE DAY 1 AND DIDN'T EVEN SUBMIT A NIGHT ACTION.
How *anyone* can thin kthat I am coasting, or flying under the radar, or whatever buzzword du jour they want to use is beyond me.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:54 pm
by MariaR
You not liking peoples reasons to scumread you doesn't take away from the fact they exist.
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:55 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1144, MariaR wrote:You're just bringing up random points for the sake of making a case than genuinely believing them. You never brought up Lilith before this or Chemist.
How does this make any sense? Why would I bring them up on a case against you that involves you trying get me lynched at L-1 when you did not try to get me lynched at L-1 until just a few hours ago?? Are you even thinking when you write your posts or does your red pm make you nonsensical?
In post 1144, MariaR wrote:Should I just drop my scumread on you because you claimed something you can fake? My 'self denfese' was the page you called me scummy on was me answering questions. There was nothing to scumhunt. I
Yes, you should drop your scumread on me because I claimed PR and hinted at it heavily enough that at least one person figured it out. You did nothing with those questions or really try to interact with the people asking those questions. I called you out for being reactive and you said that was your playstyle, yet now you're being very active in trying to get a claimed PR lynched, so were you lying then or are you lying now?
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:56 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1146, MariaR wrote:You not liking peoples reasons to scumread you doesn't take away from the fact they exist.
Ephemeral "feelings" are not valid reasons to lynch someone who is a claimed PR on day 3/14 on Day 1 of a game where PRs are very important to dealing with scum given how powerful scum PRs are.
So... yes...
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:58 pm
by gobbledygook
In post 1142, MariaR wrote:He's not even saying who the scum on his wagon are. Just calling everyone stupid. I don't see any reads just...it's really bad.
This is wrong. I voted you. I said you were scum.
I never called anyone stupid, those are your words not mine.