Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 1:24 am
I think Egix is town forthe response. For me what hem said was more of a townslip.
At wgat point in time did you think I was hunting for prs then?In post 1085, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I wasn't paying attentionIn post 1083, Dunnstral wrote:Then why didn't you push that when it happened?
In post 746, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i'm trying to tryhard but I think I can sum up my opinions very concisely in bullet points. i'm never gonna finish if i link every impression, so you can ask that later. but it's good that it's up here so that it can be useful. consider this a collective thing that we can prove/disprove. whatever.
Andante/VFP
• engaged in the game
• transparent and consistent process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense
take: probably town. not gonna consider lynching d1.
Anya
• skirting in the sidelines
• transparent and consistent process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• i can't characterize their early setup spec as PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: unsure with a slight town bias. not gonna consider lynching d1.
bugspray
• skirting in the sidelines
• surprisingly consistent but opaque process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• i don't know if i can characterize their early setup spec as PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: unsure. very unsure. dare i say with a slight town bias. i almost want to lynch this for being tough to read, but that's not how you play this game.
Dunnstral
• biggest lurker in this game
• not only is it inconsistent it's also opaque
• hasn't slipped in perspective (probably because they haven't talked)
• the way he interacted with Anya's early setup spec standed out as very specific — like it's PR hunting
• hasn't overexpained anything in their defense (because they haven't talked)
take: unsure with heavy scum bias. this is my "lurker lynch" in d1.
Egix96
• looks engaged, but not really. ("I'm willing to admit, it does feel a bit like he's in commentary mode.")
• transparent but inconsistent process. (very notable thing is that he doesn't move his vote/convictions until it's been seconded by someone else and it doesn't feel like he has his own process.)
• i don't empathize with his perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: probably scum. this is one of two of my "probably scum" lynch in d1.
geraintm
• second biggest lurker in the game
• transparent and consistent process (his ground is fucking solid)
• hasn't slipped in perspective (his ground is fucking solid)
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting.
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense. (again, his ground is fucking solid)
take: disgustingly unsure with a slight town bias. not gonna consider lynching d1.
InsidiousLemons
• engaged in the game
• transparent but inconsistent process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting
• has a habit of overexplaining in their defense, but im not sure if it's incoherent.
take: unsure with a wildcard bias. guy's a good ally if he's town. guy's a dangerous scum if he's scum. almost want to lynch just to flip this slot, but that's not how you play this game.
Ivyeo
• engaged in the game
• transparent and consistent process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: probably town. not gonna consider lynching d1.
osuka
• looks engaged, but not really (bugs is spot on #220)
• inconsistent and opaque process (hostile, but not really trying to scumhunt. called me scum — DIDNT VOTE ME)
• has slipped in perspective when he chainsaw defended Lemons
• has demonstrated that they're PR hunting (called out gerain as PR, for no good reason)
• has incoherently overexplained in their defenses
take: probably scum. this is one of two of my "probably scum" lynch in d1.
T3
• skirting in the sidelines
• opaque but consistent process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hutning
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: unsure with a heavy town bias. not gonna consider lynching d1.
Umlaut
• engaged in the game (when he was here)
• opaque process (keeps his cards close)
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• hasn't demonstrated that they're PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense
take: unsure with a heavy town bias. not gonna consider lynching d1
Maybe now it's day 2, we can see a different you.In post 1135, geraintm wrote:just popping in to say hello and ive obviously got nothing to add from last night
distancing.jpgIn post 746, humaneatingmonkey wrote:bugspray
• skirting in the sidelines
• surprisingly consistent but opaque process
• hasn't slipped in perspective
• i don't know if i can characterize their early setup spec as PR hunting
• isn't incoherently overexplaining in their defense.
take: unsure. very unsure. dare i say with a slight town bias. i almost want to lynch this for being tough to read, but that's not how you play this game.
Also Ivy, and ~maybe~ Egix96 as well.
humaneatingmonkey wrote:osuka, is this you? Confirm.
i'll be doing more, but i just wanted to very quickly say that i would not be adding anything from what Mod has postedIn post 1137, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Maybe now it's day 2, we can see a different you.In post 1135, geraintm wrote:just popping in to say hello and ive obviously got nothing to add from last night
What does this mean btw?
I'm sorry. Instead of Egix96, make this geraintm and T3.In post 1139, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Also Ivy, and ~maybe~ Egix96 as well.